Cases

Appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Joseph A. Egitto, J.), dated April 23, 2015, and (2) an order of protection of that court, also dated April 23, 2015. The order, after a hearing, found that the appellant committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree. The order of protection directed the appellant, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until and including Apri

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, *954 from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Markey, J.), dated July 31, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendant Jules J. Jacobs and, in effect, granted that branch of the separate mot

Opinion issued June 5, 2008 Opinion issued June 5, 2008

JEFFREY W. BATES, J. Kalen Hall (Defendant) was convicted after a jury trial of the class A felony of assault in the first degree. See § 565.050.2 Presenting one point on appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence because the State failed to prove that Defendant caused "serious physical injury" to J.L. (Vic

Affirmed.

ORDER Appellant waives this appeal. It is therefore DISMISSED. The parties shall bear their own costs.

ORDER Appellant waives this appeal. It is therefore DISMISSED. The parties shall bear their own costs.

* * * * * * * * * * * Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission affirms with minor modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. * * * * * * * * * * * Based upon all of the competent evide

HOLLAND, Justice. Charlene M. Hall (the “Mother”) filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of Christopher Moore (the “Father”) with regard to a child (the “Child”) born on August 24, 2005. The Family Court granted the Mother’s petition. This is the Father’s appeal from that final judgment. The Father has raised two issues. First, he argues that the Family Court violated his right to due process

14 A.3d 512 (2011) Carl HALL, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below-Appellee. No. 555, 2010. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: February 1, 2011. Decided: March 3, 2011. *514 Natalie S. Woloshin, Esquire, Woloshin, Lynch, Natalie & Gagne, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellant.

12 A.3d 1123 (2010) Brice M. HALL, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below-Appellee. No. 285, 2007. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 5, 2010. Decided: August 13, 2010. John R. Garey, Esquire (argued) of John R. Garey, PA, Dover, Delaware, for appellant. *1124 John Williams

SALIH HALL, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. PARVIZ SOROURI, M.D., Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 559, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: April 30, 2010. Decided: June 7, 2010. Revised: June 22, 2010. Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice. This 22nd day of June

577 F.3d 93 (2009) Linda JACOBS, Wendy Slaughter, and Kenneth Brown, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 07-4354-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: August 27, 2008. Decided: August 11, 2009.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Devere Andre Hall, Sr., appeals from various orders the District Court entered during the course of his lawsuit against Appellees. For the following reasons, we will affirm. In March 2005, Hall filed a pro se civil rights action against the City of Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Police Department, the Police Commissioner, and various police officers. The action stemmed

THOMAS ADAMS,[1] Petitioner Below-Appellant, v. SANDRA HALL, Respondent Below-Appellee. No. 116, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 17, 2009. Decided: May 27, 2009. ORDER JACK B. JACOBS, Justice. This 27th day of May 2009, it appears to the Court that, on May 5, 2009, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice to show cause why t

OPINION PER CURIAM. Devere Andre Hall, Sr., appeals from various orders the District Court entered during the course of his lawsuit against Appellees. For the following reasons, we will affirm. In March 2005, Hall filed a pro se civil rights action against the City of Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Police Department, the Police Commissioner, and various police officers. The action stemmed

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant” of “Teva”) Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. [66], seeking summary judgment in its favor on each of Plaintiff Keisha Hall’s (“Plaintiff’) claims. See Compl., ECF No. [1]. The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, all supporting and op

134 Ill. App.3d 516 (1985) 481 N.E.2d 5 HENRY THOMAS HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOBS, CAMODECA and TIMPONE et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-0609. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed June 24, 1985. *517 Gorman & Gorman, of Chicago (Gregory X. Gorman and H. Ca

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER EDWARD J. LODGE, District Judge. Before the Court in the above-entitled matter are the Third-Party Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Third-Party Complaint and Motion to the Dismiss Amended Third-Party Complaint. The parties have filed their responsive briefing and the matter is ripe for the Court’s consideration. Having fully reviewed the record herein, the Court finds that t