Cases

5 F.3d 51 24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,036 TRANSTECH INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation;Kin-Buc, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation; andFilcrest Realty, Inc., a New Jersey Corporationv.A & Z SEPTIC CLEAN; AAA Tank; A Alfante; ABM DisposalService; AM Environmental; A.E. Stanley ManufacturingCompany; Absolute Fire Protection, Inc.; Accurate Forming;Active Oil Service; Adchem Corp.; Adro

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. On September 12, 2014, this matter came before the Court for hearing on Asarco’s prima facie case on its contribution claim under CERCLA § 113(f) against Union Pacific (Doc. No. 214) and Union Pacific’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 220) At the hearing, the Court advised the parties that it would take all pending motions concerning

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge. This case presents an issue of first impression in the First Circuit: whether a creditor’s supply of electricity to a debtor within the 20 days preceding the commencement of a bankruptcy case constitutes a sale of goods, entitling the creditor to a priority administrative expense claim under § 503(b)(9) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

309 F.Supp.2d 104 (2004) GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MONROE BUS CORP. and Gitty Ungar d/b/a/ Washington Deluxe Bus Co. Defendants. No. CIV.02-2009(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 26, 2004. Fritz Reiner Kahn, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Gordon Pier MacDougall, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION SYSTEM OF ) THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI ) TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0466-JTL

796 F.Supp. 1511 (1992) DIAMOND WASTE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MONROE COUNTY, GA., et al., Defendants. C.A. 91-379-2-MAC (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. May 12, 1992. *1512 Linwood Robert Lovett, Macon, Ga., for plaintiff. Frederick L. Wright, II, Atlanta, Ga., W. Franklin Freeman, Jr., Forsy

105 B.R. 834 (1989) In re CARDINAL INDUSTRIES, INC., In Joint Administration With Cardinal Industries of Florida, Inc., Debtors. CARDINAL INDUSTRIES, INC., and Cardinal Industries of Florida, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BUCKEYE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 2-89-02778, 2-89-02779, Adv. No. 2-89-0203. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D.<

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

399 F.3d 651 CITY OF MONROE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Yoichiro Kaizaki; Masatoshi Ono, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-5505. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 9, 2004. Decided and Filed: F

OBERDORFER, Senior District Judge. In this appeal, we review the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of a securities fraud class action Consolidated Complaint (“Complaint”) filed by investors in Bridgestone Corporation (“Bridgestone”) against Bridgestone, its subsidiary Bridge-stone/Firestone, Inc. (“Firestone”), Bridgestone Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) Yoiehiro Kaizaki,

387 F.3d 468 CITY OF MONROE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Yoichiro Kaizaki; Masatoshi Ono, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-5505. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 9, 2004. Decided and Filed: O

845 F.Supp. 592 (1994) The APPRAISERS COALITION, Alan B. Blau, individually and d/b/a Alan Blau & Associates, W.S. Buckley, Buckley Appraisal Services, Inc., Vincent A. Solano, individually and d/b/a V.A. Solano & Associates, Plaintiffs, v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, an Illinois corporation, the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, an Illinois corporation, and Patricia Marshall, Bernard Fountain, Douglas Brown, C. David Matthews, Cliff

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In response to a mountain of compelling evidence that violence animated by gender bias deprives many citizens of their civil rights, substantially affects the national economy and interstate commerce,and creates a profound problem that the states had been unable to remedy, Congress enacted the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. In passing this legislation, Congre

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge HALL joined. Judge LUTTIG wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the gang rape of a freshman at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute by two members of the college football team, and the school’s decision to impose only a nominal punis

589 F.2d 565 191 U.S.App.D.C. 42 C & H TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., Daily Express, Inc., &Dallas & Mavis Forwarding Co., Inc., Petitioners,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION & United States of America,Respondents.Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co., Home TransportationCompany, Inc., Aero Trucking, Inc., Miller's MotorFreight, Inc., Wales Transportation,Inc., J. H. Rose Truck Li

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 9, 2015 Session MID-SOUTH MAINTENANCE INC., ET AL. v. PAYCHEX INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH140676 Jim Kyle, Chancellor ________________________________ No. W2014-02329-COA-R3-CV – Filed August 14, 2015 _____________

Susan J. Dlott, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 32) this securities fraud case. Defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that Plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ("PSLRA"). For the reasons that follow, *680the Court will

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

981 F.2d 261 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2150, 61 USLW 2451,123 Lab.Cas. P 10,473 MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOTIVE, AEROSPACE ANDAGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW),MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, UNIT OFLOCAL 878, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-1044. United States Court of Appeals,Six