Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Jacqueline Schropp”
Willis v. BW IP International Inc.public domain
811 F.Supp.2d 1146 (2011) Tina WILLIS, Plaintiff, v. BW IP INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. MDL No. 875. Case No. 09-02163. E.D. PA Civil Action No. 2:09-91449. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 29, 2011. *1147 James E. Chellis, Summerville, SC, John Berkley Grimball, Hopkins, SC, Thomas H. Hart, III,
PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Kelley v. School Board of Seminole County, 435 So.2d 804 (Fla.1983). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, COWART and DANIEL, JJ., concur.
Goltv, Inc. v. Fox Sports Latin America Ltd.public domain
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAG4, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants, Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (“Conmebol”), Fuji Play Group, S.A., and Alejandro Burzaco’s Consolidated Jurisdictional Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 203] Plaintiffs, GolTV, Inc. and Global Sports Partners LLP’s Amended Complaint [ECF No. 78]. The Court has carefully considered the Amended Complaint,
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: Catena appeals from an order of the district court prescribing the form of the notice to be sent to all members of the plaintiff class. We conclude that the order is not appealable and dismiss the appeal. Catena brought the underlying action on behalf of himself and all others who purchased Capitol Industries stock between June, 1969 and Dece
O'hare v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc.public domain
OPINION BY TODD, J.: ¶ 1 In this declaratory judgment action, UPMC Health Plan, Inc. (“UPMC”) appeals the July 30, 2003 order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas holding that UPMC has no right to recover overpayments of approximately $1.8 million which it paid to Appellees for generic prescription drugs. We reverse. ¶ 2 UPMC is a corporation that provides health insurance bene
SIMPSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants Harry Skydell and Arnold Dutchen, two of ninety-nine original and intervening plaintiffs in sixteen consolidated actions, seek to overturn two orders enforcing a stipulation of settlement entered by the district court, and to have the settlement declared void. We affirm, finding no error in the actions or orders of the district court.