Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs, five current or former African American Baltimore City Fire Department employees, filed a Title VII employment suit alleging race discrimination against the Baltimore City Fire Department (“BCFD”) and the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (“City”). Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion for summar

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. On April 7, 2014, the Court held a hearing on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant City of San Antonio Fire Department (“Defendant” or “SAFD”) (“Mot.,” Dkt. # 29). Chris Pit-tard, Esq., represented Plaintiff Randy Jenkins (“Plaintiff” or “Jenkins”); Mark Kosanovich, Esq., represented Defendan

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1124 HECTOR M. JENKINS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. HOUSING COURT DEPARTMENT, City of Boston Division, a Section of the Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant, Appellee, JEFFREY WINIK, First Justice of The Boston Housing Court; MICH

WILLIE JENKINS * NO. 2022-CA-0031 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL NEW ORLEANS POLICE * DEPARTMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CITY C

LANCE MARTIN * NO. 2021-CA-0070 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL DEPARTMENT OF FIRE * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CITY CIVIL SER

MARLAN HYDE, SR. * NO. 2025-CA-0114 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL NEW ORLEANS FIRE * DEPARTMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CITY C

[Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2025-Ohio-2143.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114022 v. : LASHAWN JENKINS, :

Case: 24-10724 Document: 84-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 19, 2025

[Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2025-Ohio-4447.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-240565 TRIAL NO. B-2402300 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : DESHAWN JENKINS, :

KENNETH PREVOST * NO. 2024-CA-0114 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CITY OF NEW ORLEANS * FIRE DEPARTMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM THE OFFI

KENNETH PREVOST * NO. 2024-CA-0115 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CITY OF NEW ORLEANS * FIRE DEPARTMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM THE OFFI

317 Ga. 585 FINAL COPY S23A0534. JENKINS v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Presiding Justice. The question in this case is whether Larry Jenkins’s unequivocal statement that he would not talk to law enforcement without a lawyer was a valid invocation of his Miranda1 rights. Agreeing with the State, the trial court concluded that the statement came at a time that Jenkins was not being interrogated and at which no interrogation was imminent, and thus it was “anticipatory” a

*265 HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Appellant Randy Jenkins filed suit against the City of San Antonio Fire Department (“Fire Department”), alleging discrimination on the basis of race and age, and retaliation, in violation of Title VII. Because Jenkins’s complaint was, in part, untimely, and failed to establish

People v Jenkins (2023 NY Slip Op 02031) People v Jenkins 2023 NY Slip Op 02031 Decided on April 20, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

J-S30036-24 2024 PA Super 292 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : WALTER JENKINS :

[Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2020-Ohio-5409.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 28595 Plaintiff-Appellee :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GARY V. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-3757 (CKK) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 9, 2023) This matter is before the Court on sua sponte review of pro se Plaintiff

Judge Regina Bartholomew-Woods Defendant, Dominique Jenkins (hereinafter referred to as Defendant), appeals the jury's verdict finding him guilty of manslaughter and the district court's October 20, 2017 judgment sentencing him to thirty-eight (38) years imprisonment at hard labor. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Defendant's conviction and sentence. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On D

07/22/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 8, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. REGINALD JENKINS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 21-00359 James Jones, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 10/11/2019 09:06 AM CDT - 676 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. JENKINS Cite as 303 Neb. 676 S