Cases

*1158 Opinion WERDEGAR, J. Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (e) (section 1170(e)) 1 authorizes certain prison authorities to recommend that the superior court recall a previously imposed sentence because the prisoner i

Filed 5/29/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D062693 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD225263) JAMES ALDEN LOPER, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the

*64OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Ordered that the judgment of conviction is reversed, on the law, the plea of guilty and the order denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence are vacated, defendant’s motion is granted, and the accusatory instrument is dismissed. The People charged defendant and two codefendants, in an information, with

660 S.E.2d 98 (2008) John R. KUCAN, Jr., and Terry Coates, Plaintiffs v. ADVANCE AMERICA, Cash Advance Centers of North Carolina, Inc.; Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.; and William M. Webster, IV, Defendants. Lisa Hager and Ira Nebraska Hall, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Check Into Cash of North Carolina, Inc., Check Into Cash, Inc., Jones Management Services, LLC, W. Alla

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The Plaintiff Donya Leigh Anderson appeals from the district court’s order granting final summary judgment to the defendant, UNUM Provident Corporation (“UNUM”) in this diversity action for breach of contract, fraud, suppression, and bad faith because UNUM denied Anderson’s claim for long term disability benefits. The district court held that UNUM’s long

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 8, 2026 Decided July 28, 2026 No. 18-1149 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND LEE M. ZELDIN, RESPONDENTS AIR PERMITTING FORUM, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 21-1039, 21-12

The appellant, Cynthia Y. Woods, was convicted of theft by deception in the first degree,1 in violation of § 13A-8-2(2), §13A-8-3(a) Code of Alabama 1975. The appellant was sentenced to 20 years in prison. The appellant raises six issues on appeal. The state's evidence tended to show that during March 1991 and February 1992, the appellant extorted approximate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17 - 36 (LLA) v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), brings this action against De

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17 - 36 (LLA) v. UNDER SEAL BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit I

386 F.Supp.2d 461 (2005) JSC FOREIGN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION TECHNOSTROYEXPORT, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRADE SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 5562(JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 6, 2005. *462 Craig L. Lowenthal, Ira M. Feinberg, Matthew A. Michaels, Tracey A. Tiska, H

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 24, 2025 Decided April 17, 2026 No. 22-1071 SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, PETITIONER v. KC TRANSPORT, INC. AND FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United St

OPALA, J. ¶ 1 This court granted certiorari to settle the first impression question whether a claim may be brought under Oklahoma’s wrongful death statute1 on behalf of a nonviable fetus *442born alive. We are asked to decide whether the trial court committed reversible error by instructing the jury that damages are recoverable only if the

On Petition for Rehearing. McMahan, C. J. Our statements in the principal opinion, wherein we said that appellant employed about 400 men in and around its mine, all of whom lived in Vincennes, and that Mr. Wehr continued his work in the office until it was about time for the train to start, are not strictly correct. We should have said that appellant employed in and around its mine about 400 men who lived in

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE