⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Ira F. Fairfield and Linda K. Fairfield”

District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017-04-24 · Published · cited 0× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 1092; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62419
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE “[T]he future of our world revolves around public education. There’s nothing more important that we do” than “edu-cat[ing] our children.” (Doc. 1124, p, 180). That proposition, offered by a member of the Gardendale Board of Education, is perhaps the one point on which .all of the parties in this school desegregation case
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003-03-12 · Published · cited 69× · 258 F. Supp. 2d 576; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3786; 2003 WL 1089307
258 F.Supp.2d 576 (2003) In Re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA LITIGATION" This Document Relates to: All Cases Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants The Regents of The University of California, et al., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. No. MD-1446, CIV.A.H-01-3624.
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017-06-05 · Published · cited 3× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 810; 2017 WL 2427297; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85543
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sue E. Myerscough, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . This matter came before the Court on January 19, 2016, for a bench trial. The first phase of the bench trial was completed on February 17, 2016. The trial resumed, on October 26, 2016. The Court heard testimony on October 25-27, 2016 and November 2, 2016. The Plaintiff United States appeared by Assistant United States A
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002-12-19 · Published · cited 97× · 235 F. Supp. 2d 549; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25211
235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019-05-03 · Published · cited 1× · 373 F. Supp. 3d 978
HONORABLE KAREN NELSON MOORE, United States Circuit Judge, HONORABLE TIMOTHY S. BLACK, United States District Judge, HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WATSON, United States District Judge *992TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...994 A. General Overview of the Facts...994 B. Procedural History...1009 II
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00396-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/8/2015 7:07:05 AM