⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James B. Scott”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-01-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 3, 2012 CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON v. JAMES B. SCOTT ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Roane County No. 14422 Walter C. Kurtz, Senior Judge No. E2010-01660-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JANUARY 17, 2012 The plaintiff filed this civil action in the shadow of a criminal case brought again
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 215 So. 3d 178; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4416
EVANDER, J. The State appeals an order suppressing evidence secured pursuant to a search warrant. Because there was probable cause to support the search warrant, we reverse. The search warrant affidavit was executed by Detective Kuzma on October 7, 2015. Kuzma averred that there was probable cause to believe that cocaine and methamphetamine were being kept
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2017-06-29 · Published · cited 4× · 223 So. 3d 1130; 2017 WL 2823094
HUGHES, J. * [! This case presents the res nova issue of whether an attorney, representing an incarcerated felon, is subject to the provisions of La. R.S. 44:31.1, when making a public records request to obtain information relative to a potential post-conviction relief application. Both the district court and the appella
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2018-06-19 · Published · cited 15× · 588 B.R. 122
JOSEPH M. MEIER, U. S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Introduction Before the Court is a summary judgment motion filed by Bryan and Kristina Herrera ("Plaintiffs"). Dkt. No. 7. Chapter 7 debtor James H. Scott ("Defendant") opposes the motion.1 Dkt. No. 9. *127The Defend
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008-06-23 · Published · cited 2× · 663 S.E.2d 58; 378 S.C. 452; 2008 S.C. LEXIS 185
378 S.C. 452 (2008) 663 S.E.2d 58 MICHAEL SCOTT B. and Andrea M., Respondents, v. MELISSA M., Everett H., and Dylan & Grace, Minors Under the Age of Seven (7) Years, Defendants, of whom Melissa M. is Petitioner. No. 26507. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard May 6, 2008. Decided June 23, 2008.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2010-09-13 · Published · cited 1× · 436 B.R. 582; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3045; 2010 WL 3633927
436 B.R. 582 (2010) In re WALTER B. SCOTT & SONS, INC., Debtor. Financial Federal Credit Inc., Plaintiff, v. Walter B. Scott & Sons, Inc., Dennis J. Scott, James B. Scott, Bonnie J. Scott, and Kelly F. Scott, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-20996-TLM. Adversary No. 09-07037-TLM. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. September 13, 2010.
Scott v. Clarkepublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 391 F. Supp. 3d 610
NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (dkt. 554) and Defendants' Motion Pursuant to Rule 59(e) (dkt. 556). Both motions request alteration or amendment of the Court's January 2, 2019 Injunction (dkt. 545). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part each motion.
Scott v. Clarkepublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019-01-02 · Published · cited 8× · 355 F. Supp. 3d 472
NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an Eighth Amendment class action concerning the long-term failure to provide adequate medical care to inmates at the Fluvanna (Va.) Correctional Center for Women (FCCW). FCCW is Virginia's primary women's medical prison. The present defendants are officials employed by the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC).1 After years
Scott v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 262 So. 3d 746
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. COHEN, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Scott v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 262 So. 3d 746
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. COHEN, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Scott v. Durhampublic domain
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 772 F. Supp. 2d 978; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17058; 2011 WL 704728
772 F.Supp.2d 978 (2011) James F. SCOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy S. DURHAM, et al., Defendants. Cause No. 1:09-CV-00348. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. February 18, 2011. *979 C. Erik Chickedantz, Jeffrey P. Smith, Hawk Haynie Kammeyer & Chickedantz LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, James M. Lewis,
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2010-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
Dismissed in Part; Affirmed in Part; Reversed and Remanded in Part; and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed March 16, 2010. In The Fo
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005-04-21 · Published · cited 10× · 406 F.3d 1340
HULL, Circuit Judge: Appellant Daniel G. Hamm (the “Trustee”), the Trustee in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases of Debtors-Appellees Tomeka Scott James, Linda Sankey, and Hope Ho-neycutt (collectively, the “Debtors”), objected to the Debtors’ claims for federal earned income tax credit (“EITC”) exemptions in their individual bankruptcy cases. The bankruptcy court overruled the Trus
Scott v. Clarkepublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014-11-20 · Published · cited 2× · 61 F. Supp. 3d 569; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 349; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162662; 2014 WL 6609087
MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. Plaintiffs, all prisoners residing at Flu-vanna Correctional Center for Women (“FCCW”), a facility of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections (the ‘VDOC”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants1 violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to
In re Scottpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013-01-11 · Published · cited 6× · 488 B.R. 246; 2013 WL 765691
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES P. SMITH, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court are two Chapter 13 cases where the Trustee objects to confirmation because the debtors are not committing certain social security benefits to their Chapter 13 plans. Hearings on confirmation and the Trustee’s objections were held on October 9, 2012. Since both cases present similar issues, the Court will publish one opinion addre
Scott v. Clarkepublic domain
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014-11-25 · Published · cited 17× · 64 F. Supp. 3d 813; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164822; 2014 WL 6680691
MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. Plaintiffs, all prisoners residing at Flu-vanna Correctional Center for Women (“FCCW”), a facility of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections (the “VDOC”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to be free from cruel and unusual puni
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Carter Scott d/b/a Carter * From the 32nd District Court Scott Land Services, of Nolan County, Trial Court No. 19,563-A. Vs. No. 11-16-00091-CV * December 8, 2016 Ollie Stephen Oatman; Tamra * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed December 8, 2016 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-16-00091-CV ___________ CARTER SCOTT D/B/A CARTER SCOTT LAND SERVICES, Appellant V. OLLIE STEPHEN OATMAN; TAMRA SHAE OATMAN; LEIGH OATMAN, TRUSTEE FOR THE CALLIE OATMAN TRUST; AN
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 212 So. 3d 879; 2016 WL 2860846; 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 306
BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Scotty B. Lyles, appearing pro se, appeals the Oktibbeha County Circuit Court’s dismissal of his motion for post-conviction relief (PCR). Finding no error, we affirm. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2. On May 22, 2006, Lyles robbed the Tobacco Shed, a conven
Hand v. Scottpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2018-02-01 · Published · cited 3× · 285 F. Supp. 3d 1289
But Florida does not use the least-restrictive means to pursue its interests in preventing possibly irresponsible citizens from choosing their leaders. "[E]ven when pursuing a legitimate interest, a State may not choose means that unnecessarily restrict constitutionally protected liberty." Kusper , 414 U.S. at 58-59,