Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Integrated Recycling Group of SC, LLC”
ABB, Inc. v. Integrated Recycling Group of SC, LLCpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals ABB, Inc., and BFP, LP, a/k/a Bullington Family Partnership, Respondents, v. Integrated Recycling Group of SC, LLC, John Murphy Armstrong, Jr., and Michael T. Armstrong, Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-001943 Appeal from Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit
Taylor, Darlene v. Dale's Recyclingpublic domain
FILED Jul 15, 2025 09:32 AM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Appellant-Respondent, v. South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff, Hasala Dharmawardena, CMC Recycling, Cypress Creek Renewables, LLC, South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs, Sierra Club, South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, South Carolina Energy Users Committee, South Carolina Solar Business Alliance, Inc., South Carolina State Conference of the National Association for the Advancem
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Golden Door Properties, LLC v. County of San Diegopublic domain
Filed 6/12/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOLDEN DOOR PROPERTIES, LLC, D075328 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018-0001- 3324-CU-TT-CTL) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC v. PCS Nitrogen, Inc.public domain
791 F.Supp.2d 431 (2011) ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PCS NITROGEN, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ross Development Corporation; J. Holcombe Enterprises, L.P.; James H. Holcombe; J. Henry Fair, Jr.; Allwaste Tank Cleaning, Inc. n/k/a PSC Container Services, LLC; Robin Hood Container Express, Inc.; City of Charleston, South Carolina, Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-2782-MBS.<
ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC v. PCS Nitrogen, Inc.public domain
746 F.Supp.2d 692 (2010) ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PCS NITROGEN, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ross Development Corporation; J. Holcombe Enterprises, L.P.; James H. Holcombe; J. Henry Fair, Jr.; Allwaste Tank Cleaning, Inc. n/k/a PSC Container Services, LLC; Robin Hood Container Express, Inc.; City of Charleston, South Carolina, Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-2782-MBS.<
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 4:07 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Yadkin Riverkeeper, Inc., and Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., (collectively, “Riverkeepers”) bring this citizen enforcement action against Defendant Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, (“Duke Energy”) alleging violations of the Clean Water Act of 1972 at Duke Energy’s Buck Steam Station power plant. Before the Court are Duke Energy’s Motion to
Jones Creek Investors, LLC v. Columbia Countypublic domain
*1282 ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Jones Creek Investors alleges that activities occurring upstream from its pond, Willow Lake, have inundated Willow Lake with sediment, which in turn causes the golf course it operates to become flooded with murky water every time it rains. While Jones Creek Investors initially broug
Jamgotchian v. Kentucky Horse Racing Commissionpublic domain
. OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE HUGHES " On May 21, 2011, Appellant Jerry Jam-gotchian claimed Rochitta, a bay filly, for $42,400 in a claiming race at Churchill Downs in Louisville, Kentucky. Foaled February 26, 2008 in Pennsylvania, Rochit-ta was first purchased at the 2009 Keene-land Yearling. Sales in Lexington, Kentucky for $160,000 by Rabbah Bloodstock. Prior to her debut at Churchill Downs, Rochitta
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Healthpublic domain
Opinion PALMER, J. The issue presented by this case is whether the state statutory prohibition against same sex marriage violates the constitution of Connecticut. The plaintiffs, eight same sex couples, commenced this action, claiming that the state statutory prohibition against same sex marriage violates their rights to substantive due process and eq
Jacque Lucas v. KapStone Paper & Packagingpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Jacque Lucas, Shirley Ann Lucas, and Daniel Simerly, Appellants, v. KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation, Safway Group Holdings, LLC, Easy Way Insulation Co., Sypris Technologies, Inc. f/k/a Tube-Turns Technologies Inc., Thompson Construction Group, Inc., and Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Defendants, of which KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation and KapStone Kraft Paper Co
723 F.Supp.2d 886 (2010) OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, INC., West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc., and Sierra Club, Plaintiffs, v. HOBET MINING, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:09-1167. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. July 12, 2010. *894 Derek O. Teaney, Joseph Mark Lovett, Le
717 F.Supp.2d 541 (2010) OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, INC., West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc., and Sierra Club, Plaintiffs, v. HOBET MINING, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:09-1167. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. June 14, 2010. *549 Derek O. Teaney, Joseph Mark Lovett, Le
Moses v. Ruszkowskipublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 16:59:29 2019.02.07 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2019-NMSC-003 Filing Date: December 13, 2018 Doc
Moses v. Ruszkowskipublic domain
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: December 13, 2018 4 NO. S-1-SC-34974 5 CATHY MOSES AND PAUL F. 6 WEINBAUM, 7 Plaintiffs-Petitioners, 8 v. 9 CHRISTOPHER RUSZKOWSKI, 10 Secretary of Education, New Mexico 11 Public Education Department, 12 Defendant-Respondent, 13 and 14 ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY, et al., 15 Defendants/Intervenors-Respondents. 16 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI 17 Sarah M. Singleton, Distri
Barranco v. 3D Sys. Corp.public domain
Leslie E. Kobayashi, United States District Judge Following a jury trial, this matter came on for a one-day bench trial on the issue of equitable accounting on November 20, 2017. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ronald Barranco ("Plaintiff" or "Barranco") was represented by Mark Poe, Esq., and Patrick Shea, Esq. Defendants/Counterclaimants 3D Systems Corporation and 3D Systems, Inc. ("Defendants" or "3D Systems"), were represented b
Kelo v. City of New Londonpublic domain
Opinion NORCOTT, J. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the public use clauses of the federal and state constitutions authorize the exercise of the eminent domain power in furtherance of a significant economic development plan that is projected to create in excess of 1000 jobs, to increase tax and other revenues, and to revitalize an economically distressed city, including its downtown and wat