Cases

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This is a bruising commercial dispute between business rivals. When the eponymous plaintiff, Ira Green, Inc. (Green), repaired to the federal district court, it charged the defendant, Military Sales & Service Co. (MilSal), with tortious interference and defamation. After prodigious discovery and an acrimonious trial, the jury returned a take-nothing verdi

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On May 23, 2012, Big 3 Packaging, LLC (“B3P”) and Cot’n Wash, Inc. (“Cot’n Wash”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed suit in this district against Henkel Corporation, The Dial Corporation (“Dial”), and Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc. (collectively, “the Henkel defendants”) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,03

206 F.Supp.2d 702 (2002) INTERVEST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. S.G. COWEN SECURITIES CORP., Defendant. Nos. 98-CV-3278, 99-CV-5463. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 19, 2002. *703 *704 Michael K. Coran, Ira A. Rosenau, Klehr, Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ell

2023 IL App (5th) 210377 NOTICE Decision filed 02/14/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-21-0377 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ARCHFORD CAPITAL STRATEGIES, LLC, ) Appeal from the

[Cite as Acorn Development, L.L.C. v. Sanson Co., 2022-Ohio-2576.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ACORN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Nos. 110530 and 111003 v. : THE SANSON C

[Cite as Acorn Dev., L.L.C. v. Sanson Co., 2022-Ohio-2576.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ACORN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Nos. 110530 and 111003 v. : THE SANSON COMPANY

256 F.Supp.2d 249 (2003) CARPET GROUP INTERNATIONAL and Emmert Elsea, Plaintiffs, v. ORIENTAL RUG IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 95-5574(JAG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 28, 2003. *258 Glenn A. Mitchell, Esq, David U. Fierst, Esq, Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, L.L.P., Washi

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This case is before the court on the Government’s motion to dismiss 134 plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases allege that they were and are entitled to premium and overtime pay for regularly-scheduled overtime, Súnday and holiday hours during authorized leave from work under the “leave with pay” provisions of the Federal Employees

El Juez Asociado Señor Martínez Torres emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La parte peticionaria, el Sr. Giovanni Rodríguez Vélez, su esposa Gidalsy Rivera Hernández y la Sociedad Legal de Bienes Gananciales compuesta por ambos, nos solicitan la revisión de un dictamen del Tribunal de Apelaciones que confirmó una sentencia del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan, en la que se desestimó una dema

125 B.R. 981 (1991) In re Abdul W. KAZI, M.D., and Samina W. Kazi, Debtors. Stephen R. CLARK, Trustee, Movant, v. Abdul W. KAZI, M.D., and Samina W. Kazi, Debtors/Respondents. Bankruptcy No. BK 90-30166, Adv. No. 90-0164. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois. February 4, 1991. *982 Laura Grandy, Belleville, Ill., for

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Iván Díaz Carrasquillo Peticionario 2014 TSPR 75 v. 191 DPR ____ Hon. Alejandro García Padilla Recurrido Número del Caso: CT-2013-18 Fecha: 19 de junio de 2014 Oficina de la Procuradora General: Lcda. Margarita Mercado Echegaray Procuradora General Lcda. Mónica Cordero Vázquez

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

El Juez Asociado Señor Santana Becerra emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Este caso envuelve una impugnación del poder del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico para imponer y cobrar al demandante Dr. Carlos F. Maristany la contribución sobre donaciones objeto del litigio. Los hechos que sirven de base a la impugnación son los siguientes: *294

226 B.R. 56 (1998) In re RaeJean BONHAM, aka Jean Bonham, aka Jeannie Bonham, dba World Plus, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. F95-00897-HAR. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska. April 10, 1998. *57 *58 RaeJean Bonham, Fairbanks, AK, Debtor, Pro se. Cabot Christianson, Gary Spraker, Bundy & Chr

Foley, S. In a prior decision the Surrogate disposed of certain preliminary questions involving the construction of the will. (Matter of Walker, N. Y. L. J., May 26, 1944, p. 2040, col. 3.) The primary facts were stated in that decision. The testator, as donor, granted in his will certain powers of appointment to his daughter, Gertrude D. Walker. She exercised these powers by her will. There remain

ACCEPTED 06-15-00002-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 06-15-00002-CV