⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jackson v. Taylor”

Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 2813; 207 L. Ed. 2d 147
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 568 U.S. 894; 133 S. Ct. 291
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004-02-20 · Published · cited 1× · 153 S.W.3d 842; 2004 Ky. App. LEXIS 36; 2004 WL 315153
153 S.W.3d 842 (2004) Charles Demetric JACKSON, Appellant, v. Vertner L. TAYLOR, Appellee. No. 2003-CA-000339-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 20, 2004. Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court February 9, 2005. *843 Charles Jackson, West Liberty, pro se. Brenn O. Combs, Frankfort, KY, for ap
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 79; 202 L. Ed. 2d 53
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-01-06 · Published · cited 23× · 984 F.3d 1107
Case: 17-60856 Document: 00515696581 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2021 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-60856
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-05-31 · Published · cited 21× · 95 A.D.3d 1604; 945 N.Y.S.2d 465
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), entered June 28, 2011, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the amended petition. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of three children (born in 2002, 2004 and 2005). In September 2005, and upon the father’s
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 95 A.D.3d 1604; 945 N.Y.S.2d 465
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), entered June 28, 2011, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the amended petition. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of three children (born in 2002, 2004 and 2005). In September 2005, and upon the father’s
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983-06-30 · Published · cited 1× · 713 F.2d 865; 230 U.S. App. D.C. 71
713 F.2d 865 230 U.S.App.D.C. 71 Jacksonv.Taylor 82-2339 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 6/30/83 D.C.D.C., 539 F.Supp. 593 AFFIRMED
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2019-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00146-CV ____________________ TAYLOR LASTOR, Appellant V. JOHN LIONEL JACKSON, Appellee ___________________________________________________________
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 1982-05-24 · Published · cited 3× · 539 F. Supp. 593; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12722
539 F.Supp. 593 (1982) Ainsworth C. JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Patricia TAYLOR, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-0905. United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 24, 1982. *594 Ainsworth C. Jackson et al., pro se. Robert J. Harlan, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsel, District of Columbia, Washington, D. C., for d
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 21, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143495
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1969-04-16 · Published · cited 13× · 272 Cal. App. 2d 1; 76 Cal. Rptr. 891; 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 2236
Action to recover on a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust. [1a] The question before this court is whether the second deed of trust executed by defendants in favor of plaintiffs and securing a promissory note is one for purchase money within the meaning of section 580b of the Code of Civil Procedure which would exempt defendants from any personal obligation to plaintiffs. We have decided that it was a purchase money deed of trust given to secure t
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2005-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00257-CR ___________________
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1153; 119 S. Ct. 1056
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1153
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2026-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered May 27, 2026. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,706-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3151 ISAIAH TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTIN SCHWARZHUBER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-03-17 · Published · cited 18× · 132 F.4th 480
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3151 ISAIAH TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTIN SCHWARZHUBER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Taylor v. Berryhillpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JEREMIAH TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-0316 (KBJ)
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, July 17, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0275. JACKSON TAYLOR STOUT v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: ST18CR0247 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's