Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Williams”
900 N.E.2d 481 (2009) William B. REEDUS, Appellant-Petitioner, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Appellee-Respondent. No. 49A02-0808-CV-760. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 30, 2009. *482 Mary J. Hoeller, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Elizabeth
878 N.E.2d 346 (2007) Andrew W. MILLER, Appellant-Claimant, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Unemployment Insurance Review Board and United Parcel Service, Inc., Appellees. No. 93A02-0704-EX-316. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 21, 2007. *349 William R. Groth, Fillenwarth Dennerline Groth & Towe, Indianap
Indiana State University v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Developmentpublic domain
868 N.E.2d 839 (2007) INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, Appellant-Respondent, v. REVIEW BOARD OF the INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and William A. Lafief, Appellees-Claimants. No. 93A02-0611-EX-1012. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 22, 2007. John R. Maley, Kristin Shedlock, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Steve Ca
852 N.E.2d 954 (2006) Sandra K. PENNY, Appellant, v. REVIEW BOARD OF the INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Appellee. No. 93A02-0506-EX-577. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 18, 2006. *955 William C. Moyer, Lorch & Naville, LLC, New Albany, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indi
OPINION RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Lisa K. Bailey appeals the decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development (the Board) which determined her to be ineligible for unemployment benefits. We reverse and remand. ISSUES Bailey raises two issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
James E. Saylor v. State of Indiana ex rel. Department of Workforce Development (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 25 2020, 8:31 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Schultz v. Department of Workforce Developmentpublic domain
752 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2010) Linda SCHULTZ, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Defendant. No. 09-cv-274-slc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. October 21, 2010. *1017 Paul Kinne, Gingras, Cates & Luebke, S.C., A. Steven Porter, Attorney at Law, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. Richard Briles Moriart
Indianapolis Concrete, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals of the Indiana Department of Workforce Developmentpublic domain
900 N.E.2d 48 (2009) INDIANAPOLIS CONCRETE, INC., Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS OF the INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Appellee. No. 93A02-0806-EX-474. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 29, 2009. Sean M. Clapp, Fishers, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Elizabeth Rogers, Deputy Attorney
FILED Dec 31 2020, 8:49 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Workforce Development Cabinet v. Gainespublic domain
276 S.W.3d 789 (2008) WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CABINET, Department for Employment Services, Division of Unemployment Insurance, Appellant, v. Mary C. GAINES, Appellee. No. 2005-SC-000965-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 26, 2008. Rehearing Denied March 19, 2009. *790 Stewart Christopher Burch, Logan & Gai
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Sep 11 2024, 9:04 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Brookston Resources, Inc., an Ill
OPINION BROOK, Chief Judge. Case Summary Appellant-claimant Briana K. Doughty ("Doughty") appeals the determination of appellee Review Board of the Department of Workforce Development ("the Board") that appellee-employer Schwab Corporation ("Schwab") discharged him for just cause. We affirm. Issue Doughty raises one issue for our review, which we res
656 N.E.2d 842 (1995) KBI, INC., Appellant-Employer, v. REVIEW BOARD OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND KYLE B. COX, Appellees-Claimants. No. 93A02-9501-EX-41. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 24, 1995. *843 Janet Barbre Norton, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, Thomas A. Brennan, Daniel
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing FILED the defense of res judicata, collateral Dec 21 2020, 9:23 am estoppel, or the law of the case. CLERK
Indiana State University v. LaFiefpublic domain
SHEPARD, Chief Justice. The issue is whether a university professor who agreed to a fixed-term employment contract was entitled to unemployment benefits upon the non-renewal of his contract. We hold that the professor was not voluntarily unemployed and is entitled to benefits. Facts and Procedural History Indiana State University appointed William LaFief to a position as an assistant p
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 23S-EX-129 May 30 2024, 11:11 am CLERK The City of Carmel, Indiana, Indiana Suprem
Peltz v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (In Re AR Accessories Group, Inc.)public domain
267 B.R. 583 (2001) In re AR ACCESSORIES GROUP, INC., Debtor. Scott Peltz, Trustee of the AR Accessories Group, Inc. Liquidating Trust, and Bank One, Wisconsin, Plaintiffs, v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-22580-JES. Adversary No. 98-2500. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 18, 2001.
698 N.E.2d 1 (1998) SALIN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. REVIEW BOARD OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and Frances Y. Hatfield, Appellees. No. 93A02-9710-EX-720. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 12, 1998. *2 William N. Salin, Indianapolis, for appellant. Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indian
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jun 26 2019, 9:08 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing
FILED Jan 03 2019, 2:03 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE Indiana Supreme Court Supreme Cou