Cases

ORDER RICHARD F, BOULWARE, II, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a quiet title and wrongful foreclosure action brought by Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”). Chase, which was the beneficiary of a deed of trust encumbering certain real property in Las Vegas, Nevada, brought suit seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against a homeowners ass

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on review of defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 55) filed on October 17, 2014. Plaintiffs filed a Memorandum of Law in Opposition (Doc. # 57) on November 26, 2014. Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. # 61) on Deeem-ber 22, 2014, and plaintiffs filed a Surreply (Doc. # 64) on Ja

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiffs, seventy-four individual investors, commenced this action on October 27, *2022011, in the Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, against JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., M & T Bank Corporation, HSBC North America, Inc., d/b/a HSBC Bank USA, N.A., and TD

*225MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE’S MOTION TO DISMISS STEARNS, District Judge. In March of 2009, the United States Department of the Treasury announced the details of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), a component of the optimistically styled “Making Home Affordable Program.” Under the provisions of HAMP, mortgage loan

806 F.Supp.2d 662 (2011) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the AFTRA RETIREMENT FUND, in its capacity as a fiduciary of the AFTRA Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant. Board of Trustees of the Imperial County Employees' Retirement System, in its capacity as a fiduciary of the Imperial County Employees' Retirement System, individually and on behalf of all others sim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRACY RANDLE et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-1525 (TJK) SUNTRUST BANK, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Four named plaintiffs sue on behalf of a class of African American financial advisors em- ployed by Defendants, which the Court r

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 95 Docket: Aro-19-435 Submitted On Briefs: May 12, 2020 Decided: July 2, 2020 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, and HORTON JJ. WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR MFRA TRUST 2014-2 v. LISA BERRY HUMPHREY, J.

DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT E. GERBER, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................602 Facts............................ 606 A. Synthetic Lease Origination...........................................606 B. Term Loan Origination .........

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mark Lester instituted this action against defendants J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Washington Mutual Bank (‘WaMu”) to, among other things, stop Chase from foreclosing on his home. See generally Co

20-3909-cv Fed. Republic of Nigeria v. VR Advisory Servs., Ltd. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2021 Argued: December 7, 2021 Decided: February 3, 2022 Docket No. 20-3909-cv THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA, ABUBAKAR MALAMI, The Attorney General of the Federal Re

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge. This case involves claims arising out of Verizon’s spin-off of its domestic directories business into a separate company, then known as Ideare. The plaintiff is U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), acting as litigation trustee of the Ideare Inc. et al. Litigation Trust. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint and Jury Deman

20-3909-cv Fed. Republic of Nigeria v. VR Advisory Servs., Ltd. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2021 Argued: December 7, 2021 Decided: February 3, 2022 Amended: February 24, 2022 Docket No. 20-3909-cv THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA, ABUBAKAR MALAMI,

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, United States District Judge Stripped of its technical jargon, this case is about whether a nearly decade-old defaulted mortgage loan remains enforceable. Plaintiffs Vito and Marion Costa argue that the applicable six-year statute of limitations has expired and that they are therefore entitled to the cancellation and discharge of their mortgage loan. Defendants, the loa

DECISION AND ORDER McMAHON, District Judge. The court, for its rulings in limine on the motions filed by U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) arid PHL Variable Life Insurance Company (“Phoenix”) (see Docket ## 179, 182 in No. 13 Civ. 1580 and Docket ## 386, 389 in No. 12 Civ. 6811), and on an untimely motion for judgment by the pleadings filed by Phoenix, (see Docket # 398

254 F.Supp.2d 448 (2003) VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff, v. GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPNY and XL Reinsurance America, Inc., Defendants. No. 02 CV 5069(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 1, 2003. *450 David M. Schlecker, Anderson, Kill, Olick P.C., New York City, for Valley Nat. Bank. Mark L. LoSacco, LeB

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

*598Opinion and Order Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss counts I-VI and VIII of the plaintiffs’ consolidated amended class action complaint (“CAC”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (ECF No. 53.) For the reasons set forth in this order

OPINION AND ORDER ON CREDIT SUISSE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE NOTEHOLDER ACTIONS JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse, New York Branch (together, “Credit Suisse”), for summary judgment on the claims brought by the Noteholder plaintiffs. The Noteholders are institutional investors who collect

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”) appeals from the July 14, 2014 judgment entered by the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas finding in favor of Christine Pautenis 1 (“Home Owner”) in this mortgage, foreclosure action 2

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: Bank fees, like taxes, are ubiquitous. And, like taxes, bank fees are unlikely to go away any time soon. The question we *716 consider here is the extent to which overdraft fees imposed by a national bank are subject to state regulation.