Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION “ We live in a world of deadlines____ The practice of law is no exception.” Raymond v. Ameritech Corp., 442 F.3d 600 (7th Cir.2006) Throughout the range of the law, there are time limits imposed on litigants at every stage of the case: some are

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-1770 City of Kaukauna, Wisconsin, Inter Lake Papers, Inc., and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent. On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 80 FERC para.para. 62,232, 62,233, 62,234 and 86 FERC para. 61,096. Argued December 1, 1999--Decided June 6, 2000 Before Bauer, Cudahy and Flaum, Circuit Judges. Cudahy, C

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Collette Campbell, currently proceeding pro se, brings the above-captioned action against the New York City *155Transit Authority, alleging claims of gender discrimination, age discrimination, disability discrimination, failure to accommo-. date, retaliation and c

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Central Wisconsin and its medial artery, the Fox River, are a rich source of history, as this case reveals. In this case, the petitioners each operate hydropower projects at federally owned dams on the Lower Fox River (the part of the river below Lake Winnebago). All of these projects are located downstream of the government-owned

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

167 Wis.2d 168 (1992) 482 N.W.2d 665 IN the MATTER OF the PAYMENT OF WITNESS FEES IN STATE v. HUISMAN: BROWN COUNTY, Appellant, v. STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Respondent. No. 91-1492. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Oral argument January 29, 1992. Decided February 11, 1992. *170 On behal

606 F.Supp. 1161 (1985) Lucy Peng-Fei CHANG v. UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Diane R. SELEEN, et al. v. BOARD OF REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Sandra KRAYNEK v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Wendy ROWORTH v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Civ. A. Nos. 77-0070 S, 79-0087 S, 83-0044 S and 83-0099 S

537 F.2d 182 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.16.33 ACRES OF LAND IN the COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA,and Sterling Investments, Inc., et al.,Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.156.65 ACRES OF LAND IN the COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA,andSterling Investments, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 75-3051, 76-1464

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge: These appeals1 present varied and complex issues of Florida case law and statutory construction which are particularly appropriate for resolution by the Florida Supreme Court. They demonstrate the utility of this marvelous device of certification2 in something other than the run-of-the-mill diversity case, for here the federal question on con

524 F.2d 79 8 ERC 1273, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,640 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andThe State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant,v.Howard H. CALLAWAY, as Secretary of the Army, et al.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 916, Docket 75-7048. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued June

Rugg, C.J. This is a suit in equity brought under G. L. c. 40, § 53, by ten or more taxable inhabitants of the town of Deerfield. The defendants are the trustees of the Deerfield Academy and Dickinson High School, hereafter called the academy, the town of Deerfield, hereafter called the town, and divers individuals alleged to be the selectmen, school committee, building committee and treasurer of the town. The allegations of the

The fourth issue defendants raise is plaintiff's use of cross references. E.g. , Pl. SAF ¶¶ 11, 16, 19, 21, 50, 128. Local Rule 56.1 requires citations to the record evidence rather than cross reference to a reference to a citation; using a cross reference saves counsel time but offloads on the court the burden of identifying what is factually disputed and whether the dispute is material. Schlessinger v. Chicago Hous. Auth. ,

WALLACE, Judge. Lane A. Houk challenges a final summary judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of PennyMac Corp., an entity that was substituted as the party plaintiff in place of CitiMortgage, Inc., during the pendency of the litigation in the circuit court. Because a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding PennyMac’s standing to foreclose, we reverse.

Saris, C.J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Patrick F. Downing was employed by Defendant Omnicare, Inc., a pharmacy services company, from 2004 until his termination in 2012. Plaintiff alleges that, in terminating his employment, Omnicare and Defendants Jeffrey Stamps, John Workman, Nitin Sahney, John Figueroa, and Priscilla Stewart-Jones1 , retaliated against him in vio

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of 18-17275 themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:13- cv-00057-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER AND v. AMENDED