Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00662-CV Hamlet I. DAVIS III and Margaret Jane Davis, Appellants v. Donald V. LUBY Jr. and James Donald Morris, Appellees From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr Count

*487[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals September 3, 2015.] ¶1 Cox, J. Michael James Morris seeks collateral relief from the judgment and sentence following his conviction of first degree assault of his six-week-old baby, A.M. Because he fails in his burden to show that he was actually and substantially prejudiced by his trial co

Denied by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Schindler and Leach, JJ. Now published at 189 Wn. App. 484.

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gillen and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy C

OPINION AND ORDER PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff James B. Morris filed this legal malpractice action against his former attorneys, defendants Evans & Zusman, PC (“Evans & Zusman”), Michael C. Zusman (“Zusman,” and, collectively with Evans & Zusman, the “Evans & Zusman defendants”), Sussman Shank LP (“Sussman Shank”), Nena Cook (“Cook”), Jeff D. Brecht (“Brecht

CAVANAGH, J. These combined cases require us to examine the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 USC 1901 through 1963. In particular, we must decide several issues relating to ICWA’s notice provision, 25 USC 1912(a), which mandates that notice of certain involuntary child custody proceedings be sent to the appropriate Indian tribe or to the Secretary of the Interior “where the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child

925 N.E.2d 1069 (2010) 236 Ill.2d 345 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. James MORRIS, Appellant. The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Jesse Holborow, Appellant. Nos. 105989, 106592. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 22, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 22, 2010.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lonnie D. Morris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and agree that Morris failed to comply with the requirements

ALTENBERND, Judge. P.I.E., LLC, appeals an order that dismissed its amended complaint with prejudice. We affirm the dismissal as to count II of the amended complaint but reverse the dismissal as to count I. Count I alleged a claim under the Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act. See § 70.001, Fla. Stat. (2007) (the “Bert Harris Act”). The trial court granted De-Soto County’s motion to dismiss thi

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMES RENALDO, Appellant, v. FINANCIAL PORTFOLIOS II, INC., as successor in interest to WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. f/k/a WACHOVIA; and CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Appellees. No. 2D20-3275 Septembe

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMES H. SWEETMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I through IV and parts VI through VIII of the Discussion. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 568 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT EDWIN JAMES CASE, III, DOC #S05099, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )

385 S.C. 215 (2009) 684 S.E.2d 168 Louis M. JAMISON and Evelyn Jamison, Respondents, v. John M. MORRIS and Kevin Morris d/b/a Morris Texaco Mini Mart, Anderson Oil Co. Inc., Texaco, Inc., and Shell Oil Company, Defendants, of whom John M. Morris and Kevin Morris d/b/a Texaco Mini Mart, Anderson Oil Co. Inc., and Texaco, Inc. are the Appellants. No. 26720. Supreme Court of So

MEMORANDUM YOUNG1, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This cause is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. Based Pl.’s Opt Out Engle Class (“Defs.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 24, plaintiffs response in opposition, PL’s Resp. Opp’n Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. Based Class Membership (“PL’s Resp.”),

OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Christina McClellan appeals the judgment entered in favor of defendant-appel-lees after a jury trial. Defendant I-Flow Corporation cross-appeals the district court’s denial of costs. We vacate and remand for a new trial, and dismiss I-Flow’s cross-appeal as moot. I. BACKGROUND

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIAM W. WELLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-05-165 JRJ ) MORRIS JAMES LLP, )

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 223 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 224 A jury found defendant Charles Glenn Norman guilty of second degree murder of his six-year-old son. (Pen. Code, §

Upon review of all the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner with minor modifications as follows: The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before

Opinion filed April 19, 2018 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________ Nos. 11-18-00022-CR, 11-18-00023-CR, 11-18-00024-CR, 11-18-00025-CR, & 11-18-00026-CR ____________ TOMMY JAMES MORRIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from t