Cases

886 F.2d 871 50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1627,51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,359, 58 USLW 2193,14 O.S.H. Cas.(BNA) 1217,1989 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 28,673 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE ANDAGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, etal., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andLocal 322, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO,Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,v.JOHNSON CONTROLS, IN

Commissioner of the N.Y. State Dept. of Transp. v Polite (2024 NY Slip Op 06023) Commissioner of the N.Y. State Dept. of Transp. v Polite 2024 NY Slip Op 06023 Decided on December 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Connolly, J.P.<

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. This case concerns allegations of deception and bad faith against a health insurance company, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). Plaintiffs Beverly Clark, Jesse J. Paul, Warren Gold, Linda M. Cusanelli, Carole L. Walcher, and Terri L. Drogell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed a putative class action complaint against Prudenti

475 F.Supp.2d 692 (2007) Drusilla JENNINGS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF WASHTENAW and Larry Kloss, Defendants. No. 05-CV-73560-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 28, 2007. *693 *694 *695 Teresa J. Gorman, Hardin Assoc.,

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

988 F.Supp. 127 (1997) Gregory F. DANIEL, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BOARD OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, et al., Defendants. No. 90-CV-1086A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 19, 1997. *128 *129 *130 *1

155 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 31183-15. Filed November 18, 2020. P, a U.S. corporation, was the legal owner of the intellectual property (IP) necessary to manufacture, distribute, and sell some of the best-known beverage brands in the world. This IP included trade- marks, product names, lo

498 F.Supp.2d 389 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This document relates to: United States of America ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Dey, Inc., et al., Defendant. MDL No. 1456, Master File No. 01-12257-PBS, Civil Action No. 05-11084-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 17, 2007.

431 F.Supp.2d 98 (2006) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION This Document Relates to: People of the State of Illinois v. Abbott Laboratories et al. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Alpharma, Inc. et al. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Warrick Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al. People of the State of New York v. Pharmacia Corporation P

262 P.3d 874 (2011) Richard JACKSON; Mary Jackson; Thomas Fehringer; Deborah Hradecky; Robert Hradecky; Dean Lousberg; and Lousberg Partnership, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Petitioners. v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Union Oil Company of California, and Unocal Pipeline Company, Respondents. No. 09SC668. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. October 31, 2011.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 21 & 30) PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sexual Minorities Uganda is an umbrella organization located in Kampala, Uganda, comprising member organizations that advocate for the fair and equal treatment of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people in tha

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON OCTOBER 30, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON OCTOBER 30, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 648 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 649 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

HAMBLEN, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies of $1,569,156 and $5,931,159 in petitioner’s1 Federal income tax for taxable years ending December 31, 1977, and December 31, 1978, respectively (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the years in issue). STATEMENT OF ISSUES The issues involved in this case a

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The question raised in these related remand motions is whether a new Supreme Court decision can be an “order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained” that a case is removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). Plaintiffs Illinois, Kentucky and New York brought these seven actions in various state courts alleging t

770 F.Supp.2d 627 (2011) DDR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc., Schlesinger-Siemens Electrical, A Joint Venture d/b/a Schlesinger-Siemens Electrical LLC, Schlesinger Electrical Contractors, Inc., First Keystone Consultants, Inc., Alison Consulting Group, Inc., Jacob Levita, Robert Solomon, Jeffrey Deurlein, Joseph Guddemi, Robert Rigsby, Harry Volande, and Frank Krutemeier, an

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: In this consolidated, multi-district litigation (“MDL”), Plaintiffs1 are purchasers and users of a paint product called “Deck *778& Concrete Restore” or “Restore 10X” (collectively “Restore”), manufactured by Defendant Rust-Oleum Corporation (“Rust-O