⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Charles Vance”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-03-15 · Published · cited 191× · 481 F.3d 110; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5951
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs in this case are a group of investors in various Eaton Vance mutual funds. They brought this putative class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Koeltl, J.) to recover for wrongs they allege to have suffered at the hands of the *114Eaton Vance corporate empire and several affiliated entities.
Vance v. Sukuppublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996-12-23 · Published · cited 4× · 558 N.W.2d 683; 207 Wis. 2d 578; 1996 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1632
207 Wis.2d 578 (1996) 558 N.W.2d 683 Antwaun VANCE, a minor, by his g/a/l Jacqueline Boynton, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James J. SUKUP, First Financial Bank, Royal Insurance, d/b/a Globe Indemnity Company, and Wisconsin Health Organization, Defendants-Respondents, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE GROUP, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 95-2851. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.</
People v. Vancepublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/7/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E079750 v. (Super.Ct.No. FSB032415) GREGORY VANCE, JR., OPINION Defendant and Appellant.
People v. Vancepublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/29/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, E079750 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. FSB032415) v.
Trump v. Vance, Jr.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-11-04 · Published · cited 25× · 941 F.3d 631
19‐3204 Trump v. Vance, Jr. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _______________ AUGUST TERM, 2019 (Argued: October 23, 2019 Decided: November 4, 2019) Docket No. 19‐3204 _______________ DONALD J. TRUMP,
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 26, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
Miller v. Vancepublic domain
Indiana Supreme Court · 1984-05-18 · Published · cited 18× · 463 N.E.2d 250; 1984 Ind. LEXIS 824
463 N.E.2d 250 (1984) Charles E. MILLER, Kay F. Miller, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. Richard G. VANCE, Vicki J. Vance, Madison County Bank and Trust Company, Anderson Banking Company, Floyd Jackey, Betty A. Vance, James L. Robinson, June L. Robinson, Dewain McCarroll, Cynthia D. McCarroll, Appellees (Defendants below). No. 483S146. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 18, 1984.</
Vance v. Ricepublic domain
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981-10-30 · Published · cited 2× · 524 F. Supp. 1297; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15640
524 F.Supp. 1297 (1981) Phillip Charles VANCE, Plaintiff, v. Bob RICE, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 81-432-C. United States District Court, S. D. Iowa, C. D. October 30, 1981. *1298 Roger P. Owens, John C. Wellman and John J. Piazza, Des Moines, Iowa, for plaintiff. Dan L. Johnston, Polk County Atty., James A. Smith, Asst.
Proctor v. Vancepublic domain
Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2006-08-24 · Published · cited 0× · 139 Ohio Misc. 2d 93; 2006 Ohio 4677; 860 N.E.2d 1099
ROBERT P. Ringland, Judge. {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion in limine, filed on August 18, 2006. The defendant filed a memorandum in opposition on August 21, 2006. The court has considered the memoranda and relevant legal authority and renders the following decision. {¶ 2} Trial in this matter has been set to determine the value of the defendant’s property, which is being approp
Vance v. Latimerpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009-08-11 · Published · cited 6× · 648 F. Supp. 2d 914; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70010; 2009 WL 2476316
648 F.Supp.2d 914 (2009) Nancy Ellen VANCE, Plaintiff, v. Charles Odell LATIMER, Defendant. No. 08-CV-10632-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 11, 2009. *916 Jeffrey P. Thennisch, Hattem A. Beydoun, Dobrusin and Thennisch, Pontiac, MI, for Plaintiff. ORDER ADOPTING MAGIST
New York Court of Appeals · 2016-06-28 · Published · cited 204× · 27 N.Y.3d 652; 57 N.E.3d 53
*659 OPINION OF THE COURT Abdus-Salaam, J. The primary issue in these appeals is whether the trial courts abused their discretion in precluding any cross-examination into allegations of a law enforcement officer’s prior misconduct made in an unrelated federal lawsuit. These cases s
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2022-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0314 Filed December 7, 2022 JAMES FETTKETHER and CANDICE FETTKETHER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. GRUNDY COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, BARBARA SMITH, CHARLES BAKKER, HEIDI NEDERHOFF, JAMES ROSS, and MARK SCHILDROTH, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Grundy County,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986-12-31 · Published · cited 7× · 807 F.2d 1528; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 36822
PER CURIAM: This case has been before this court previously. In U.S. v. Cannon, 778 F.2d 747 (11th Cir.1985) we held “that in imposing sentence without adjudicating guilt the district court clearly exceeded the scope of its judicial authority.” Id. at 749. Cannon, who was charged with four c
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985-12-23 · Published · cited 5× · 778 F.2d 747; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25437
PER CURIAM: James Cannon was charged with firearms violations in a four-count indictment. Pursuant to a plea agreement he pleaded guilty to one of the counts, falsification of federal firearms forms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(m). As part of the plea agreement the government agreed not to oppose probation. At the request of the defense the trial judge deferred adjudication u
People v. Vancepublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1979-05-24 · Published · cited 152× · 390 N.E.2d 867; 76 Ill. 2d 171; 28 Ill. Dec. 508; 1979 Ill. LEXIS 294
76 Ill.2d 171 (1979) 390 N.E.2d 867 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. JEFFREY VANCE, Appellee. No. 50675. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed May 24, 1979. *172 *173 *174 *175
Wehr v. Vancepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976-03-15 · Published · cited 0× · 343 So. 2d 1081; 1976 La. App. LEXIS 3370
SAMUEL, Judge. Plaintiff filed this suit against defendant, an incorporated musical group, for past due wages. He does not claim statutory penalties and attorney’s fees. Defendant answered, denying any wages were due. After trial, there was judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $1,148.71. Defendant appeals. Plaintiff was employed by the defendant in February, 1974 as a singer at a salary of $
People v. Vancepublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977-10-04 · Published · cited 4× · 368 N.E.2d 758; 53 Ill. App. 3d 573; 11 Ill. Dec. 207; 1977 Ill. App. LEXIS 3494
368 N.E.2d 758 (1977) 53 Ill. App.3d 573 11 Ill.Dec. 207 PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles VANCE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 76-297. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. October 4, 1977. *760 James Geis, Deputy State Appellate Def
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-11-07 · Published · cited 187× · 701 F.3d 193; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23084; 2012 WL 5416500
WOOD, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. Civilized societies do not condone torture committed by governmental agents, no matter what job title the agent holds. I am confident that every member of this court would agree with that proposition. This is therefore a case of system failure: plaintiffs Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel assert that representatives of the U.S. government (who happened to be mem
Orrison v. Vancepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971-06-01 · Published · cited 34× · 277 A.2d 573; 262 Md. 285; 1971 Md. LEXIS 927
262 Md. 285 (1971) 277 A.2d 573 ORRISON v. VANCE [No. 449, September Term, 1970.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 1, 1971. The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ. Arthur Dale Leach for appellant. James F. Vance and Charles L. Richards for ap
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2022-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
NOS. 12-22-00209-CR 12-22-00210-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST EX PARTE: § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT LANCE CHARLES CONKLIN