Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “JP RMP”
RMP Capital Corp. v. BAM Brokerage, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On January 27, 2014, the Plaintiff RMP Capital Corp. (“RMP Capital”), commenced this breach of contract action against the Defendants BAM Brokerage, Inc., d/b/a On the Edge Marketing (“BAM”); Creative Outdoor Distributors, Inc. (“Creative I”); Creative Outdoor Distributors USA, Inc. (“Creative II,” and together with Creative I, the “Creative Defendants”
United States v. Jose Valencia-Mendozapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30158 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00113-RMP-1 JOSE MANUEL VALENCIA- MENDOZA, aka Jose OPINION Valencia-Vargas, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washin
ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment (## 18, 19). The court heard oral arguments on the motions on September 9, 2015. Having considered the motions and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. I. Factual Background The material facts in this case are not in dis
Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES C. TURK, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Nautilus, Inc. (“Nautilus” or “Defendant”)’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 70). Plaintiffs Ponani Sukumar (“Sukumar”) and Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates, Inc. (“SCSRA”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed an Opposition (ECF No. 77), to which Nautilus has re
Zorbas v. United States Trust Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Theodoras Zorbas filed the above-captioned action against Defendants United States Trust Company, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., in New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, alleging negligence, negligent misrepresentation, negligent supervision, breach of fiduciary-duty, breach of express and implied contract, and breach of covenant
in Re Clinton Donald Johnspublic domain
FILED IN 1ST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS AUG 0 3 2015 _\r\"TW CHRISTOPHER Cfru.*\ e^ Kpoea\s CLERK •ft* \w<U- T\os\ D'\^\rvc,V c& "Texas Cause. Wo. J n re (UvnW
813 F.Supp.2d 489 (2011) PURE POWER BOOT CAMP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. WARRIOR FITNESS BOOT CAMP, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4810 (THK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 2011. *500 Matthew Henry Sheppe, Sherri Lee Eisenpress, Reiss, Eisenpresss and Sheppe LLP, Pasquale A. Razzano, Fitzpatr
O'grady, Shane Timothypublic domain
,~uise Pearson Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals § Ex.Parte Shane T. O'Grady P.O. Box 12.:308 § RE: Cause No. 58863 capitol Station § 412th Judicial Court Austin, Texas 78711 § § Dear Clerk, at this time I find it necessary to request your assistance to the following. ·Now comes Shane T. O'Grady in Cause No. 58863
Perry, Michael Deanpublic domain
I I EX PARTE APPLICATIOl':\1 FOR WRIT OF I -~ -L MANDAMUS FROM GREGG I MICHAEL DEAN PERRY COUNTY, 188th District Court .I I TRIAL COURT WRIT NO. 42,139-A CLERK'S SUMMARY SHEET I