Cases

505 F.Supp.2d 755 (2007) INTERNET ARCHIVE, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. Suzanne SHELL, Defendant and Counterclaimant, v. Brewster KAHLE, Rick Prelinger, and Kathleen Burke Third Party Defendants. No. CIVA 06CV01726LTBCBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 13, 2007. *756

ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. VERMONT NATIONAL TELEPHONE CO., Plaintiff-Relator, Civil Action No. 15-0728 (CKK) v. NORTHSTAR WIRELESS LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 9, 2023) In this qui

Case: 24-10724 Document: 84-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 19, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) NATALIA ARGOTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-cv-303 (RMC) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) METROPOLITAN POLICE

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2026Over the course of five days in April 2019, three committees of the U. S. House of Representatives issued four subpoenas seeking information about the finances of President Donald J. Trump, his children, and affiliated businesses. We have held that the House has authority under

OPINION BY JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH The question before us on appeal is whether the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Code § 2.2-3700 et seq. ("VFOIA") entitles The Daily Press to obtain a copy of a database from the Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia ("Executive Secretary") or whether, instead, The Daily Press must ask each j

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD DELMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0679-LWW ) GIGACQUISITIONS3, LLC, AVI ) KATZ, RALUCA DINU, NEIL ) MIOTTO, JOHN MIKULSKY, ) ANDREA BETTI-BERUTTO, and )

MEMORANDUM Bartle, District Judge. This action is the story of political corruption involving five criminal schemes. Following their convictions by a jury after a lengthy trial, the defendants have filed motions for judgments of acquittal under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or in the alternative for a new trial under Rule 33. Congressman Chaka Fattah, Sr., Herbert Vederma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 1:25-cv-01886 Case No. ____________ Plaintiff, STIPULATED ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, v. MONETARY

Slaughter, Justice. A Warrick County jury convicted Mathew McCallister of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. In this direct appeal, McCallister challenges (i) the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, (ii) various evidentiary rulings by the trial court, and (iii) the propriety of his sentence. We affirm the

Case: 19-1081 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 08/06/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2019-1081

ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge For the reasons set forth in the accompanying statement, the Court grants Defendants’ motions to dismiss [36][39][42], All four counts of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. A status hearing in this matter is set for July 29,2015, at 9:00 a.m. STATEMENT Plaintiff V

Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the "Plaintiff States' Motion for Preliminary *1251Injunction." Dkt. # 43. A temporary restraining order was entered on July 31, 2018, enjoining the federal defendants1 from implementing or enforcing a "Temporary Modification of

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs Guy Paquet and Elizabeth Paquet (the “Paquets”) bring this action against Defendant Mark Smith alleging that Defendant stole Plaintiffs’ water rights on real property in violation of a settlement agreement between th

219 P.3d 184 (2009) Mark A. VANVELZOR, Appellant, v. Jessica A. VANVELZOR, Appellee. No. S-13272. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 13, 2009. *185 Kenneth M. Wasche, Kenneth M. Wasche, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellant. No appearance by Appellee. Before: FABE, Chief Justice, EASTAUGH, CARPENETI, WINFREE, and CHRISTEN,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Memory Integrity, LLC (“Memory Integrity” or “MI”) brings suit *1187against Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) for infringement of five patents of which Memory Integrity is the assignee: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,296,121 (the “121 patent”), 7,103,636 (the “’636 patent”), 7,107,-409 (the

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This case .involves two sets of business disputes, tied together by a common cast of characters and allegations concerning misappropriation of plaintiffs intellectual property. Plaintiff ICONICS is a software company which produces HMI/SCADA (Human Machine Interface/Supervis

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 43–108 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 26, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are