Cases

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

[Cite as Jackson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Jobs & Family Servs., 2024-Ohio-2998.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO WHITNIE JACKSON Case No. 2024-00439PQ Requester Special Master Todd Marti v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CUYAHOGA COUNTY JFS/ OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JFS Respondent {¶1} This matter is before the special ma

Per Curiam. {1Í1} Respondent, Gerald M. Jackson of Shaker Heights, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0010039, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1972. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we publicly reprimand respondent, based on findings that he (1) failed to account to a client for his time, fees, and expenses as required by DR 9-102(B)(3) and (2) faded to apprise a client that

Cuyahoga App. No. 81589, 2002-Ohio-5980. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from *1434the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due January 23, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon

[Cite as Jackson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Job & Family Services, 2024-Ohio-4785.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO WHITNIE JACKSON Case No. 2024-00439PQ Requester Judge Lisa L. Sadler v. DECISION AND ENTRY CUYAHOGA COUNTY JFS/OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JFS Respondent {¶1} In this public-records case, Requester Whitnie J

Per Curiam. We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year with the entire one-year suspension stayed. During this stay, respondent shall be on probation under terms which include an evaluation by a mental health professional approved by the relator whose report will be available to the relator. Respondent will accept an

Per Curiam. We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Given respondent’s restitution, remorse, and ultimate cooperation in the proceedings, a definite suspension from the practice of law is an appropriate sanction for his misconduct. See Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 185, 580 N.E.2d 1076. Respondent is hereby suspended from the

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, P.J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Andre Jackson, appeals the denial of his motion for a new mitigation trial. He claims the following two errors: 1. The trial court erred when it denied Jackson's motion for leave to file his motion for a new mitigation trial. 2. Ohio's capital punishment scheme, R.C. 2929.03 and R.C. 2929.05, and the procedures set for

TIM McCORMACK, J.: {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio ("the state") appeals from the trial court's dismissal with prejudice of its case against defendant-appellee Rufus Jackson ("Jackson"). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Procedural and Substantive History {¶ 2} This case arises out of an incident that occurred on March 3, 2006. On that

MARY J. BOYLE, J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, William M. Jackson, III ("Jackson"), appeals his felonious assault and weapons disability convictions. He raises two assignments of error for our review: 1. The state failed to present sufficient evidence of the offenses charged. 2. Appellant's convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence.

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michael Jackson ("Jackson"), appeals from the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to suppress evidence. He raises the following assignment of error for review: The trial court erred in denying defendant-appellant's motion to suppress, and the trial court's decision must be reversed. {¶ 2} Afte

Per Curiam. We agree with the board’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

DeGenaro, J., dissenting. *552{¶ 32} I agree with the majority that a state-employed social worker's statutory duty to share with law enforcement information concerning a child-abuse investigation does not render the social worker an agent of law enforcement in all cases-I would stop short of creating a bright-line rule. Altho

Appellant appeals from a judgment of the common pleas court which affirmed the determination of the State Personnel Board of Review that she was properly removed from her classified civil service position. On January 19, 1984, appellant Laverne E. Csanyi was removed by the Cuyahoga County Commissioners from her position as senior bookkeeper with the Western Reserve Area Agency on Aging. This January 19 order of removal was effective January 27. Appellant was accorded no pretermi

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION On November 6, 2000, the relators1 commenced this mandamus action against the respondent, the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, to compel the court to cease execution of an order and to restore the Health Care Companies and the individual relators to their pre-execution status. The respondent filed a brief in opposition, which this court recognized as a motion to dismiss. Subsequent

O’Neill, J., dissenting. {¶ 311} Once again, I am compelled to dissent from this court’s affirmance of a death sentence. Here, the court places its imprimatur on the execution of an intellectually disabled man, despite the fact that the only evidence presented strongly tends to establish that the victim’s injury and death were unintended. {¶ 312} I do not expect that the court will adopt my

[Cite as Carroll v. Cuyahoga Community College, 2023-Ohio-3628.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ROY M. CARROLL : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112257 v. : CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, E