Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Crim. Dist. Ct. La., Orleans Parish. Certiorari denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *396granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas granted. The case is to be argued in tandem with No. 10-9646, Miller v. Alabama, immediately supra. Same case below, 2011 Ark. 49, 378 S.W.3d 103.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-­tiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. *933Same case below, 573 F.3d 856.

JIM GUNTER, Justice. | jAppellants/cross-appellees, the Arkansas Department of Correction and its director, Ray Hobbs, and appellees/cross-appellants, a group of several prisoners awaiting execution on Arkansas’s death row, appeal an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court granting in part and denying in part cross-motions for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction over this appeal as it involves is

The opinion of Judge Lewis follows: This action was instituted by the plaintiff Etheline Jackson against the defendants L. M. Hobbs, G. M. Harrison and Western Fire Insurance Company to recover damages allegedly sustained by her on account of the acts of the defendants in connection with fire insurance policies issued by the defendant Western Fire Insurance Company covering a dwelling and store building of the plaintiff. It is alleged t

745 F.Supp.2d 886 (2010) Jack Harold JONES, Plaintiff v. Ray HOBBS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, Defendant Don W. Davis; Alvin Bernal Jackson; Kenneth Dewayne Williams; Stacey Eugene Johnson; Jason Farrell McGehee; and Bruce Ward, Intervenors. Case No. 5:10CV00065 JLH. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division.<

658 F.3d 842 (2011) Marcel Wayne WILLIAMS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Ray HOBBS, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, in his official capacity, Respondent/Appellee. Jack Harold Jones, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, Don William Davis; Alvin Bernal Jackson; Stacey Eugene Johnson; Kenneth Dewayne Williams; Jason Farrell McGehee; Bruce Earl Ward, Intervenor Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Ray Hobbs, in his official capacity as Acti

604 F.3d 580 (2010) Jack Harold JONES, Jr., Plaintiff, Don William Davis, Intervenor plaintiff-Appellee Alvin Bernal Jackson, Intervenor plaintiff Stacey Eugene Johnson, Intervenor plaintiff-Appellee Kenneth Dewayne Williams; Jason Farrell McGehee; Bruce Earl Ward, Intervenor plaintiffs v. Ray HOBBS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellant. No. 10-1754.<

660 S.E.2d 168 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Edward DeVille HOBBS. No. COA07-914. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 6, 2008. Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III, by Assistant Attorney General LaToya B. Powell, for the State. Appellate Defender Staples Hughes, by Assistant Appellant Defender Anne M. Gomez, for defendant-appellant. JACKSON, Jud

Benham, Justice. **266Torico Jackson appeals his convictions for malice murder and related offenses in connection with the stabbing death of John Ray. On appeal, Jackson claims that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the applicable statute of limitation for the relevant non-murder offenses, by admitting certain police repo

501 F.3d 395 (2007) Margaret HOBBS; John Hobbs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALCOA, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-51068. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 18, 2007. *396 Jennifer Scott Riggs (argued), Riggs & Aleshire, Austin, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Michael Randolph Shelbelskie, Sean Patr

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Reid, No.

803 F.Supp.2d 1285 (2011) Sarah WALKER, Plaintiff, v. THI OF NEW MEXICO AT HOBBS CENTER d/b/a Hobbs Health Care Center, Diana Melton, Jaime Andujo, Debbie Lothridge, Karen Hood, THI of New Mexico, LLC, Fundamental Clinical Consulting, LLC, and Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC, Defendants. No. CIV 09-0060 JB/RLP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. April 7, 2011

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Third Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, filed March 4, 2011 (Doc. 220). The Court held a hearing on April 29, 2011. The primary issues are: (i) *334whether the Court should order the Defendants to amend their answers t

801 F.Supp.2d 1128 (2011) Sarah WALKER, Plaintiff, v. THI OF NEW MEXICO AT HOBBS CENTER d/b/a Hobbs Health Care Center, Diana Melton, Jaime Andujo, Debbie Lothridge, Karen Hood (Miller), Thi of New Mexico, LLC, Fundamental Clinical Consulting, LLC, Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC, Thi of Baltimore, Inc., and Fundamental Long-Term Care Holdings, LLC, Defendants, and Thi of New Mexico at Hobbs Center, LLC, Thi of New Mexico, LLC, Funda

803 F.Supp.2d 1287 (2011) Sarah WALKER, Plaintiff, v. THI OF NEW MEXICO AT HOBBS CENTER d/b/a Hobbs Health Care Center, Diana Melton, Jaime Andujo, Debbie Lothridge, Karen Hood (Miller), THI of New Mexico, LLC, Fundamental Clinical Consulting, LLC, Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC, THI of Baltimore, Inc., and Fundamental Long-Term Care Holdings, LLC, Defendants, and THI of New Mexico at Hobbs Center, LLC, THI of New Mexico, LLC, Funda