⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JOHN W. CLARK”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2003-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 23, 2003 In The Court of Appeals</
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2003-05-09 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 9, 2003 In The Court of Appeals For the First District of Texas ________
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 96-CA-00765-SCT JOHN W. CLARK v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/10/96 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KATHY KING JACKSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: D. NEIL HARRIS, SR. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: JOHN A. BANAHAN
District Court, D. Maryland · 2014-06-27 · Published · cited 1× · 28 F. Supp. 3d 435; 2014 WL 2925260; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88886
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. I. Background Plaintiffs Stacey Veney, Torres Savage, Emory Rhyne, Robert King, and Melvin Brunson filed this suit seeking unpaid wages allegedly due to them under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and the Maryland Wage and Hour Law (“MWHL”), Md.Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. §§
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 5× · 253 So. 3d 297
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. During Fiscal Year 2017, Governor Phil Bryant directed State Fiscal Officer Laura Jackson to reduce the budgets of various state agencies. In response, State Representative Bryant W. Clark and State Senator John Horhn brought a declaratory-judgment action against the Governor in Hinds County Chancery Court. They sought preliminary and permanent i
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 16, 2015 Session ROBERT CLARK v. JOHN WERTHER, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 14C72 Carol Soloman, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2014-00844-COA-R3-CV – Filed September 27, 2016 ___________________
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-10-20 · Published · cited 5× · 143 A.D.3d 1069; 39 N.Y.S.3d 310
Clark, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Connerton, J.), entered December 11, 2014, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of a son (born in 2002). Pur
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019-02-14 · Published · cited 15× · 567 S.W.3d 565
OPINION OF THE COURT BY CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON *568A circuit court jury found John Daniel Clark ("JD") guilty of murder and two counts of tampering with physical evidence. The jury recommended a sentence of 35 years' imprisonment, which the trial court adopted, entering judgment accordingly. JD now appeals the judgment as a matter of right,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004-01-06 · Published · cited 5× · 354 F.3d 187; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 79; 2004 WL 27715
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellants Keith Beightol and John Frank Clark appeal a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lynch, J.), refusing to abstain from adjudicating their lawsuit against defendant-appellees UBS PaineWebber Inc., Gary C. Winnick, and John W. Lang pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(2), and declining to rema
Clark v. Metalpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 571 S.W.3d 700
PER CURIAM. St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum fo
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District NORTHERN DIVISION KEITH W. LAY, ET UX. ) No. ED111508 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) Knox County vs.
Clark v. Colemanpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018-08-14 · Published · cited 1× · 335 F. Supp. 3d 818
Jackson L. Kiser, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Sheriff Dan Smith [ECF No. 37], Rob Coleman [ECF No. 39], and Geri Hazelwood [ECF No. 41]. All motions were fully briefed by the parties, and I heard *822oral argument on July 12, 2018. Having reviewed the pl
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974-05-16 · Published · cited 333× · 497 F.2d 1206; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8607
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Larry G. Potter filed a complaint against John W. Clark, Sheriff of Vermilion County, Illinois for money damages, invoking jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint is predicated upon the alleged deprivation of rights resulting from the following: excessive bail pending trial; cruel and unusual punishment while in custody in lieu of bail; denial
Clark v. Kinseypublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 558 S.W.3d 573
Angela T. Quigless, J. Gregory Kinsey ("Kinsey") appeals from the trial court's partial order and judgment granting Russell Clark's ("Clark") motion to dismiss Kinsey's counterclaim seeking an award of attorney's fees. On appeal, Kinsey argues the trial court erred in dismissing his motion and counterclaim for attorney's fees against Clark, and failing to award him attorney's fees pursuant to the prevailing party fee shifting provis
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED LOUIS SPAGNUOLO, JAY LEWIS FARROW, AND FARROW LAW, P.A.,, Appellants, Case Nos. 5D21-1324 5D21
State v. Clarkpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 Ohio 1046; 108 N.E.3d 1215
Baldwin, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, Matteo J. Clark, appeals the decision of the Delaware County Court of Common denying his motion to suppress the results of a urine test. Appellee is the state of Ohio. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND THE CASE {¶ 2} Trooper Scott Tallman responded to the scene of an accident on November 2, 2016 and encou
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 16, 2001 MICHAEL W. CLARK v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-46024 James K. Clayton, Jr., Judge No. M2000-02092-CCA-R3-PC - Filed July 3, 2001 The petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-convicti
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 545 S.W.3d 428
ROGER A. PAGE, JUSTICE The primary issue in this appeal is whether a surviving spouse maintains priority to file a wrongful death action when the decedent's child has also filed a wrongful death action in which the child alleges that the surviving spouse negligently caused the decedent's death. The trial court dismissed the daughter's wrongful death complaint, but the Court of Appeals
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-04-22 · Published · cited 0× · 431 S.W.3d 534; 2014 WL 1609690; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 442
NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, P.J. This is an appeal from the reinstatement of driving privileges to John Matthew Clark. The elements of a refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test are: (1) whether or not the person was arrested or stopped; (2) whether or not the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person was driving a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated or drugged con