Cases

Filed 4/25/25; Certified for publication 5/20/25 (order attached) Opinion following rehearing IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX MOVING OXNARD 2d Civ. Nos. B334636, FORWARD, INC., et al., B335866 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2022- Plainti

Filed 2/17/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CITY OF OXNARD, 2d Civ. No. B314601 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00539039-CU-MC-VTA) (Ventura

Filed 1/19/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CITY OF OXNARD, 2d Civ. No. B314601 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00539039-CU-MC-VTA) (Ventura County) v. AARON STARR, Defendant and Appellant. Voters pa

Filed 11/23/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CITY OF OXNARD, 2d Civil No. B312348 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00552428-CU-WM-VTA) (Ventura County) v. COUNTY OF VENTURA et al., Defendants and Respondent

Filed 12/14/21 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CITY OF OXNARD, 2d Civil No. B312348 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00552428-CU-WM-VTA) (Ventura

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. We affirm the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals 1 denying the claims of the City of Oxnard for payment, on behalf of the Department of the Navy, of a share of the cost overruns incurred by Oxnard in performance of Contract Nos. N62474-76-C-6511 and N62474-76-C-6512.

40 Cal.3d 1 (1985) 706 P.2d 285 218 Cal. Rptr. 672 BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OXNARD, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. L.A. 31886. Supreme Court of California. October 7, 1985. *2 COUNSEL Stanley E. Cohen, Dav

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOVING OXNARD FORWARD, No. 21-56295 INC., D.C. No. 2:20-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 04122-CBM-AFM v. OPINION MICHELLE ASCENSION, in her official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Oxnard, Defendant-Appellee. App

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOVING OXNARD FORWARD, No.21-56295 INC., D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:20-cv-04122- CBM-AFM v. LOURDES LOPEZ, in her official OPINION capacity as City Clerk for the City of Oxnard, Defendant-Appellee, and DOES, 1 through 25, inclu

Corrigan, J. Here, we hold that when a city employee uses a personal account to communicate about the conduct of public business, the writings may be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (CPRA or Act). 1 We overturn the contrary judgment of the Court of Appeal.

154 Cal.App.3d 526 (1984) 201 Cal. Rptr. 291 W. PATRICK RIGGS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OXNARD, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 69546. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. April 16, 1984. *528 COUNSEL Donald J. Parrish for Plaintiff and Appellant. K.D

105 Cal.Rptr.2d 214 (2001) 25 Cal.4th 165 19 P.3d 567 FRIENDS OF SIERRA MADRE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SIERRA MADRE et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. S085088. Supreme Court of California. March 29, 2001. As Modified May 2, 2001. *216 Brandt

Opinion KAUS, J. Appellant, developer and owner of an apartment complex in the City of Oxnard, appeals from a judgment upholding the city’s denial of a special use permit for the conversion of the apartments to condominium units. The primary issue is whether a city may—consistent with the requirements of due process—regulate the conversion of apartments to condom

126 Cal.App.3d 814 (1981) 179 Cal. Rptr. 159 ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OXNARD et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. 62070. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. November 16, 1981. *816 COUNSEL Hill, Wynne, Troop & Meisinger,

34 Cal.3d 733 (1983) 669 P.2d 948 195 Cal. Rptr. 361 SHELTER CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF OXNARD et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. L.A. 31609. Supreme Court of California. October 13, 1983. *734 COUNSEL Drummy, Garret

Filed 5/4/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX THEODORE P. KRACKE, 2d Civ. No. B300528 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2016- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00490376-CU-WM-VTA) (Ventura County) v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, Defendant and Appellant.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT J. K. J., individually, and successor No. 20-55622 in interest to the Deceased Aleah Jenkins, by and through his D.C. No. guardian-ad-litem Jeremy Hillyer, 3:19-cv-02123- Plaintiff-Appellant, CAB-RBB v. ORDER AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; AMENDED DAVID NISLET, in h

114 Cal.App.3d 317 (1981) 170 Cal. Rptr. 685 TRENT MEREDITH, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OXNARD, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 59339. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. January 6, 1981. *319 COUNSEL Nordman, Cormany, Hair & Compton, Michael C. O'

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT J. K. J., individually, and successor No. 20-55622 in interest to the Deceased Aleah Jenkins, by and through his D.C. No. guardian-ad-litem Jeremy Hillyer, 3:19-cv-02123- Plaintiff-Appellant, CAB-RBB v. OPINION CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; DAVID NISLET, in his individual ca

Filed 4/29/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, H050889 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 21CV391517) v. HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION et al., Defendant