Cases

Acting Justice TOAL. The underlying dispute in this case involves the repair of faulty windows and sliding glass doors in a condominium development, Shipyard Village Horizontal Property Regime (Shipyard Village), in Pawleys Island, South Carolina. Fifty co-owners of units in Buildings C & D of the development (Petitioners) appeal the court of appeals’ decision reversing the

KONDUROS, J. The Shipyard Village Council of Co-Owners, Inc. (the Council) appeals the circuit court’s grant of partial summary judgment to owners of condominiums within the development in the case involving faulty windows and sliding doors. The Council argues it did not have a duty to investigate, the business judgment rule should have applied, and a jury could have found it did not breach any duty. We affirm in part, reverse

08/05/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 30, 2020 Session EARLE J. FISHER, ET AL. v. TRE HARGETT, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 20-043

08/05/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 30, 2020 Session EARLE J. FISHER, ET AL. v. TRE HARGETT, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 20-043

08/05/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 30, 2020 Session EARLE J. FISHER ET AL. v. TRE HARGETT ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 20-0435-III Ellen

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 10, 2011 Decided June 1, 2012 No. 11-5092 MORRIS D. DAVIS, APPELLEE v. JAMES H. BILLINGTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS, APPELLEE DANIEL P. MULHOLLAN, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, APPELLANT

JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Sharon McCartney (Sharon) and Leslie McCartney (Les), wife and husband, sought declaratory relief that Les’s umbrella policy with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) provided coverage for injuries sustained by Sharon as a result of Les’s neglige

210 Ga. App. 711 (1993) 437 S.E.2d 344 FISHER v. CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. A93A1285. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 14, 1993. Reconsideration Denied October 29, 1993. Thomas M. Hunter, for appellant. Glover & Blount, Percy J. Blount, Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harpe

RUIZ, Senior Judge: In this appeal, appellant James Black-mon claims that he is entitled to reversal of his convictions and a new trial because his appointed counsel had a continuing conflict of interest as a result of an error made in the course of considering the government’s plea offer. We conclude that the trial court recognized the actual conflict of interest that was pre

662 F.3d 1120 (2011) Alfred ALBANO, an unmarried man; Monica Lewis, an unmarried woman; Samantha Baker, an individual; Ariel Barr, an unmarried man; Phillip Barr, a single man; Keith Bodie, husband; Stacy Bodie, wife; Jon L. Bruce, an individual; Craig Burke, husband; Linda Burke, wife; Dawn R. Cain, an individual; Christina Carlson, an individual; Charles Chen, husband; Lisa Chen, wife; Christopher Cordasco, an individual; Paul Crandell, husband; Jennif

192 Mich. App. 371 (1991) 481 N.W.2d 743 STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. FISHER Docket No. 119469. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided December 30, 1991, at 9:00 A.M. Draugelis & Ashton (by John A. Ashton), for State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. Garan, Lucow, Miller, Seward, Cooper & Becker, P.C.<

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00207-CV EMIEL W. OWENS, JR., Appellant V. JAMES E. MASON AND SHELLY GODFREY, Appellees On Appeal from the 506th District Court Grimes County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1942 Filed May 12, 2017 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellees, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Thomas G. Reidel, Judge. Defendant appeals district court ruling certifyi

02/07/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 3, 2019 Session JAMES A. DUNLAP, JR. v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 18-449-II Don R. Ash, Senior Judge

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. A pharmaceutical company holding the patent on a drug sues the manufacturer of a generic version of that drug for patent infringement. The patent-holder and the generic manufacturer later settle, with the former paying the latter not to produce a generic until the patents at issue expire. In FTC v. Actav

OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: We hold that a residential community that has continuously operated as a retirement community for persons age 55 or older can qualify for the housing for older persons exemption from the Fair Housing Act’s prohibition on familial status discrimination by establishing that it currently satisfies the exemption’s three statutory and regulatory criteria at the time of t

OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. This opinion addresses two sets of consolidated appeals concerning two pharmaceutical drugs: Lipitor and Effexor XR. In both sets of consolidated appeals, plaintiffs allege that the companies holding the patents related to Lipitor and Effexor XR fraudulently procured and enforced certain of those patents. Plaintiffs further all

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Yolanda Henderson brought this putative class action against U.S. Patent Commission, Ltd. and several of its employees, The Gray Law Group and several of its employees, and two defendants who have been dismissed. Doc. 72. Earlier in the litigation, Defendants moved to compel arbitration, Docs. 33, 36, and the court granted the motio

540 F.3d 1082 (2008) Michael J. SHANKS; Joan E. Shanks; Gregory Higgins; Thomas Fuchs; Colleen Fuchs; Patricia Mackin; G. Kay Cobb; Fred Hare; Josephine Hare; Robert Groman; Larry Oas, Plaintiffs, and Douglas Byrd; Karen Kinzerbyrd; Laurel Havens; Kathleen Riley; Vern Byrd; Mary Byrd; Raymond Kelleher; Catherine Kelleher; Gregory Byrd; Kareena Byrd; Joyce J. Cleveland; Gregory Mills; Patt A. Mills; Mary Eberle; Nate Eberle; Dr. Philip A. Lenoue, Sr.;

ORDER The Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing is premature because there has been no judgment. See Fed. R.App. P. 40(a)(1). Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing is construed as a motion to amend the certification order, and is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The certification order of this court issued on January 3, 2011, is amended as follows: At slip opinion page 39, in the first full paragr