Cases

1 P.3d 500 (2000) 167 Or. App. 446 In the Matter of Jacara Murelle Ahlgren-Stillman, a Minor Child. STATE ex rel. STATE OFFICE FOR SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES; Jacara Murelle Ahlgren-Stillman; and Laura Ahlgren, Respondents, v. Donald E. STILLMAN, aka Donnie Stillman, Appellant. In the Matter of Keith Alexander Stillman, a Minor Child. State ex rel. State Office for Services to Children and Families; Keit

209 F.Supp.2d 185 (2002) Danny B. STILLMAN, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al. Defendants. No. CIV. 01-1342(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 10, 2002. *186 *187 Mark Steven Zaid, Esq., Lobel, Novins & Lamont, Washington, D.C., for Danny B. Stillman.</

OPINION WILLIAM J. MARTINI, United States District Judge Plaintiffs in this case worked as Assistant Store Managers (“ASMs”) for Office Depot during a period ranging from early 2000 to July of 2013. Seeking to bring claims on behalf of themselves and other ASMs, they allege that Office Depot’s method for paying overtime violated state and federal wage and hour laws. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Plaintiffs

BROTMAN, Judge Presently before the Court is the summary judgment motion of intervening defendants Antonio Godinez and Bonnie Godinez ("the Godinezes") and intervening defendants Paul Due and Genevieve Due ("the Dues") in which defendants Andrew Stillman and Joy Stillman ("the Stillmans") join, the summary judgment motion of intervening defendant Ethlyn Hall ("Hall"), the cross-motion of plaintiff Peter Bay Owners A

744 F.Supp.2d 548 (2010) William DiCAPRIO-CUOZZO, #1121972, Petitioner, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent. Case No. 2:10cv157. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. October 12, 2010. *549 William Jay DiCaprio-Cuozzo, Burkeville, VA, pro se. Kathleen

490 F.Supp.2d 694 (2007) Robert Stacy YARBROUGH, Petitioner, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:05cv368. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. May 30, 2007. *695 *696 Christopher DeCoy Parrott, Frank Nash Bilis

729 N.W.2d 182 (2007) 2007 WI 32 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Gary A. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2005AP573-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued September 13, 2006. Decided March 21, 2007. *184 For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by M

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 16, 2010 Decided June 28, 2011 Reissued September 22, 2011 No. 09-5399 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, APPELLEE v. CHARLES JOHNSON, JR., APPELLEE CHRIS BENYO, APPELLANT

288 Wis.2d 718 (2005) 2006 WI App 15 709 N.W.2d 491 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,[†] v. Gary A. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2005AP573-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 14, 2005. Decided December 14, 2005. On behalf of the defendant-appellant, th

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: In this civil enforcement action, a jury found Christopher Benyo aided and abetted a securities fraud by his former employer PurchasePro.com, Inc,, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78t(e). The district court fined Benyo $35,000 and barred him from serving as an officer or director

949 F.Supp. 1303 (1996) Ray SOUTHWELL, Plaintiff, v. The SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, Defendant. No. 1:95-CV-444. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 30, 1996. *1304 Mark D. Osterman, Ithaca, MI, for Plaintiff. Jon R. Muth, Miller Johnson Snell & Cummiskey, Grand Rapids, MI, for Def

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA” or “Defendant”), and the oral Motion to Amend the Complaint, made by plaintiff Mark Johnson (“Plaintiff’ or “Johnson”). Oral argument has taken place, and the motions are now ripe for decision. I. Factual and Pro

365 P.2d 369 (1961) Pauline Belva Farrand GRAY and Earsil Basil Farrand, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Beula G. STILLMAN, Defendant in Error. No. 38693. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 26, 1961. Edward C. Montgomery, Fairview, Lewis G. Mosburg, Jr., Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error. *370 John B. Doolin, Alva, for defe

890 F.Supp. 507 (1995) Sinclair L.D. JOHNSON, t/a S.L.D. Johnson Marketing/Advertising and t/a S.L.D. Johnson Marketing/Advertising, Inc., Plaintiff, v. AUTOMOTIVE VENTURES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-0049-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. June 21, 1995. *508 Michael F. Urbanski, Wood

*471DEITS, C. J. The State Office for Services to Children and Families (SCF) appeals from judgments denying its petitions to terminate mother’s and father’s parental rights to their child, D. SCF argues that it presented clear and convincing evidence that mother and father are unfit and that termination is in D’s best int

ORDER MILLER, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiff in this case alleges that on June 25, 1991 he was injured as a result of the failure of a hydraulic cylinder manufactured by the defendant Standex International Corporation and/or Custom Hoists, Inc. and a component part of the Dorsey dump trailer being operated by the plaintiff. During the course of the litigation, counsel for the def

12 P.3d 983 (2000) 170 Or. App. 287 In the Matter of Rene Deloris Hammons, Jr., a Minor Child. STATE ex rel. STATE OFFICE FOR SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent, v. David Doyle HAMMONS, Appellant. (97-70045; CA A108365) Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 15, 2000. Decided October 4, 2000.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: Two years ago, in 3M Company v. Browner, 17 F.3d 1453 (D.C.Cir.1994), we held that the five-year statute of limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 2462 applies not only to judicial proceedings but also to administrative proceedings. In this case, we decide that a Securities a

This case is an appeal from a jury verdict in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. Defendant-appellant, William Johnson (defendant), and three others were indicted on 12 counts each resulting from a robbery in North Royalton in January 1979. Defendant and one other codefendant, Charles Roberts, were tried together and were represented jointly by the same lawyer. After the trial court directed out one count of attempted rape against each man, a jury found both Johnson and Rober

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT This is an action for recovery of unpaid rents and for restitution of premises. The premises in issue is Unit #1 located in the Island Inn, a licensed “hotel, guesthouse and restaurant,” rented to defendant on a month to month basis. When the matter first came on for trial on July 15, 1977, this Court dismissed the action on defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 41(b) F.R.C.P., on the