Cases

843 F.2d 501 Mollath (Linton)v.Ivey (Fred), City of Oakland, California, Federal DepositInsurance Corporation, Internal Revenue Service NOS. 87-1948, 87-1952 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. MAR 24, 1988 Appeal From: Bkrtcy.App. 9 1

59 Cal.App.4th 939 (1997) ALFRED WATTS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant and Respondent; THOMAS KENNELLY, Respondent and Real Party in Interest Docket No. A075649. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. November 6, 1997. *941 COUNSEL Ellen Mendelson fo

NIES, Chief Judge, concurring and dissenting-in-part. I concur with my colleagues that the subject complaint was timely filed. I dissent from the basis of decision in both the lead and concurring opinions. I do not agree that Rule 6(a) of the Court of Federal Claims may be invoked because “timely filing is not a prerequisite to federal jurisdiction.” This ruling would be con

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Megan K. Cavanagh Brian K. Zahra

Case: 20-12003 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 200 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-12003 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 4:19-cv-00300-RH-MJF; 4:19-cv-00304-RH-MAF KELVIN LEON JONES, ROSEMARY MCCOY,

Case: 20-12003 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 200 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-12003 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 4:19-cv-00300-RH-MJF; 4:19-cv-00304-RH-MAF KELVIN LEON JONES, ROSEMARY MCCOY,

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS THE GYM 24/7 FITNESS, LLC, and All Others FOR PUBLICATION Similarly Situated, March 31, 2022

990 F.Supp. 839 (1997) The ESTATE OF Joshua L. BROUHARD, Deceased, By and Through Sandra L. BROUHARD and Donald R. Brouhard, Co-Personal Representatives, Plaintiff, v. THE VILLAGE OF OXFORD and Oxford Township, Chief Gary Ford, Officer Robert Alonzi, Officer Gulda, Officer Ostrander and Other Unknown Officers, Defendants. No. 97-CV-72384-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Divisio

89 Cal.Rptr.2d 295 (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 196 Jack McLAUGHLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. A084730. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. September 27, 1999. Review Denied December 21, 1999. *297 Daniel E. Lu

305 F.2d 949 Benjamin BRAUNSTEIN and Diana Braunstein; Estate of Benjamin Neisloss, Deceased, Julia Neisloss and Russell Neisloss, Executors and Julia Neisloss; Harry Neisloss and Lillian Neisloss, Petitioners,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Nos. 256-258. Docket 27146-27148. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argu

KILKENNY, District Judge: Before us for review is the action of the District Court in granting summary judgments to plaintiff. Discovery procedures, including affidavits and interrogatories, were extensively employed. We affirm. Involved is the title and right to possession of lands located in California, west

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Bruce Inman ("Plaintiff") filed an amended civil rights complaint against Defendants S. Anderson ("Officer Anderson"), Guillermo Vasquez ("Officer Vasquez"), Dana Rannals ("Officer Rannals"), Pedro Zamora ("Officer Zamora"), Leo Moreno ("Officer Moreno"), the City of Capitola, Steven J. Moore ("ADA Moore"), and the County of Santa Cruz (collectively, "Defendants"). In his amended

MEMORANDUM ** Jeffrey Allen Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials denied him a prison transfer, were deliberately indifferent to his safety and medical needs, and retaliated against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Zimme

740 F.Supp.2d 1174 (2010) John Paul THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Robert HERNANDEZ, Board of Prison Terms Unknown Deputy Commissioner, Defendants. Civil No. 07-1141-WVG. United States District Court, S.D. California. September 13, 2010. *1176 John Paul Thomas, Lincoln, NE, pro se. Attorney General, State of California Office of th

795 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2011) Edwin Pascua CARAANG and Edna Gorospe Caraang, Plaintiffs, v. PNC MORTGAGE, etc., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 10-00594 LEK-BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. June 20, 2011. *1101 James H. Fosbinder, Ivey Fosbinder Fosbinder LLLC, A Limited Liability Law Company, Wailuku, HI, for Plaintiffs.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND ■ DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter came before the court on December 6,. 2016, for hearing of defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. Nos. 76, 78.) Attorney Michael Haddad appeared on behalf of plaintiff Lucy Atayde, successor in interest of dec

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 80, 83, 84, 90, 92, 93 WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge Currently before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Docket Nos. 80, 83) and plaintiffs motions for leave to amend, to compel, to challenge the Court’s jurisdiction, and to reconsider plain

OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, SUSTAINING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND PARTIES, AND CONTINUING ORDER OF REFERENCE DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Edward Burley, a Michigan prisoner representing himself, filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1

Filed 5/13/22 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 640 TENTH, LP et al., D079339 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020-00041316- CU-MC-CTL) GAVIN NEWSOM, as Governor, etc. et al., Defend

Filed 6/9/22 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 640 TENTH, LP, et al., D079339 (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020-00041316- Plaintiffs and Appellants, CU-MC-CTL) v.