⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JUDITH V BROWN”

Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE JUDITH BROWN, ET AL., ) No. ED110627 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) Jefferson County vs.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015-02-17 · Published · cited 7× · 859 N.W.2d 836; 2015 Minn. App. LEXIS 9; 2015 WL 648414
OPINION SCHELLHAS, Judge. Appellant challenges the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of her contribution claim against respondent. We reverse and remand. FACTS In 2005, Gordon Brown personally guaranteed the debt of Weeres Industries Corp. (WIC) to Peoples National Bank of Mora, including future
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1031 Judy Brown, Appellant, vs. Judith M. Lee, Respondent. Filed February 17, 2015
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 160× · 906 F.3d 944
ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge: *947 Much has been said about the art of diagnosis. For example, Mahatma Gandhi 2 opined, "A correct diagnosis is three-fourths the remedy." Prashant Gupta, Wisdom of Gandhi 53 (2008).
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 11, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00122-CV BLAS HERRERA AND SUSANNE HERRERA AND DOUGLAS BANKSTON AND JUDITH BANKSTON, JASON BROWN AND SHERYL BROWN, AND ELLEN GARDNER, Appellants V. THE CITY OF ROWLETT, TEXAS, Appell
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
JUDITH GRAJALES PEREZ * NO. 2021-CA-0279 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JEANE FAMILY * PROPERTIES, LLC AND FOURTH CIRCUIT TENTEN REMODELING, INC. * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS’
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013-11-20 · Published · cited 6× · 998 N.E.2d 297; 2013 WL 6091705; 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 578
OPINION BROWN, Judge. Clifford and Judith Ann Garrett (collectively, the "Garretts") appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Paul and Linda Spear (collectively, the "Spears"). The Garretts raise two issues which we consolidate and restate as whether the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Spears and denying t
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1997-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 26 Va. App. 36; 492 S.E.2d 843; 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 681
BAKER, Judge. Judith Brown Macica (claimant) appeals from a decision of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission (commission) that denied her request for Dr. Arthur R. Sonberg to be designated as her treating physician for her on-the-job inju *39 ríes
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2012-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 367 S.W.3d 301; 2012 WL 569679; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 1355
OPINION MACKEY K. HANCOCK, Justice. Judith M. Henderson appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding Timothy Wayne Spann and Amanda Spann damages in connection with a motor vehicle accident. Among her other contentions, Henderson argues that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of unadjusted medical bills. In light of recent controlling authority, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 270 So. 3d 69
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-00028-COA JUSTIN BRYCE BROWN APPELLANT v. KRISTIN FRANKLIN ANSLUM APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/20/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAVID SHOEMAKE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SIMPSON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPEL
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018-07-11 · Published · cited 6× · 320 F. Supp. 3d 363
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This case is one of many, look-alike lawsuits filed nationwide by current and former members of faculty and staff of private (mainly elite) universities in which it is alleged that the universities imprudently managed retirement accounts to the detriment of their employee-plan participants. Plaintiffs Diane G. Short, Samira Pardanani, Judith Daviau, and Joseph Barboza (
Smith v. Brownpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012-08-15 · Published · cited 8× · 97 So. 3d 1186; 2011 La.App. 1 Cir. 1749; 2012 WL 3329678; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1058
GAIDRY, J. IsThis appeal is from a summary judgment invalidating an indemnity agreement in a contract as violative of La. R.S. 23:1033. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Formosa Plastics Corporation, Louisiana (“Formosa”), the operator of a chemical manufacturing plant in Baton Rouge, entered into a contract with Harmony, L.L.C. (“Harmony”) on December 1, 2001 for the provision o
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2025-03-24 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court No. 2023-310-Appeal. (WC 17-376) Judith Clinton : v. : Chad Babcock et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 250 Benefit Street, Provide
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 621; 202 L. Ed. 2d 430
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-05-30 · Published · cited 9× · 138 F.4th 552
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 18, 2025 Decided May 30, 2025 No. 24-5092 JUDITH JELTSJE PIETERSEN AND DANIEL GERHARD BROWN, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Nelson v. Brownpublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2009-11-25 · Published · cited 1× · 673 F. Supp. 2d 85; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110189; 2009 WL 4282051
673 F.Supp.2d 85 (2009) Hassan NELSON, Petitioner, v. William BROWN, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 06-CV-116 (JS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 25, 2009. *86 Andrea G. Hirsch, Esq., New York, NY, for Petitioner. Kathleen M. Rice, Esq., District Attorney, Nassau Co
Ohio Supreme Court · 2011-06-16 · Published · cited 3× · 2011 Ohio 2858; 129 Ohio St. 3d 17; 949 N.E.2d 999
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgments of the courts of appeals dismissing the complaints of appellant, Frank C. Brown, a child-support obligor, for writs of *18 mandamus to compel appellees, Hancock County Department of Job and Family Services Direct
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010-10-08 · Published · cited 27× · 621 F.3d 48; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20852; 2010 WL 3932079
621 F.3d 48 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Timothy BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-1803. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard July 26, 2010. Decided October 8, 2010. *50 Judith H. Mizner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, for appellant. Kelly Begg Lawrence, Assistant U.S.
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2013 UT App 264; 315 P.3d 1052; 750 Utah Adv. Rep. 59; 2013 WL 5946110; 2013 Utah App. LEXIS 267
Decision PER CURIAM: T1 A Healthy Choice (Healthy Choice) appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Michelle, Kelly, and Kelsey Brown and dismissing the action. We affirm. T2 Months after the close of discovery in this matter, the Browns moved to dismiss the case based on Healthy Choice's failure t
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014-05-14 · Published · cited 4× · 19 F. Supp. 3d 390; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66198
RULING ON LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. This action was brought in Connecticut Superior Court by Walter Brown against fourteen defendants, including Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”), for injuries related to exposure to asbestos. Lockheed removed the case to this court