⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JOAN V GIDDINGS”

Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995-11-21 · Published · cited 2× · 543 N.W.2d 15; 214 Mich. App. 383
214 Mich. App. 383 (1995) 543 N.W.2d 15 JOAN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC v. CHECK Docket No. 167614. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted October 11, 1995, at Detroit. Decided November 21, 1995, at 9:25 A.M. Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn (by Linn A. Hynds, William D. Sargent, and Barbara A. Van Zanten),<
Hicks v. Arthurpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995-03-07 · Published · cited 15× · 878 F. Supp. 737; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2709; 1995 WL 100541
878 F.Supp. 737 (1995) Schree HICKS, Angelique Giddings, Sandra White and Willie Mae Lewis v. Robert ARTHUR, Marsha O'Hara, Robert Fishman and Resources for Human Development. Civ. A. No. 93-3160. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 7, 1995. Don Bailey, Harrisburg, PA, for plaintiffs. *738 Joan R. Sheak,
Pickett v. Brownpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991-04-15 · Published · cited 7× · 569 N.E.2d 706; 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 602; 1991 WL 59783
569 N.E.2d 706 (1991) Kenneth PICKETT and Jane Pickett Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. Joan BROWN and Robert Brown Appellees (Defendants below). No. 06A01-9009-CV-363. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. April 15, 1991. *707 William G. Brown, Brazil, for appellants. Lawrence D. Giddings, Giddings, Whitsitt &
Hicks v. Arthurpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995-06-15 · Published · cited 8× · 891 F. Supp. 213; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8344; 1995 WL 377160
891 F.Supp. 213 (1995) Schree HICKS, Angelique Giddings, Sandra White and Willie Mae Lewis v. Robert ARTHUR, Marsha O'Hara, Robert Fishman and Resources for Human Development. Civ. A. No. 93-3160. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 15, 1995. *214 Don Bailey, Harrisburg, PA, Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, PA,
Supreme Court of Florida · 2015-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 176 So. 3d 1273; 2015 WL 6019364
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-1730 ____________ THE FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION — SCHARRER v. FUNDAMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. [October 15, 2015] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to rule 10-9.1 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar Rules), and this Court’s decision in Goldberg v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp.,
Hicks v. Arthurpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 159 F.R.D. 468; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222; 1995 WL 27408
MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants. Defendants make two main objections to the Interrogatories; first, that statistical evidence is irrelevant to plaintiffs’ claims and second, that they do not have the race information sought by plaintiffs and could not gather it without excessive burden.</
Hicks v. Arthurpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994-01-31 · Published · cited 29× · 843 F. Supp. 949; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1026; 1994 WL 45601
843 F.Supp. 949 (1994) Schree HICKS, Angelique Giddings, Sandra White, Lea M. Millner, Willie Mae Lewis, Jordan White and Nathaniel White, Plaintiffs, v. Robert ARTHUR, Marsha O'Hara, Robert Fishman, Sheryl Moyer, and Resources For Human Development, Inc., Defendants. No. 93-CV-3160. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 31, 1994.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 1984-08-30 · Published · cited 38× · 677 S.W.2d 702; 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 6109
677 S.W.2d 702 (1984) Frank C. ANDERSON and wife, Joan S. Anderson, Appellants, v. CLAJON GAS COMPANY and Clayco Pipeline Company, Appellees. No. 01-83-0455-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston First District. August 30, 1984. *703 Sidney Levine, Sealy, for appellants. Tom Scott, Bullock, Scott & Neisig, C. Medford O
Wich v. Flemingpublic domain
Texas Supreme Court · 1983-04-06 · Published · cited 42× · 652 S.W.2d 353; 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 312; 1983 Tex. LEXIS 291
652 S.W.2d 353 (1983) Joan Hohlt WICH, et al., Petitioners, v. Marian W. FLEMING, Executrix of the Estate of Mabel Giddings Wilkin, Deceased, Respondents. No. C-1334. Supreme Court of Texas. April 6, 1983. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1983. Rehearing Denied July 6, 1983. *354 Fulbright & Jaworski
