Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 501 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas which, following a jury verdict, dismissed the claim of appellant, the Industrial Heat Treating Company, Inc., for damages arising out of the alleged negligent and/or fraudulent misrepresentation of appellee, Toledo Stamping and Manufactur

The claimant-widow appeals from a summary judgment dismissal of her claim for workers' compensation benefits for her husband's death. Like the Industrial Commission, the trial court concluded that her husband did not sustain his fatal injuries in the course of and arising out of his employment. The widow argues that her husband's death was causally related to his employment, or that it resulted from a special hazard incident to his employment. Presently controlling precedent rejects those con

80 B.R. 880 (1987) In the Matter of COMMERCIAL HEAT TREATING OF DAYTON, INC., Debtor. COMMERCIAL HEAT TREATING OF DAYTON, INC., Plaintiff, v. ATLAS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 3-83-02561, Adv. No. 3-85-0184. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. December 9, 1987. *881 Thomas B. Talbot, Jr., Dayton, O

439 F.Supp.2d 898 (2006) Joanne ANDRESHAK, Plaintiff, v. SERVICE HEAT TREATING, INC., Involuntary Plaintiff, v. LensCrafters, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Zorik Bunchuk, O.D., ABC Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 06-C-0463. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 17, 2006. *899 Lora A. Kaelber, Sha

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ASTRO ALUMINUM TREATING CO., INC., Appellant, v. INTER CONTAL, INC., Appellee. No. 4D19-2921 [May 27, 2020] Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial

Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Long Oil Heat, Inc., doing business as Long Energy ("Long Oil"), brings this diversity action against Defendants William Spencer ("William"), Thomas Spencer ("Thomas," together with William, the "Spencers" or the "Spencer Defendants"), North East Freightways, Inc. ("NEF"), and Phillip J. Palker to recover unpaid balances

233 S.W.3d 524 (2007) LONE STAR HEAT TREATING CO., LTD., Appellant v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 14-06-00028-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 23, 2007. *525 Charles E. Frost, Jr., and Steven Jon Knight, Houston, TX, for appellants. John C. Hart, Fort Worth, TX, for appel

Alice Robie Resnick, J. This case presents two issues for our determination: (1) whether appellant (buyer) provided appellee (seller) with adequate notice required by R.C. 1302.65(C)(1) so as to preserve a claim for breach of express warranty; and (2) whether appellant, a new business, may recover lost profits. An overview of the contractual relationship between the parties is beneficial to our determination of these issues.

G. S. Allen, J. Seventeen months and three weeks after final judgment was entered on August 29, 1985, dismissing plaintiffs’ action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a successor circuit judge, acting pursuant to MCR 2.612(C)(1)(f), set aside the judgment and reinstated suit against defendant. From an order dated April 10, 1987, incorporating the trial court’s ruling, defendant appeals by leave granted. We affirm.<

923 P.2d 569 (1996) EDWARDS INDUSTRIES, INC., Edwards Heat Treating Service, Inc., and Mark A. Edwards, Appellants, v. DTE/BTE, INC., Respondent. No. 25012. Supreme Court of Nevada. August 16, 1996. *570 Harris, Trimmer and Thompson, Reno, for Appellants. Walther, Key, Maupin, Oats, Cox, Klaich and Legoy and Paul J. Anders

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge. I. Introduction and Procedural History Plaintiff SMJ & J, Inc. (“SMJ & J”) filed a Complaint (Doc. 1) against Defendant NRG Heat & Power, LLC (“NRG”) seeking, inter alia, injunctive relief for NRG’s alleged violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), Pennsylvania Trademark Act, 54 Pa

698 N.E.2d 710 (1998) 298 Ill. App.3d 349 232 Ill.Dec. 619 MODERN STEEL TREATING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIQUID CARBONIC INDUSTRIAL/MEDICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-96-1422. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. September 2, 1998. Rehearing Denied September 2, 1998.

431 Pa. Superior Ct. 240 (1994) 636 A.2d 219 ELLWOOD CITY FORGE CORPORATION v. FORT WORTH HEAT TREATING COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Ellwood City Heat Treating and/or Advanced Metallurgical Technology, Inc., Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted November 8, 1993. Filed January 13, 1994. *241

*787OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [13] LAURIE J. MICHELSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Linda Gibbs alleges that her former employer, Defendant Voith Industrial Services, and former supervisor, Defendant Ralph Ilardi, violated state and federal law by changing her work assignment, denying

Stoll, Circuit Judge. Appellants Heat On-The-Fly, LLC and Super Heaters North Dakota, LLC (together, "HOTF") 1 appeal the district court's judgment of inequitable conduct, summary judgment of obviousness, denial of judgment as a matter of law of no tortious interference, construction of disputed claim terms, and dismissal of

MAIN, Justice. Precision Gear Company, Precision Gear LLC, and General Metal Heat Treating, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the gear manufacturers”), third-party defendants in the underlying action, were granted permission to appeal from the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to dismiss the third-party claims against them filed by Continental Motors, Inc. See Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P. The tria

150 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2001) Albert LAU, Plaintiff, v. BEHR HEAT TRANSFER SYSTEM, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 00-4127-KES. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division. June 6, 2001. *1018 A. Russell Janklow, Matthew T. Tobin, Johnson, Heidepriem, Miner, Marlow & Janklow, Sioux Falls, SD, for plaintiff.

OPINION NUGENT, Bankruptcy Judge. Section 1121(e) of the Bankruptcy Code1 provides that in small business Chapter 11 cases, only the debtor may file a plan of reorganization in the first 180 *866days after the case’s filing.2 The court may extend the debtor’s exclusivity period for a longer

546 F.3d 847 (2008) SYCAMORE INDUSTRIAL PARK ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERICSSON, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-1118. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 9, 2008. Decided October 20, 2008. *848 William J. Anaya (argued), Hal R. Morris, Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Chicago, IL

346 F.Supp.2d 991 (2004) HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS, LOCAL NO. 19, Plaintiff, v. INSULATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 03-C-1018. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. November 16, 2004. *992 Matthew R. Robbins, Previant Goldberg Uelmen Gratz, Miller & Brueggeman SC, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Daniel J. Fi