Cases

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-19-00441-CV _________________ MARY LATONA WARD, INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ERIC L. WARD, Appellant V. JACOB SPONSELLER, Appellee _____

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice Appellant Bruce Earl Ward appeals an order of the Jefferson County Circuit Court denying a motion for preliminary injunction and dismissing his complaint against Governor Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelley, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC); Randy Watson, Warden of Varner Supermax Unit; and Benny Magness, Chairperson of the Arkansas Board of Corrections (collectively "the State"). For rev

Powell, J.: Christopher R. Ward appeals his convictions of theft by deception and making false information by making four arguments on appeal: (1) The State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his crimes of conviction; (2) his constitutional right to a jury trial was infringed when the judge orally instructed the jury that it “must” find the defendant guilty if it had n

LEE, P.J., for the Court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 1. On January 13, 2000, David Ward pled guilty in Rankin County Circuit Court to possession of more than two grams, but less than ten grams of cocaine; possession of more than thirty grams, but less than 250 grams of marijuana; and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was sentenced to serve twenty-two years in the custod

Mark A. Ward ("plaintiff) appeals from an order granting Jett Properties, LLC's ("defendant") motion for sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. After careful review, we affirm. Plaintiff is a tenant residing in unit 21 of Buckeye Townhouses in Rural Hall, North Carolina. Defendant owns Buckeye Townhouses. In a separate action, initiated on 20 June 2007, plaintiff filed a complaint seeking injunctive relief for the alleged violation of rest

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ, Judge DAVIS, and Judge WYNN wrote the opinion. MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges: Liberty University and certain individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action challenging two provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: the “individual mandate,” which requires individuals to purc

*18 SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this case be REMANDED for the limited purpose of amending the written judgment to conform to the district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence, and that the judgment be AFFIRMED in all other respects. Ronnie Ward appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on J

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons s

DAVID P. WARD Appellant-Below Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS a State Agency, and THE MERIT EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD, Appellees-Below Appellees. No. 126, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: June 24, 2009. Decided: July 27, 2009. Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER HENRY duPONT RIDGELY, Justice This 27t

212 F.Supp.2d 1349 (2002) Bertha WARD, Plaintiff, v. State of FLORIDA, Department of Juvenile Justice, Defendants. No. 4:01CV478-WCS. United States District Court, N.D. Florida. Tallahassee Division. July 12, 2002. *1350 *1351 *1352 Gary Lee Printy, Gary L

Holder v Jacob (2024 NY Slip Op 03864) Holder v Jacob 2024 NY Slip Op 03864 Decided on July 18, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Higgitt, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

Holder v Jacob (2024 NY Slip Op 03864) Holder v Jacob 2024 NY Slip Op 03864 Decided on July 18, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department HIGGITT, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

Judge STRAUB dissents in a separate opinion. JACOBS, Circuit Judge: In 1995, Connecticut General Statute § 17b-104 was amended to reduce benefits payable under the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program for those beneficiaries who also received housing subsidies. See 1995 Conn. Acts 95-351, § 2(d) (Reg.Sess.) (codified at Conn. Gen.Stat. § 17b-104 (1996)). The amendment w

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: This case began as a relatively straightforward class action suit for breach of contract. Martha Ward and other policyholders in the state of South Carolina (collectively, “pla

BYE, Circuit Judge. Heather Wilkinson appeals the denial of her motion to remand her action to Missouri state court, which the district court denied on the ground she fraudulently joined a fellow Missouri resident, Jacob Allen Shackelford, in her tire tread failure suit against Michelin North America, Inc. (Michelin) in order to defeat federal diversity jurisdiction. After concl

194 F.Supp.2d 1250 (2002) Bertha WARD, Plaintiff, v. State of FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Defendants. No. 4:01CV478-WCS. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. April 9, 2002. *1251 *1252 Gary Lee Printy, Gary L. Printy, PA, Tallahassee, Fl, Marie A. Matt

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 21, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-2314 Lower Tribunal Nos. 15-362, 14-6726 ________________ Michael J. Schlesinger, etc., et al.,

WILLIAMS, Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the trial court finding defendant New Orleans Public Service, Inc. [“NOPSI”] liable to plaintiffs for damages received as a result of a collision between the truck in which plaintiffs were riding and a NOPSI bus. The plaintiffs adduced the following facts at trial: In November, 1980, plaintiffs were travelling west down Leon C. Simo

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cour

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (St. George, J), rendered November 17, 2011, convicting him of vehicular assault in the second degree, operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs, reckless driving, speeding, not driving on the right side, and unsafe lane changing, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defe