Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jaime Alfredo Gonzalez”
NUMBER 13-04-054-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG _________________________________________
United States v. Esparza-Gonzalezpublic domain
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: In unrelated cases, Alfredo Esparza-Gonzalez and Jaime Gustavo Castillo-Ta-pia pleaded guilty to being aliens found in the United States subsequent to deportation. The cases have been consolidated on appeal, and present a single issue of first impression in this circuit:
Batiz Gonzalez v. Municipio de Poncepublic domain
TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION ACE Insurance Company (en adelante la peticionaria) recurre ante nos, solicitándonos que revisemos y *153dejemos sin efecto una determinación del Tribunal de Primera Instancia» Sala Superior de Ponce (Hon. Eduardo Estrella Morales, Juez), que declaró No Ha Lugar una "Moción de Sentencia Sumaria", presentada por ésta. L
in Re Fraudulent Hospital Lien Litigationpublic domain
NUMBER 13-19-00630-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI–EDINBURG IN RE FRAUDULENT HOSPITAL LIEN LITIGATION On appeal from MDL No. 15-0360-H in the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Ti
822 F.2d 1213 23 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 498 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Orlando MOLINARES CHARRIS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Juan PIMIENTA REDONDO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Santiago MENESES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Alfredo LOZADA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of A
968 F.2d 415 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alberto ROJAS-MARTINEZ and Olavo Michel, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose CARILLO-RUIZ, Martin Casas-Acevedo, EfrainGonzalez-Torres, Roberto Herrera, Miguel Herrera,and Alfredo Reyes-Marentes, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 91-8218, 91-8298. United States Court of Appea
U.S. v. Rojas-Martinezpublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: I. The six defendants in No. 91-8298 1 and the two defendants in No. 91-8218 2 were arrested after they were discovered illegally crossing the United States-Mexico border. After placing the defendants in c
Pereora v. State Ins. Fund Corp. of the Com. of Prpublic domain
715 F.Supp.2d 230 (2010) Alfredo Pinero PEREORA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. STATE INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-2128 (GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 19, 2010. *231 Jose F. Quetglas, Quetglas Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. J
Ponce Super Center, Inc. v. Glenwood Holdings Inc.public domain
359 F.Supp.2d 27 (2005) PONCE SUPER CENTER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. GLENWOOD HOLDINGS INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 04-2252(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 31, 2005. *28 Jorge Martinez-Luciano, Pedro Ortiz Alvarez Law Offices, Ponce, PR, for Plaintiffs. Alfredo F. Ramirez-MacDonald, He
Alfredo Bussati v. Grace & Compania, Puerto Ricopublic domain
COFFIN, Circuit Judge. Appellants, all residents of Puerto Rico, brought an action in March 1967 against appellee, Grace & Compañía, Puerto Rico (Grace), a Delaware corporation, in the United States District Court of Puerto Rico. All appellants had been employed at Grace’s Arecibo mill during 1959, except for three appellants who
Kellogg USA, Inc. v. B. Fernandez Hermanos, Inc.public domain
(2007) KELLOGG USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. B. FERNANDEZ HERMANOS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-1213 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 27, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the counterclaim for lack of jurisdiction (Docket No.
United States v. Castillo-Tapiapublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _________________ No. 01-50213 (Summary Calendar) _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALFREDO ESPARZA-GONZALEZ, also known as Juan Valdez, Defendant - Appellant. _________________ No. 01-50262 (Sum
United States v. Dockpublic domain
293 F.Supp.2d 704 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Troy Phillip DOCK, et al., Defendants. No. 4:02-CR-62. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. November 12, 2003. *705 *706 Jaime Alberto Pena, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sherman, TX, for U.S. Government. Jose Monsiv
Morales-Figueroa v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentariapublic domain
550 F.Supp.2d 220 (2007) Julio MORALES-FIGUEROA, et al., Plaintiffs v. BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, Defendant. Civil No. 05-1424 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 9, 2007. *221 Anibal Escanellas-Rivera, Escanellas & Juan, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Pedro J. Manzano-Yates, Rosa M. Mendez-S
Bath v. Statepublic domain
951 S.W.2d 11 (1997) Jaime Gonzalez BATH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 13-94-460-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. May 22, 1997. Rehearing Overruled August 14, 1997. *13 David L. Botsford, Austin, for Appellant. Jose M. Rubio, District Attorney, Monica Z. Notzon, Asst. Distr
People v. Bahenapublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and Illinois Official Reports
Dominguez v. Paynepublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice VALDEZ. This is an appeal from a no-evidence *868summary judgment. The appellants1 raise two points of error: 1) the trial court erred in rendering a no-evidence summary judgment because the motion filed by the appellee was legally insufficient, and 2) the trial court er
United States v. Porras-Avilapublic domain
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Judge *708Juan Angel Porras-Avila ("Porras-Avila" or "Defendant") is charged with illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He seeks to have his indictment dismissed bec
United States v. Lozanopublic domain
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Court Judge Omar Hernandez Lozano ("Hernandez Lozano") and Juan Gabriel Ruiz-Baena ("Ruiz-Baena") are charged with illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and § 1326(a) respectively. They seek to have their indictments dismissed because the
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I