Cases

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge: This disability discrimination case concerns the circumstances under which equitable estoppel or equitable tolling will excuse the failure to file a timely EEOC charge. We hold that a plaintiffs reasonable reliance on fraudulent concealment is required for application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel. We also hold that equitable tolling will not excuse the untimely filing of an EEOC charge by a

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. A Chicago ordinance criminalizes an individual’s refusal to leave a scene when so instructed by a police officer when three or more individuals are engaging in disorderly conduct nearby. Buddy Bell was arrested under that ordinance, the enforcement of which he presently seeks to enjoin as facially violative of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The distri

WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The sole issue on this appeal is whether the district court erred in not requiring the defendant to answer interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff. A lawsuit is not so rule-bound that one side wins whenever the other side breaks a rule. To succeed in an appeal based on an infraction o

CALLOWAY, J., Pro Tempore; It The 'defendant, James Anthony Bell, was convicted by a jury of 10 counts of indecent behavior with juveniles, in violation of La. R.S. 14:81(A)(1). He was subsequently sentenced to seven years at hard labor and a $5,000.00 fíne on each count. The trial court ordered the sentences for counts 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10 to run consecutively, and the sentences for 2, 4, 5 and 8 to run concurrently. The d

172 P.3d 622 (2007) 2007 OK CR 43 Cheryl Lynn BELL, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-2005-1185. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. November 15, 2007. *623 John Hunsucker, James Todd, Oklahoma City, OK, Attorneys for Defendant at trial. Bret Burns, Tyler Lowe, Assistant District At

*962 BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. James W. Bell was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appeals the sentence of seventy-seven months imposed by the District Court. 1 Bell argues the District Court erred 1) by denying him a sentenc

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Bell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Bell has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therei

54 So.3d 1226 (2010) Johnny BELL, Jr. v. MID CITY PRINTERS, INC. No. 2010-CA-0818. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. December 22, 2010. *1229 Michael W. Whitehead, Michael W. Whitehead, LLC, Livingston, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Bradley P. Naccari, Juge Napolitano Guilbeau Ruli Frieman & Whiteley, Metair

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiff Amar Bell, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Drs. Alexis Gen-*557dell and Paul Adler for injuries arising out of medical treatment Plaintiff received while incarcerated in Westchester County Jail.1 For the reasons given below, Defendants’ Motio

713 F.Supp.2d 717 (2010) In re James A.H. BELL. No. 1:10-mc-002. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. April 9, 2010. W. Morris Kizer, Gentry, Tipton & McLemore, PC, Knoxville, TN, for James A.H. Bell. MEMORANDUM & ORDER CURTIS L. COLLIER, Chief Judge. On August 13, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge C.

Karen King Mitchell, Judge Western Surety Company (Surety) appeals the entry of judgment against it on Rashaunda Bell’s petition for payment of money owed under a motor vehicle dealer bond issued by Surety and its principal, KC Trend Auto, in favor of the State of Missouri. Surety brings four points on appeal, all arguing that it should not have been held liable for the full amount of the bond ($25,000). Finding no error, we

R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Defendants Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard and 3M move to dismiss plaintiffs' medical monitoring claims, arguing that Colorado's appellate courts have not recognized such a cause of action. Tyco and Chemguard alternatively request that the issue be certified to the Colorado Supreme Court. Several other defendants ask to join one or both of the motions to dismiss. I decline to certify the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John James Bell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

716 S.E.2d 868 (2011) Robert Edward BELL, Plaintiff, v. James W. MOZLEY, Jr., Defendant. No. COA11-393. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 1, 2011. *869 W. Wallace Respess, Jr., Lenoir, for plaintiff appellee. Morrow Porter Vermitsky & Fowler, PLLC, by Katie Foster Fowler and John F. Morrow, Winston Salem, fo

PER CURIAM. Jonathan Bell timely appeals from his convictions for attempted second-degree murder, attempted robbery with a firearm, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm the convictions and sentences without discussion but remand with directions that the trial court correct an error in the judgment as it relates to the attem

OPINION MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. Defendanb-Appellant James Dalton Bell (“Bell”) appeals his jury trial conviction and ten-year sentence for interstate stalking and using the facilities of interstate commerce for interstate stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A and 2261A (2)(B)(i), alleging error in the handling of his efforts to obta

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. *292 Defendants Ricky J. Bell ("Bell"), Gaelan Doss ("Doss"), and James Horton ("Horton") (together, "Defendants") appeal the first district court's 1 order granting Plaintiff Jane Luna ("Luna"), a

RULING AND ORDER MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Harold R. Bell claims that officials at the MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution subjected him to unconstitutional conditions of confinement and showed deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. Mr. Bell’s claims, brought under 42 U.S.C

PER CURIAM: * Jesse Lee Bell, Jr., Texas prisoner # 614588, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Bell argues that the district court erred by dismissing his equal protection claims, as well as his claims relating to prison grievance procedures. He contends that he was threatened with retaliation for using the grievan

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-4343 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. QUINTIN ANTONIO BELL, a/k/a Quinton Antonio Bell, a/k/a Quinten Antonio Bell, a/k/a Go-Go, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarro