Cases

616 F.Supp.2d 461 (2009) IRON WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 PENSION FUND, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Situated Similarly, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT-BASED ASSET SERVICING AND SECURITIZATION, LLC, et al., Defendants. Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. 08 Civ. 10841 (JSR),

MEMORANDUM OPINION INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge. Pending before the court are the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, memorandum, affidavit and exhibits in support of said motion (docs. 94^96), defendants’ evidentiary submissions and opposition to said motion (docs. 102-104), the plaintiffs’ reply and evidence in support of the reply (docs. 107 and 108), the defendants’ sur-reply

EFiled: Dec 29 2023 10:38AM EST Transaction ID 71711228 Case No. 2023-0418-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FOX CORPORATION DERIVATIVE CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION C.A. No. 2023-0418-JTL OPINION ESTABLISHING LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE D

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Securities Litigation PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge: Pending before this Court are six class actions1 by purchasers of Goldman Sachs & Co. common stock2 alleging that Goldman Sachs & Co., and various of its officers and directors, violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making false and misleadin

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: Lead Plaintiff Pipefitters Union Local 537 Pension Fund (“Pipefitters”) and named Plaintiff City of Livonia Employees’ Retirement System (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendants Wyeth, Robert Essner, Joseph Mahady, Kenneth Martin, Bernard Poussot, Robert Ruffalo, Jr., and Ginger Constantine (“Defendants”), pursu

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge. Lead Plaintiff and proposed class representative Macomb County Employees’ Retirement System (“Macomb County” or “Lead Plaintiff’) and proposed additional class representative St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Pension System (“St. Clair,” and collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have moved to certify a class of those who purchased publicly-trade

714 F.Supp.2d 475 (2010) PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO. INC. et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 10841(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 1, 2010. *478 David R. Stickney, David A. Thorpe, Timothy Alan Delange, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Gross

*242ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS PURSUANT TO RULE 23(b)(3) WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff has filed a putative class action against defendants claiming violations of the Securities Exchange Act and alleging false and misleading statements relating to payments made to walnut growers. To the extent sta

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second *895Amended Complaint (Doc. 57). This suit is one of a myriad of similar suits across the country arising from the sale of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and the housi

OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Michael Goldemberg, Annie Le, and Howard Petlack (“Named Plaintiffs” or “Plaintiffs”) each bring consumer protection claims against Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (“Johnson & Johnson”) in this proposed class action under the laws of their home states: New York, California, and Florida, respectively. Pur

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. This securities action is a consolidation of four eases involving claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77i(a)(2), 77o, in connection with defendants’ sale of mortgage pass-through certificates by means of documents that allegedly contained untrue statements and material

*135 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. This is a purported securities class action brought under §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”).1 The issue before the Court is whether to grant Lead Plaintiffs2 motion to certify a cla

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs are suing Chinese vitamin C manufacturers for allegedly violating Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, by engaging in a cartel to fix prices and limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. The four main defendants are Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Jiangsu Jiangshan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Northeas

612 F.Supp.2d 594 (2009) In re RADIAN SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to: All Actions. Civil Action No. 07-3375. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 9, 2009. *596 David A. Rosenfeld, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, Melville, NY, Deborah R. Gross, Robert P. Frutkin, Law Offices Bernard M

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Richard Medoff v. Civil No. 09-cv-554-JNL Opinion No. 2016 DNH 029 CVS Caremark Corp., et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER In this securities class action, shareholders of CVS Caremark Corporation alleged that CVS Caremark and certain of its officers made fraudulent representations and omissions

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge In 2014, Brazil found itself embroiled in what has become a widely publicized scandal. Brazilian authorities launched an investigation (Operation "Lava Jato" or "Car Wash") into a sprawling bribery and kickback scheme. Construction and engineering conglomerates were accused of bribing government officials in order to secure lucrative contracts. Not initially implicated in the scandal, D

*588MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Resolving All Class Certification Issues and Related Objections MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This is a putative securities class action involving Countrywide Financial Corporation (“Countrywide Financial”) and some of its affiliated companies (collectively, “Countrywide”).

722 F.Supp.2d 875 (2010) EL CAMINO RESOURCES, LTD. and ePlus Group, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, Defendant. Case No. 1:07-cv-598. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 1, 2010. *879 John E. Anding, Thomas Vincent Hubbard, Drew Cooper & Anding, Grand Rapids, MI, John Albert Grah

753 F.Supp.2d 326 (2011) In re WACHOVIA EQUITY SECURITIES LITIGATION. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Plaintiff, v. Wachovia Corporation, et al., Defendants. FC Holdings AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., Defendants. In Re Wachovia Preferred Securities & Bond/Notes Litigation. Nos. 08 Civ. 6171(RJS), 09 Civ. 4473(RJS), 09 Civ. 5466(RJS), 09 Civ. 6351(RJS). <

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendants Larry Goldstone and Clarence G. Simmons and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed May 21, 2012 (Doc. 35)(“Goldstone & Simmons MTD”); (ii) the Defendant Jane Starrett’s Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of P