Cases

Case: 11-13117 Date Filed: 10/18/2012 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 11-13117 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cv-00020-RWS SARAH JANE UNDERWOOD,

BARNES, Judge. Case Summary [1] F. John Rogers, as the personal representative of Paul Michalik, deceased, and R. David Boyer, as trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Jerry Chambers, (collectively “the Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s granting of a motion to strike and a motion for summary judgment filed by Angela Martin. We reverse and remand. Issues [2] The Ap

OPINION SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: The western Distinct Population Segment of the Steller sea lions (“wDPS”) live in the great northern Pacific Ocean region off Alaska, and they were declared endangered in 1997. More recently, in two of the seven sub-regions they inhabit, they have been experiencing population declines because they have been showing sign

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND ORDERING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Brian J. Martin and Yahmi Ñundley have filed the present lawsuit, as members of a putative class, alleging that the defendants violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA

*461 Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a); Military Pay Act, 10 U.S.C. §§ 204, 206; Discharge from Active Duty; Medical Evaluation; Documentation of Medical Treatment During Active Duty; Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance ¶¶ 7-2, 7-8, and 7-12; Army Regulations 40-400, 40-501, 635-40 and 635-200; Remand; Army Board for Correction

Agostini, J. The plaintiff, Jane Martin (Martin), alleges that she was sexually abused by the co-defendant, Robert E. Kelley (Kelley), a priest employed by the other co-defendant, the Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester (the Diocese). She alleges that on numerous occasions between 1969 and 1974, Kelley, a priest at the Notre Dame Parish in Southbridge, sexually abused her. Martin, who was between the ages of e

The defendants were tried together, and each was convicted of unlawful distribution of cocaine in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32A, and distribution of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32J. The Appeals Court reversed their convictions, concluding that “the repeated improper use of [Tony Martin’s] alias resulted in a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice.” Commonwealth v. Martin, 57 Mass. App.

Lenk, J. After trial by jury, the defendants, Tony Martin and Rudy Strickland, were each convicted of unlawful distribution of cocaine in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32A, and distribution of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 31J. The defendants appeal their convictions, with Martin asserting that the admission in evidence of his prior use of an alias constituted reversible error. Since we hol

793 F.Supp.2d 583 (2011) Isa MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Eric Pena, Richard Ortiz, Manuel Sepulveda, Robert Warshefskie, and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. No. 08-CV-5183 (ENV)(JO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 24, 2011. *584 Brett H. Kle

Opinion issued May 20, 2010. In The

105 P.3d 577 (2005) 209 Ariz. 531 David MARTIN, an individual, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Matt SCHROEDER and Jane Doe Schroeder, husband and wife; Grant Schroeder and Cathy Schroeder, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees. No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0092. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. February 9, 2005.

283 F.Supp.2d 1286 (2003) Brendan WILLIAMS, by His Mother and Next friend, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jim MARTIN, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Georgia Department of Human Resources, Defendant. Civil Action File No. 1:01-CV-3342-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 22, 2003. *1287 <

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 18-6091 AMANDA JANE WOLFE AND PETER E. BOERSCHINGER, PETITIONERS, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, RESPONDENT. Before GREENBERG, ALLEN, and FALVEY, Judges.

Opinion issued June 25, 2009 Opinion issued June 25, 2009 <

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Circuit Judge. Pro se petitioner John T. Martin appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Without requiring the federal warden, Edward Perez, to file a response, the district *801 court dismisse

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants, a certified class of “all children arrested on possible delinquency charges who are summoned to appear at the probation service in a Family Court building and are interrogated by members of the New York City Police Department’s Detective Squad” appeal from a decision and judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John

BRODY, Justice. This case requires us to resolve a custody dispute between Jane Doe I, Child’s natural mother, and Jane Doe, the natural mother’s former partner. During the course of Mother and Partner’s relationship, Mother conceived a child via artificial insemination. After the parties separated, Partner filed a petition to establish parentage, custody and visitation with Chi

*268 ANNUNZIATA, Judge. Jane H. Shooltz (wife) and Thomas C. Shooltz (husband) both appeal the equitable distribution order of the trial court. Wife contends the trial court erroneously valued the husband’s two businesses, erroneously reduced the monetary awa

450 Mich. 204 (1995) In re MARTIN MARTIN v. MARTIN Docket Nos. 99699, 99700, (Calendar No. 10). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued March 7, 1995. Decided August 22, 1995. Irving M. Stahl, guardian ad litem, for Michael Martin. Vlcko, Lane, Payne & Broder, P.C. (by Andrew J. Broder, Lynn Stevens Naoum, and Thomas

RANDALL, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff brought this diversity action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. After a bench trial, the district court rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff timely appealed. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse. I.