Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1514 CRAIG CANTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 3 and AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United State

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEOFFREY MOYLE, an individual, Nos. 13-56330 on behalf of themselves; PAULINE 13-56412 ARWOOD, an individual, on behalf of themselves; THOMAS D.C. No. ROLLASON, an individual, on 3:10-cv-02179- behalf of themselves; JEANNIE GPC-MDD SANDERS, an individual, on behalf of themselves, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ ORDER AND

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL, United States District Judge On October 28, 2016, Defendants filed a supplemental brief in support of their mo*1004tion for summary judgment following remand. (Dkt. No. 296.) On November 10, 2016, Plaintiffs 'filed a supplemen

OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants are former employees of Old Golden Eagle Insurance Company (“Golden Eagle”). Golden Eagle did not offer a retirement plan to its employees. When Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) purchased Golden Eagle through a conservatorship sale, Appellants became employees of Liberty Mutual. Appellants stat

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00112-CV ___________________________ DAVID A. SKEELS, Appellant V. JONATHAN T. SUDER; MICHAEL T. COOKE; AND FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE, P.C., Appellees

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, their oppositions and their replies. On June 7, 2013, the Court held a hearing. (Dkt. No. 247.) Matthew Butler, Esq. and Andrew Myers, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs and Ashley A

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. This class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., was filed on behalf of former or current employees of defendant Meriter Health Services, Inc., who were participating in defendant Meriter Health Services Employee Retirement Plan, as well as other beneficiaries of the Plan. Plaintif

RENDERED: AUGUST 22, 2024 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2022-SC-0496-RR JAMES T. JAMESON APPELLANT V. IN SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSION APPELLEE OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE L

Opinion by Judge ROY. T & T, LLC (T & T) appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Rick Weston (creditor). Specifically, T & T contends that the trial court erred when it (1) permitted a non-attorney to represent T & T during the proceedings; (2) allowed creditor to intervene in the action despite his failure to file a motion pursuant to C.R.C.P. 24(c); (8) permitted creditor to assert a

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CP-01167-COA LAKEISHA C. GREEN APPELLANT v. TORRANCE T. GREEN APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/14/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DENISE OWENS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CORNELIUS T. WALKER, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0816-MTZ ) FRP INVESTORS GP, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CP-01152-SCT CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2017-CP-00828-SCT MICHAEL T. GERTY v. JOESIE R. GERTY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JENNIFER T. SCHLOEGEL TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: THOMAS WRIGHT TEEL JIM HOO

[Cite as Jackson v. Jackson, 2024-Ohio-1755.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Marjorie Jackson, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-325 (C.P.C. No. 22DR-1401) v. : (

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ... 901 II. BACKGROUND ... 902 A. Legal Background ... 902 B. Factual History ... 902 C. Procedural History ... 904 III. DISCUSSION PART ONE: STANDING ... 905 A. Standard of Re

[Cite as Jackson v. Jackson, 2024-Ohio-3134.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: JOHN M. JACKSON : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. Plaintiff-Appellant :

(2008) Kenneth Walton GEORGE, Dennis Reed Bowen, Clyde Freeman, George Moyers, Jim Matthews, and Henry Miller, on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DUKE ENERGY RETIREMENT CASH BALANCE PLAN and Duke Energy Corporation, Defendants. C/A No. 8:06-cv-373-RBH. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division. <

RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In September 2013, the Gertys filed a joint complaint for an irreconcilable-differences divorce. The joint complaint languished in the Harrison County Chancery Court for almost two years, during which the parties cooperated with each other and faithfully abided by the Property Settlement Agreement ("PSA"), which had been filed contemporan

FOR PUBLICATION Jan 27 2014, 7:04 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: DANIEL J. MOORE PAMELA J. HERMES Laszynski & Moore Gambs, Mucker, & Bauman Lafayette, Indiana Lafayette, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA IN RE THE PATERNITY OF C.J.A.: G. C. (Mother),

253 F.Supp.2d 438 (2003) Harvey STRAUS, Stanley Brodka, Charles J. Santilli, Leonard Goldberg, Robert W. Clark, Dennis Velasco, Dave Kievit, Anthony Naroiso, Gerald J. Rascoli, and Seymour Goldstein, Plaintiffs, v. PRUDENTIAL EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN, Prudential Employee Savings Plan Administrative Committee, and Prudential Insurance Company of America, Defendants. No. CV 02 3067(RJD). United States Distr

ACCEPTED 01-15-00396-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/8/2015 7:07:05 AM