⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jacob Matthew James”

In re Jacob W.public domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-02-15 · Published · cited 26× · 200 A.3d 1091; 330 Conn. 744
KAHN, J. This certified appeal requires us to clarify the circumstances under which a petitioner is precluded from relying on an alleged lack of an ongoing parent-child relationship as a basis for terminating a noncustodial parent's rights. 1 The respondent father, Daniel W., appeals from the judgment of the A
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 48× · 417 App. D.C. 311; 795 F.3d 48; 417 U.S. App. D.C. 311; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12785; 2015 WL 4489885
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: In response to the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, Congress passed and. President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. See Pub.L. No. ill-208, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). State National Bank is a bank in Big Spring,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-07-11 · Published · cited 11× · 733 F.3d 72; 2013 WL 3470532; 112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5089; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14052
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ, Judge DAVIS, and Judge WYNN wrote the opinion. MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges: Liberty University and certain individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action challenging two provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: the “individual mandate,” which requires individuals to purc
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-12-03 · Published · cited 13× · 773 F.3d 849; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22743; 114 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6827; 2014 WL 6790233
ROVNER, Circuit Judge. After a three-day trial, jurors found James Stuart guilty of three counts of tax evasion for failing to pay almost $289,400 in income tax between 2005 and 2007. See 26 U.S.C. § 7201. Stuart moved for a new trial and judgment of acquittal because, he argued, his trial counsel inadequately defended him. The district court denied the motio
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-05-29 · Published · cited 10× · 102 N.E.3d 336
Barteau, Senior Judge *337 Statement of the Case [1] Appellant Jeffery Certa appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Steak 'n Shake. 1 We reverse and remand. Issue
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 712 So. 2d 266; 98 La.App. 5 Cir. 405; 1998 La. App. LEXIS 1162; 1998 WL 237311
laCANNELLA, Judge. Relator, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm), seeks writs from the trial court ruling denying its motion for summary judgment on the issue of insurance coverage. For the reasons which follow, we grant the writ and reverse the trial court ruling. State Farm provided homeowner’s insurance to defendant, Richard Klibert. On the day of the accident giving rise to this lawsuit,
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-10-01 · Published · cited 3× · 453 S.W.3d 255; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1103; 2014 WL 4922931
. WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., C.J./P.J. Plaintiff Jerry Jacob McClain, by and through his mother and next friend, Lori Rutledge (collectively “Plaintiffs”), Dr. Allen Northern, and Rolla Medical Group and Women’s Clinic, Inc. (collectively “Northern”), appeal from a judgment in favor of Defendants James Flanary, James Cesar, Alan Doerhoff, Carter Fenton, Ade-luolag Lipede, Benny Thomas, John Linde, and John Schwent (collectivel
Alaska Supreme Court · 2008-03-07 · Published · cited 64× · 177 P.3d 1181; 2008 Alas. LEXIS 34; 2008 WL 613122
MATTHEWS, Justice, dissenting. I agree with the court that the Office of Children’s Services violated the Jacobs’ rights by failing to provide them notice of their grandchildren’s CINA proceedings and permanency hearings. I also agree with the court’s assessment that this case presents a disturbing set of facts. However, for most of the reasons the court provides in its discussion of injunctive relief,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999-07-27 · Published · cited 5× · 186 F.3d 183; 1999 WL 543204
PER CURIAM: Gittel Gordon entered into two contracts with publisher Matthew Bender & Co., Inc., under which she agreed to write and update two immigration law treatises. The first contract, dated August 15, 1980, required Gordon to edit and update a one-volume desk edition of an immigration law treatise (the “Desk Edition”). The second contract, dated May 19, 1983, required Gordon to write and update a two-volume treatise
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0236p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MATTHEW HOWELL; ALISHA BROWN, │ Plaintiffs-
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-03-19 · Published · cited 24× · 675 F.3d 503
PRADO, Circuit Judge: This consolidated appeal arises out of an alleged multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by R. Allen Stanford through his various corporate entities. These three cases deal with the scope of the preclusion provision of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLUSA”). That provision states: “No covered class action based upon the statutory o
In re Jacob W.public domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Michigan Supreme Court · 2024-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2023-10-19 · Published · cited 0×
FILED October 19, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MATTHEW FISHER, Derivatively on ) Behalf of LENDINGCLUB ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0631-AGB ) SCOTT SANBORN, THOMAS W. ) CASEY, BRADLEY COLEMAN, ) SAMEER GULATI, JOHN C. ) MORRIS, DANIEL T. CIPORIN,
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
/Dear Clerk Acosta, | 5 ,Q § win vv»>' .W»l»fQ/AMM*’ °~f/""°°'+'b" n ‘07 1 just got my response /denial back from Ft.Worth DA office. They said" Applicant's claims are best suited for a Motion for Reconsideration, and not as an application alleging his first application was not properly considered." Qbw#Qd.Om F&yLSTX 0?-+hCH~oL&J@i/rQfP0WW~ So here 1 am filing the Motion to reconsider, they said to file. 1 am filing it with ya'll coz they lie, they are opposition and will not give me relie
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
07/24/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 10, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MATTHEW P. LADEWIG Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 17-55 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2017-02100-CCA-R3-CD The
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-11-07 · Published · cited 4× · 258 So. 3d 478
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MATTHEW WARE, JESSICA BELL, TEREZA LANDRUM, CAROLINE WELLS, CALLI PASTOR, JAMES JACOBS and JESSE CAMBPELL, Appellants, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee. No. 4D18-1372 [November 7, 2018] Appeal of a non-final order from
State v. Ayrespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 412 P.3d 281; 290 Or. App. 466
PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Zuniga , 288 Or. App. 742, 407 P.3d 961 (2017).
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
05/11/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACOB PEARMAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-71592 David M. Bragg, Judge __________________