Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARCUS DEANGELO JONES, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 06-461 (RMU) : v. : Document No.: 17 : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

601 F.Supp.2d 297 (2009) Marcus DeAngelo JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-461 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 10, 2009. *298 Marcus DeAngelo Jones, Memphis, TN, pro se. Alan Burch, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for De

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Petition for rehearing denied. *367Former decision, 562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 687, 178 L. Ed. 2d 490, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9128.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant United States of America's motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND This Jones Act case arises out of an alleged slip-and-fall aboard the M/V CAPE KNOX, a vessel owned by the United

Michael F. Urbanski, United States District Judge This matter comes before the court on a motion for a judgment of acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29. At the close of the government's evidence at trial, defendants Michael Dove and Terrance Brown moved the court for acquittal of Counts Three through Eight of the indictment on the basis of improper venue. ECF Nos. 849, 852.1 For the reas

PER CURIAM: Arnulfo Chapa, a federal prisoner, filed a suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) alleging that he had tendered two boxes of personal items to employees of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) prior to being transferred from one correctional facility to another, but that only one box of his belongings was given to him

ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS, DOC. 33, AND AMENDED MOTION TO SUPPRESS. DOC. 53. DEFENDANT’S REQUEST THAT THE COURT SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DERIVED FROM A NETWORK INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE SEARCH WARRANT IS DENIED. THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Suppress, doc. 33, and Amended Motion to Suppress. Doc. 53. Therein, Defe

SUMMARY ORDER Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Petitioner-Appellant Zheng argues that the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) erred in denying his motion for a continuance of deportation proceedings because, at the time the continuance was denied, he had a pending adjustment of status application and was eligible for adjustment of status. The IJ found that Zhen

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge Debra Jones, Arden C. Post, and the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservations (collectively, “Jones”), appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“CFC”) dismissing (1) Jones’s claims for damages against the United States for-failure to state a claim under the 1868 Treaty between the United States and the Ute Tribe, and (

*851DECISION AND ORDER William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge In this action Plaintiff Karen Jones alleges that the Department of Veterans Affairs was negligent when it allowed a rolling chair to be present in the. carpeted waiting room of a clinic it operated in Appleton, Wisconsin. This court denied the Defendants’ motion to dismiss because it was concei

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is hereby DENIED. Fa Gui Ni, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention A

5 U.S.C. §§ 5544(a) & 5546(a) — Sunday Premium Pay Statute; Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), RCFC 23(a) Class Action, RCFC 23(b). Class Actions Maintainable, RCFC 23 (c) Class Certification Order. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION BRADEN, Judge. This Memorandum Opinion And Order resolves Plaintiff

Claim by prisoner of improper federal contract funding of criminal enforcement on a tribal reservation; frivolous allegations; application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. Plaintiff, Garrett Lee Jones, is “an enrolled Indian of the Red Lake Indian Reservation,” Compl. at 1, who is currently serving a 30-year sent

Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies; Issue Preclusion; 1868 Ute Treaty; “Bad Men” Provision. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT On April 1, 2013, plaintiffs filed their complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims.

Class action — RCFC 23; Premium pay; Sunday premium pay under 5 U.S.C. §§ 5544(a) and 5546(a); Fathauer; Part-time employees; Numerosity; Commonality; Typicality; Adequacy; Superiority; Motion for class action under RCFC 23 allowed, in part. OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: Plaintiffs are current or former part-time emp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KELLY DUDA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24 - 1048 (LLA) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Kelly Duda brings this action against the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal

327 F.Supp.2d 26 (2004) Dr. Wen Ho LEE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.99-3380 TPJ. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 18, 2004. *27 Allyson Newton Ho, Jones Day, Washington, DC, Brian A. Sun, Jones Day, Heather Hersh Gilhooly, Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine &a;