Cases

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellants Jose Luis Rodriguez-Martinez (“Rodríguez”) and Joel Santini-Men-dez (“Santini”) were sentenced in the United States District Court of Puerto Rico to terms of eighty-eight months and seventy months, respectively, for aiding and abetting the attempted possession of narcotics with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, and aiding and

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. *104In this case, we consider whether the trial court erred in failing to apply the one-satisfaction rule and award a nonsettling defendant settlement credits. We hold that the one-satisfaction rule applies to this case, and the trial court therefore erred in denying the nonsettling defendant th

*356ORDER Joel Martinez-Sanchez has filed a direct appeal from his conviction and 72-month sentence for returning to the United States without permission after removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The defendant’s appointed lawyer believes the case is frivolous and seeks to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We ev

Opinion filed March 21, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ Nos. 11-22-00039-CR & 11-22-00040-CR __________ JOEL LUNA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 70th District Court

ACCEPTED 13-15-00019-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/11/2015 1:06:02 PM

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Alejandro Degante-Galeno, Alberto Jesus Martinez-Miranda, Manuel Gomez-Batana, and Isidro Degante-Gale-no stand convicted after guilty pleas of one count of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act in furtherance of a prostitution enterprise. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1952. Each defendant was sentenced principally to an above-Guidelines, statutory-maximum term of 60 months’ imprisonment, and each argues on appeal

*1288 PER CURIAM: I. Defendants/Appellants (the “Defendants”) Joel G. Audain (“Audain”), Fernando Burgos-Martinez (“Burgos”), Reginald Molin (“Molin”), Luckner Guillaume (“Guillaume”), and Marc Valme (“Valme”) appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to import coca

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER MARCOS E. LÓPEZ, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Procedural History On January 12, 2010, a second amended complaint (the “complaint”) was filed in the instant action against defendants Jorge Estevez-Martinez (“Estevez”), Herminio Martínez (“Martínez”), Carlos Ruiz (“Ruiz”), Monserrate Carrero Candelaria (“Carrero”), and the Municipality of Añasco by the following p

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 21, 2024 No. 04-23-00334-CR IN RE CERVANTES, et al. Original Proceeding 1 ORDER 1 This proceeding arises out of eighty-five civil bond fo

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00334-CR IN RE CERVANTES, et al. Original Proceeding 1 1 This proceeding arises out of eighty-five civil bond forfeiture cases involving the State of Texas and the following defend

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Canal Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. #26. The underlying lawsuit giving rise to this action involves a 2008 collision between a tractor-trailer and a passenger vehicle. In this ac

NUMBER 13-18-00529-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Per Curiam Order Relator McAllen Hospitals,

NUMBER 13-14-00323-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. de C.V., OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS, AND OSA INTERNATIONAL On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

697 F.2d 1297 30 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 225,31 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 50,30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,128Joaquin Moreles BONILLA, Armando Cardenas, Enrique Cardenas,Heliodoro Cardenas, Benjamin Ceja, Jose Guzman, Jose Lopez,Luis Magallon, Octavio Marquez, Raul Mendez, GilbertoPalafox, Joel Pinedo, Felix R. Sanchez, Jesus Sanchez,Curtis Stredic, individually and on behalf of all otherssimilarly situated, Plaintiffs in Interve

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO

NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) [DE 42], filed herein on December 14, 2015 by Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Company (“Chase & Co”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase Bank”), JPMorgan Chase, and Chase Manhattan

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Five defendants appeal their various convictions for racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, murder and drug trafficking. Four of the defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and one received a prison term of 262 months. All of the charged conduct arises out of the defendants’ participation in the Milwauke

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: Jesus Enrique-Ascencio pleaded guilty to one count of illegally' reentering the country after a prior removal. He appeals the 16-level sentence enhancement he received under Section 2L1.2 of the federal Sentencing Guidelines for a prior drug trafficking conviction, contending that this conviction was not “a drug trafficking offense for which