Soneeya v. Spencerpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-03-29 · Published · cited 9× · 851 F. Supp. 2d 228; 2012 WL 1057625; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43542
MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. 1. Introduction Katheena Soneeya is a male-to-female transsexual currently serving a natural life sentence in the custody of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC). She1 has been incarcerated since 1982, and is currently housed at MCI-Shirley, a medium security male prison. She is suing Defendant f
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-05-09 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01087-CV TIMOTHY CASTRO, JR., Appellant, V. MARGARET CASTRO, Appellee. On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001-07-16 · Published · cited 16× · 258 F.3d 720
258 F.3d 720 (8th Cir. 2001) SHELLY REIMER; RICHARD DUYSEN; CHERYL RASMUSSEN; CARLA MYRUM; SHERYL ROESLER; LINDA FUGLEBERG; BETTE J. NELSON; LYNNE HONRUD; ELLEN LODIN; DALE HAROLD MYRUM; CAROL J. BUTH; VICKY PALLUCK; MARIANNE P. KALIN; JOAN L. SHEPEL; TAMARA JO COOK; YVETTE R. JOHNSON; BELINDA SCHMIDT; LISA PUKLICH; MURRAY MOEN; DEBORAH J. ANDERSON; JULIE KAY BUTH; LYNETTE JENSEN; JUDY REHDER; CONNIE BRUSE; DEEDRA A. WHALEN; JOHN FREEMAN; SHARON R.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019-06-28 · Published · cited 7× · 213 A.3d 417
Justice Flaherty, for the Court. This protracted squabble among siblings reaches us after a decade of litigation. At issue are amendments to an inter vivos trust and gifts of interest in a family limited partnership that was established by Augusta Hathaway during the 1990s in an effort to limit the tax liability to her estate. A trial was held in December 2014, after
Kosilek v. Spencerpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-09-04 · Published · cited 13× · 889 F. Supp. 2d 190; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124758; 2012 WL 3799660
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM WOLF, District Judge. I. SUMMARY............................................................196 II. THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS.......................................205 III. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.....................212 AKosilek has a Gender Identity Disorder................
Fields v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-08-05 · Published · cited 66× · 653 F.3d 550; 89 A.L.R. 6th 841; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16152; 2011 WL 3436875
653 F.3d 550 (2011) Andrea FIELDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. Judy P. SMITH, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 10-2339, 10-2466. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 7, 2011. Decided August 5, 2011. *552 John A. Knight (argued), Attorney, Roge
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRAZIER CAUDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action 08-00205 (HHK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Following a jury trial in this case, verdicts were returned for plaintiffs Frazier C
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-09-01 · Published · cited 4× · 825 F. Supp. 2d 73; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98627; 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 306; 2011 WL 4102272
825 F.Supp.2d 73 (2011) Frazier CAUDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-00205 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 1, 2011. *74 John Peter Relman, Jennifer I. Klar, Katherine A. Gillespie, Megan Cacace, Relman, Dane & Colfax, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 1990-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 785 S.W.2d 840; 1990 WL 2404
785 S.W.2d 840 (1990) CALDWELL NATIONAL BANK, Appellant, v. Lois O'NEIL, et al., Appellees. No. 08-88-00254-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. January 17, 1990. Rehearing Overruled March 7, 1990. *842 Lawrence R. Scroggins, Joan E. Scroggins, Caldwell, for appellant. Robert B. Snell, Lamesa, for appel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-2413 ___________ Shelly Reimer; Richard Duysen; * Cheryl Rasmussen; Carla Myrum; * Sheryl Roesler; Linda Fugleberg; Bette J.* Nelson; Lynne Honrud; Ellen Lodin; * Dale Harold Myrum; Carol J. Buth; * Vicky Palluck; Marianne P. Kalin; * Jo
Fleming v. Wichpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982-03-25 · Published · cited 2× · 638 S.W.2d 31; 1982 Tex. App. LEXIS 5224
SAM ROBERTSON, Justice. This is an appeal from a summary judgment of the county court of Burleson County denying probate of the purported last will and testament of Dr. Mabel Giddings Wilkin. We reverse and order the will admitted to probate. Mabel Giddings Wilkin, a single woman with no children who was a physician practicing psychiatry during her professional career, was 83 years of age at the time of her