Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1756 JOHN DOE, formerly known as JANE DOE, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. ERIC HOLCOMB, in his offic

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. A federal district judge issued an injunction that blocks the State of Wisconsin from conducting a judicially supervised criminal investigation into the question whether certain persons have violated the state’s campaign-finance laws. The court did this despite 28 U.S.C. § 2283, the Anti-Injunction Act, which provides: “A court of the United States ma

OPINION Patrick A. Pirtle, Justice Pursuant to an open plea of guilty, Appellant, Eric Reginald Woods, was convicted of possession of cocaine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams, with intent to deliver, in a drug-free zone, enhanced by a prior felony conviction.1 Appellant entered a plea of true to the enhancement paragraph2 a

30 So.3d 362 (2009) John Albert WOODS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2007-KA-01279-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. September 22, 2009. Rehearing Denied December 15, 2009. Certiorari Denied March 18, 2010. *363 G. Eric Geiss, attorney for appellant. Office of

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION December 11, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:10 a.m. v No. 342424 Mecost

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Re: Docket No. 73) EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendant Google Ine.’s (“Google”) Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by Plaintiff Rick Woods (“Woods”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. See Docket No. 73. Woods filed written oppos

MEMORANDUM *** Because this court today denies appellant Eamma Jean Woods’ petition for review of the Order of Removal pending against her in a companion case, Woods v. Holder, No. 08-70936, 2010 WL 1174614 (9th Cir.2010), we dismiss as moot this appeal challenging the bond determination made by an Immigration Judge. DISMISSED. dispos

PER CURIAM. We review de novo the trial court’s interpretation of a restrictive covenant. Concluding that the trial court incorrectly interpreted the covenant, we reverse. After installing a new septic drain field, which all but destroyed the landscaping in his front yard, Appellant redesigned the landscape to include “hardscape” features, vegetation, and mulch, but no grass. He submitted a plan

MEMORANDUM *** Because this court today denies appellant Eamma Jean Woods’ petition for review of the Order of Removal pending against her in a companion case, Woods v. Holder, No. 08-70936, 2010 WL 1174614 (9th Cir.2010), we dismiss as moot this appeal challenging the bond determination made by an Immigration Judge. DISMISSED. dispos

Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. In 2002 a Greyhound bus struck and killed Claudia Zvunca in Colorado. Her daughter, Cristina Zvunca, witnessed the accident. Cristina was seven at the time. Now an adult, she is the administrator of her mother's estate. In 2016 Cristina settled all claims against Greyhound and other potentially responsible persons for approximately $5 million. But Tiberiu Kle

Kanne, Circuit Judge. John Crane, Inc., as a manufacturer of products containing asbestos, has been sued many times for injuries caused by exposure to asbestos. Now it claims some of those suits were part of a conspiracy to defraud the company. It filed lawsuits in the Northern District of Illinois against two law firms and their lawyers who brought some of those injury suits. Because t

People v Woods (2025 NY Slip Op 04261) People v Woods 2025 NY Slip Op 04261 Decided on July 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected

Lundberg Stratton, J. Today we examine the validity of R.C. 2967.28, Ohio’s post-release control statute. The court of appeals held that the statute was unconstitutional in that it violated the separation of powers doctrine and the Due Process Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. I HISTORY &

146 P.3d 319 (2006) 341 Or. 549 Carol Lee WOODS, Petitioner on Review, v. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a Carl's Jr. Restaurant, Respondent on Review. (CC No. 0209-09609; CA A123470; SC S53160). Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 12, 2006. Decided October 26, 2006. William

693 N.E.2d 333 (1998) 181 Ill.2d 512 230 Ill.Dec. 204 Yvonne WOODS, Special Adm'r of the Estate of Eric Woods, Deceased, Appellee, v. Todd COLE, Appellant. No. 82895. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 19, 1998. *334 Barbara Fritsche, Rammelkamp, Bradney, Kuster, Keaton, Fritsche &

People v Woods (2022 NY Slip Op 03407) People v Woods 2022 NY Slip Op 03407 Decided on May 25, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN TEIXEIRA; STEVE NOBRIGA; No. 13-17132 GARY GAMAZA; CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., (CGF); SECOND D.C. No. AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., 3:12-cv-03288- (SAF); CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WHO FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES, (CAL-FFL), Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as

[1] OPINION [2] This matter came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing all *Page 374 parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case the defendant, Cynthia Kay Winsor (Winsor), has appealed from a Family Court order requiring her to relinquish custody of two of her children, Joseph Kelly Woods and Lisa Woods, to the plaintiff, Joseph W. Woods (Woo

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. After Eric Godwin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to possess cocaine base with the intent to distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, he was sentenced to 120 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release. In this appeal, he claims that the district court violated Rule 11 in accepting his guilty plea and that his counsel

People v Woods (2018 NY Slip Op 05951) People v Woods 2018 NY Slip Op 05951 Decided on August 29, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4