Cases

In this divorce action, defendant served 39 nonparty subpoenas on the business office maintained by plaintiffs father. Each subpoena was addressed to a different entity closely held by, or affiliated with, plaintiff’s family, which has many real estate holdings. Plaintiff acknowledges that, before the marriage, she had minority interests in many of the entities and that during the marriage she transferred the interests in those companies to a single holdi

17 So.3d 1251 (2009) Sally Lynn JAFFE, Appellant, v. Todd B. JAFFE, Appellee. No. 5D08-3719. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. September 11, 2009. *1252 James R. Dressler, Cocoa Beach, for Appellant. Mark S. Peters of Eisenmenger, Berry & Peters, P.A., Viera, for Appellee. COHEN, J. We

*552In this divorce action, defendant served 37 nonparty subpoenas on the business office maintained by plaintiffs father. Each subpoena was addressed to a different entity closely held by, or affiliated with, plaintiff’s family, which has many real estate holdings. Plaintiff acknowledges that, before the marriage, she had minority interests in many of the entities and that during the marriage she

*826In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered January 8, 2001, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), dated June 26, 2006, as denied, without a hearing, that branch of his motion which was to hold the plaintiff in contempt based upon her alleged interference with his visitation

MARCIA SPECTER JAFFE, Appellant, v. STEVEN DONALD JAFFE, Appellee. No. 4D07-3388 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 10, 2008. Barbara J. Compiani and Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Robert B. Resnick of Law Office of Robert B. Resnick, Boca Raton, for appellant. Amy D. Shield of Amy D. Shield, P.A.,

In an action, inter a]ia, pursuant to RPAPL article 9 for the partition of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered August 9, 2005, as directed disbursement to the plaintiff of the sum of $60,095.11 in excess funds from a referee’s sale of the subject real property, and disbursement to him of the sum of only $16,201.20 from those funds.

GROSS, J. We affirm the temporary relief order under review. The husband complains about not having a full opportunity to be heard. The court granted the wife’s motion to extend the hearing to an hour. The transcript reveals that the court expended one hour and forty minutes at the temporary relief hearing. The court heard testimony, including that of both parties’ accountants. A court has wide latitude in controlling the testimony

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated April 19, 1994, which, inter alia, directed that he be incarcerated for nonpayment of child support unless he subsequently paid specified amounts of support arrears by certain dates. By decision and order on motion dated June 3, 1994, this Court stayed the enforcement of the order pending hearing

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

AFFIRMED.

Brigham v Jaffe (2020 NY Slip Op 07311) Brigham v Jaffe 2020 NY Slip Op 07311 Decided on December 08, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Brigham v Jaffe (2020 NY Slip Op 07311) Brigham v Jaffe 2020 NY Slip Op 07311 Decided on December 08, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

*899Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered December 12, 2011, which denied nonparty law firm’s motion for a judgment in its favor in the amount of the outstanding legal fees allegedly owed by plaintiff, its former client, and referred the issue of the law firm’s legal fees to a special referee for a hearing, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate the r

EMAS, J. Richard E. Jaffe (“Jaffe”) appeals the trial court’s order granting the petition of attorney Joy Carr (“Carr”) for attorney’s fees and costs, and the trial court’s order denying Jaffe’s petition to enforce a settlement agreement. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Jaffe’s son Michael Jaff

AFFIRMED.

*899Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered December 12, 2011, which denied nonparty law firm’s motion for a judgment in its favor in the amount of the outstanding legal fees allegedly owed by plaintiff, its former client, and referred the issue of the law firm’s legal fees to a special referee for a hearing, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate the r

Dismissed.

Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the qualified Justice is of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, wh

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY THE CASE CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judged I. INTRODUCTION This is an employment action in which Plaintiff Allen V. Jaffe asserts claims for retaliation, wrongful termination, and wage-and-hour violations under the California Labor Code and federal Fair Labor Standards Act against Defendants Tenet Healthcare Corporati

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 18-2726 IN RE: SCOTT N. JAFFE, Debtor-Appellee, APPEAL OF: LAVERNE WILLIAMS. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 17 C 04662 — John J. Tharp, Jr., Judge. ARGUED FEBRUARY 7, 2019 — DECIDED AUGUST 5, 2019 Before BA