Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Inspired Healthcare Capital Holdings, LLC”
MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Universal’s First Amended and Supplemental Complaint. (D.I.44). The motion has been fully briefed (D.I.45, 48, 49). The Court heard oral argument. (D.I.54). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND<
Paul Witmer v. Armistice Capital, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL WITMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0807-MTZ ) ARMISTICE CAPITAL, LLC, ) ARMISTICE CAPITAL MASTER FUND ) LTD., STEVEN BOYD, JOSHUA ) DISBROW, GARY CANTRELL, JOHN ) DONOFRIO, JR., CARL DOCKERY,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GLOBAL CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and ) ACCESS MANAGEMENT, S.A.S., INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0877-JTL ) GREEN SAPPHIRE HOLDINGS, INC. ) )
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 19-3693 _______________ CARE ONE MANAGEMENT LLC, ET AL. Appellants v. UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, ET AL. ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 19-3693 _______________ CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL., Appellants v. UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, ET AL. ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o
Senior Care Living, VI, LLC v. Preston Hollow Capital, LLC UMB Bank N.A. TMI Trust Companypublic domain
Opinion issued May 14, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00602-CV ——————————— SENIOR CARE LIVING VI, LLC AND MARK C. BOULDIN, Appellants V. PRESTON HOLLOW CAPITAL, LLC, UMB BANK N.A., AND TMI
Senior Care Living, VI, LLC v. Preston Hollow Capital, LLC UMB Bank N.A. TMI Trust Companypublic domain
Opinion issued November 30, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00602-CV ——————————— SENIOR CARE LIVING VI, LLC AND MARK C. BOULDIN, Appellants V. PRESTON HOLLOW CAPITAL, LLC, UMB BANK N
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHESTER COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND on behalf of ) itself and all other similarly situated ) former stockholders of KCG ) HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0421-KSJM
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHESTER COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND on behalf of ) itself and all other similarly situated ) former stockholders of KCG ) HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0421-KSJM
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BIRCH STRATEGIC CAPITAL, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-0660-MTZ ) GLOBAL NOURISH, LLC and ) INNA TUMARIN, )
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Relator Chester Saldivar’s Third Motion to Amend his Complaint [Doc. 92-1].1 Relator has alleged that Defendant has engaged in a fraudulent billing scheme involving medications it received for free from manufacturers and administered to dialysis patients but for which it sought reimbursement fr
Fox v. CDX Holdings, Inc., C.A. No. 8031-VCLpublic domain
EFiled: Jul 28 2015 08:00AM EDT Transaction ID 57611881 Case No. 8031-VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KURT FOX, on behalf of himself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, )
Akerblom v. Ezra Holdings Ltd.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Before the Court are three Motions: Defendant Emas Subsea Services, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (“Emas Subsea’s Motion”) (Doc. No. 5); Defendants Ezra Holdings Limited, Ezra Energy Services PTE Ltd., and Emas Offshore Limited’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and, Alternatively, on the Basis of Forum Non Co
DG BF, LLC v. Michael Raypublic domain
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 July 9, 2020 Sean J. Bellew, Esqui
673 F.Supp.2d 718 (2009) PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., David C. Dvorak and James T. Crines, Defendants. No. 1:08-cv-1041-SEB-DML. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. December 1, 2009.
782 F.Supp.2d 294 (2011) NORTH CYPRESS MEDICAL CENTER OPERATING CO. et al, Plaintiffs, v. CIGNA HEALTHCARE et al, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-cv-2556. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 2, 2011. *297 J. Douglas Sutter, Kelly Sutter et al, Houston, TX, Neil L. Prupis, Lampf Lipkind et al., West
Diamond Candles, LLC v. Winterpublic domain
Diamond Candles, LLC v. Winter, 2020 NCBC 17. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION PERSON COUNTY 18 CVS 736 DIAMOND CANDLES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12(B)(2) AND JUSTIN WINTER; BAKER BOTTS,
Two Old Hippies, LLC v. Catch the Bus, LLCpublic domain
784 F.Supp.2d 1200 (2011) TWO OLD HIPPIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CATCH THE BUS, LLC, Gary Mack and Fallon Mack, Defendants. No. CIV 10-0459 JB/RLP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. February 11, 2011. *1204 Rebecca L. Avitia, Thomas P. Gulley, Bannerman & Johnson, PA, Albuquerque, NM, for the Plaintiff. Catch t
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CITY OF HIALEAH EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively ) on Behalf of Nominal Defendants ) nCINO, INC. (f/k/a Penny HoldCo, ) Inc.) and nCINO OpCo, Inc. (f/k/a ) nCino, Inc.), ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0846-MTZ
Ranieri v. Adirondack Dev. Group, LLCpublic domain
DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this copyright infringement action filed by Plaintiff, Dominick Ranieri, d/b/a Dominick Ranieri Architect, P.C. (“Plaintiff’) against the above captioned entities and individuals (“Defendants”), are the following four motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56: (1) Plaintiffs motion for