Cases

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00133-CV MATINEE MEDIA CORP., Magnolia Radio Corp., Rick Deitrick, and Greg Shapiro, Appellants v. Eugenio FALCON, Antonio Falcon, Eloy Vera, Juan D. Posada, Jose Vasques, Karina Mascorro, and William Smith, Appellees

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Avila Perez and his wife Rosa Maria Avila, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying cancellation of removal and dismissing their motion to terminate removal proceedings and initiate deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We revi

717 F.Supp.2d 187 (2010) Roxana SANCHEZ-PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jose SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1035 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 15, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration July 2, 2010. *188 Edgardo L. Rivera-Rivera, Jose L. Lugo-Mercado, Rivera & Fer

MEMORANDUM *** Jose Francisco Regalado-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for suspension of deportation. We apply the transitional rules under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105

178 P.3d 1141 (2008) Dora NOFFKE, Appellant, v. Jose PEREZ and Neyda Perez, Appellees. No. S-12185. Supreme Court of Alaska. March 21, 2008. *1143 Paul W. Waggoner, Law Offices of Paul Waggoner, Anchorage, for Appellant. Michaela Kelley Canterbury, Kelley & Canterbury, LLC, Anchorage, for Appellees. Before: FABE

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY ADJUDICATION DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary adjudication. Plaintiffs are immigrant youth that bring this action to ch

Case: 11-40632 Document: 00511933253 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 25, 2012 No. 1

REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July

*334 MEMORANDUM WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge. Plaintiffs Jose Rosiles-Perez, Jesus Santiago-Salmoran and Hector Ortiz-Mora individually1, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed this action under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.

OPINION T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge. Rosalba Ramirez-Perez appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her request for cancellation of removal. She asserts two due process challenges. First, she argues that the BIA’s interpretation of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” violates her due process rights. Second, she

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Daniel Fernandez and Jose Betancourt appeal from convictions for conspiring to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), 846. Fernandez, who stands convicted after a jury trial, argues on appeal that (1) the district court erred in denying him a mistrial, (2) the district court’s multiple conspiracy jury charge was erroneous, (3) there was a prejudicia

MEMORANDUM** Jose Mendez Ramirez and Maria Angelica Perez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision (“U”) denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violation

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Francisco Ciprés, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or*579der summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional vi

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Francisco Ciprés, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or*579der summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional vi

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court Motion by Plaintiff, Ken Terrell (“Terrell”), for Class Certification (“Motion”) [D.E. 443],1 filed on October 9, 2009. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ written submissions, oral arguments presented on November 9,2009, and applicable law. I. BACKGROUND

*556MEMORANDUM ** Martimiano Felix, his wife, Nidia I. Perez-Valenzuela, and their two children, Jose L. Perez-Valenzuela and Rosa Y. Valenzuela (“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s order denying their motion to terminate remov

*874MEMORANDUM*** Jose De Jesus Llamas-Nunes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. The immigration judge determined that petitioner failed to establish the requisite exceptional and

ACCEPTED 13-14-00644-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/9/2015 11:34:39 PM