⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JACOBS v. United States”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-3077 (TJK) UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Brandon Michael Jacobs, proceeding pro se, asserts that the United States, “Milt,” or “Big Brother” owes him $900 million “for t
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED JUL - 1 2020 BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS, ) ) Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 194 A.3d 913
Affirmed.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 0× · 182 A.3d 721
Affirmed
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 6/24/2020 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 584 F. App'x 70
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christina Jacobs appeals the district court’s order accepting, in part, the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the Government’s motion to dismiss her civil action, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 to 2680 (2012). We have revie
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 10 F. Supp. 3d 272; 2014 WL 1305068; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44095
RULING ON MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge. Makene Jacobs seeks to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Jacobs is confined at Williamsburg Federal Correctional Institution in Salters, South Carolina. On June 20, 2001, after a ten-day trial, a jury returned a guilty verdict against Jacobs for conspiracy to po
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-06-23 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 2869; 189 L. Ed. 2d 827; 82 U.S.L.W. 3733; 2014 WL 2807287; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4368
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 1953.Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-04-28 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 1953; 188 L. Ed. 2d 972; 82 U.S.L.W. 3630; 572 U.S. 1094; 2014 WL 1254819; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3019
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
FH.EB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOV 1 "9 2318 DANNY R. JACOBS ) C|erk, U.S. District and w ’ ) Bankruptcy Courts Petitioner, ) / ) l v. ) Civil Action No. 18~cv-02058 (UNA) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ` ) Respondents. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the court on its initial review of petitioner’s pro se “complaint” (“Compl.”), motion for release (“l\/lot.”), and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Petitioner is a North Caroli
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 1× · 981 A.2d 579; 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 457; 2009 WL 2957805
KRAMER, Associate Judge: Appellant Marcellus Jacobs pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana conditioned upon preserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the tangible evidence recovered from him in what he contends was an illegal seizure. He now appeals the trial court’s denial of that motion. We affirm. I. Offi
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 455 F. App'x 962
ORDER The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2006-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 1224; 126 S. Ct. 1454
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 831; 126 S. Ct. 53
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005-10-20 · Published · cited 2× · 886 A.2d 510; 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 545; 2005 WL 2779047
ORDER PER CURIAM. On consideration of pro se appellant’s letter requesting relief, construed as a motion to reissue judgment, it is ORDERED that the motion to reissue judgment is granted. The mandate issued on January 12, 2005, is hereby recalled and the opinion and judgment of November 10, 2004 (reported at 861 A.2d 15), is hereby vacated, to be reissued this date.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 1046; 126 S. Ct. 767
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1103; 125 S. Ct. 1007
543 U.S. 1103 JACOBSv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5517. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 93 Fed. Appx. 488; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases re
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 1015; 125 S. Ct. 1999
544 U.S. 1015 JACOBSv.UNITED STATES No. 04-9424. Supreme Court of United States. May 2, 2005. 1 C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 471. 2 Motion of petitioners for leav
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004-11-10 · Published · cited 7× · 861 A.2d 15; 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 582; 2004 WL 2534259
861 A.2d 15 (2004) Charles D. JACOBS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 00-CF-1648. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 26, 2002. Decided November 10, 2004. *16 Matthew W. Greene, appointed by the court, for appellant. Alex P. Shawe, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Ro
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1133
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.