Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James J. Heckethorn”
In Re Daileypublic domain
289 B.R. 157 (2003) In re Bruce F. DAILEY, Michaele P. Dailey, Debtors. No. 02-30650-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana. February 20, 2003. *158 Pierre L. Bacheller, II, Billings, MT, for BMW Financial Services. James Craig Bartlett, Kalispell, MT, for Bruce F. Dailey and Michaele P. Dailey. Jon R. Binney, Misso
Great Basin Water Network v. State Eng'rpublic domain
234 P.3d 912 (2010) GREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK, a Nonprofit Organization; Defenders of Wildlife, a Nonprofit Corporation; Edgar Alder; Clark W. Miles; Raymond E. Timm; Theodore Stazeski; Sheldon M. Edwards; Kathryn Hill; Kenneth F. Hill; Scotty Heer; Beth B. Anderson; Susan L. Geary; Donald W. Geary; Robert Ewing; Pamela Jensen; Bruce Jensen; Renee A. Alder; Robert J. Nickerson; Joyce B. Nickerson; Edward J. Weisbrot; Alexander Rose, Executive Director of
Dogwood Valley Citizens Ass'n v. Shifflettpublic domain
654 S.E.2d 894 (2008) DOGWOOD VALLEY CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Raymond James SHIFFLETT, Jr., et al. Record No. 070143. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 11, 2008. *895 George H. Dygert (Dygert, Wright, Hobbs & Heilberg, on brief), Charlottesville, for appellant. Frank K. Friedman (Richard C. Maxwell, Woods Rogers,
Maxey v. Heckethornpublic domain
Mr. Chief Justice Breese delivered the opinion of the Court: This was an action of assumpsit in the Fayette Circuit Court brought by Henry Heckethorn against John Maxey and Philip IL Howard, trading and doing business under the firm name of Maxey and Howard. The plaintiff obtained a verdict which the court refused to set aside on motion and reasons filed, and rendered a judgm
State of Iowa v. David Sean Hunterpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-1325 Filed October 19, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DAVID SEAN HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Story County, James C. Ellefson, Judge. David Sean Hunter appeals his conviction of first-degree murder. AFFIRMED. Tiffany Kr
Great Basin Water Network v. State Eng'rpublic domain
222 P.3d 665 (2010) GREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK, A Nonprofit Organization; Defenders of Wildlife, A Nonprofit Corporation; Edgar Alder; Clark W. Miles; Raymond E. Timm; Theodore Stazeski; Sheldon M. Edwards; Kathryn Hill; Kenneth F. Hill; Scotty Heer; Beth B. Anderson; Susan L. Geary; Donald W. Geary; Robert Ewing; Pamela Jensen; Bruce Jensen; Renee A. Alder; Robert J. Nickerson; Joyce B. Nickerson; Edward J. Weisbrot; Alexander Rose, Executive Director of
JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge. A. J. Industries, Inc. (herein “plaintiff”) brought suit against The Dayton Steel Foundry Company (herein “defendant”) for infringement of Ward Patent No. 2,841,414, which plaintiff *358 owned. Defendant denied infringement
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.public domain
127 S.Ct. 1727 (2007) KSR INTERNATIONAL CO., Petitioner, v. TELEFLEX INC. et al. No. 04-1350. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 28, 2006. Decided April 30, 2007. *1733 James W. Dabney, for petitioner. Thomas G. Hungar, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, sup
Hildebrand v. Steck Manufacturing Co.public domain
395 F.Supp.2d 1036 (2005) David L. HILDEBRAND, Plaintiff, v. STECK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ATC Products Inc., Cornwell Quality Tools Company, Mac Tools, Matco Tools, Snap-on Tools Company, Tools USA Equipment Company, Defendants. No. 02-WY-1125-AJ(OES). United States District Court, D. Colorado. October 6, 2005. *1037
220 B.R. 672 (1996) In re PATIO INDUSTRIES, a California Corporation, Debtor. LA HABRA PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PATIO INDUSTRIES, etc., Randall J. Humphreys and Robert Humphreys, Defendants and Appellants. No. ED CV 95-00388-RT, Bankruptcy No. SB 94-23827-MG. United States District Court, C.D. California. October 15, 1996.
Bailey v. Dart Container Corp. of Michiganpublic domain
980 F.Supp. 584 (1997) John A. BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF MICHIGAN, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 94-10758-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 29, 1997. *585 Erik P. Belt, Lee Carl Bromberg, Lisa M. Tittemore, Bromberg & Sunstein, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ IN RE CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULE PATENT LITIGATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ EURAND, INC. (NOW KNOWN AS APTALIS PHARMATECH, INC.), CEPHALON, INC., AND ANESTA AG,
Stilson Tool, Inc. v. Associates Machine Co.public domain
OPINION TALBOT SMITH, District Judge. In this case the plaintiff, Stilson Tool, Inc., a Michigan corporation, seeks a declaration that the patent of defendants Associates Machine Co., a sole proprietorship, Harold P. Freeman and James P. Freeman (deceased) 1 is invalid and it prays injunctive relief. The defendants have asserted that plaintiff has infringed their patent and ha
Nickola v. Petersonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES HARVEY, District Judge. This is a patent case with a pendent claim for wrongful use of trade secrets. Following the close of the evidence, defendant moved the Court for a directed' verdict in his favor as to all factual issues relating to both counts. This motion was denied. The jury returned a general verdict for defendant on the trade secrets count. The issues regarding
Steelcase, Inc. v. Delwood Furniture Co.public domain
ALYIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: A chair manufacturer who deliberately copied the highly successful chair being marketed by a competitor justifies his actions on the basis that the patents for the chair he copied were invalid. National policy encourages competition on the theory that the battle of the marketplace benefits consumers. Because every patent creates a monopoly, Congress has balanced the encouragement of inventions
Zilk v. Deaton Fountain Servicepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT. WOLLENBERG, District Judge. This patent infringement suit was tried before a jury. After the conelu*459sion of the evidence, defendant moved pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 50(a) for a directed verdict in its favor on the ground that the patent in suit was inva
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge. This is a patent case which presents issues as to the validity of a patent (U. S. Patent No. 3,528,560) on a sample display rack. It was issued September 15, 1970 and is known as the Price Patent. Appellant Lake Sales Supply is shown to be a California corporation which had headquarters in Denver from January 1971 to March 1972, but subsequently
WEICK, Circuit Judge. This action was brought in the District Court by Reynolds Metals Company (Reynolds) against Acorn Building Components, Inc. (Acorn) for infringement of Nilsen Patent U.S. Patent No. 3,204,324 entitled “Method For Making An Insulated Frame Construction,” of which patent Reynolds was the assignee. Acorn denied in
578 F.2d 74 199 U.S.P.Q. 69 STEELCASE, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Appellee,v.DELWOOD FURNITURE CO., INC., a corporation,Defendant-Appellee Cross-Appellant.STEELCASE, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.DELWOOD FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 75-2170, 76-3061. United States Court of Appea
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. This litigation involves apparatus used in hip surgery for fixation of fractures. Dr. William Minor Deyerle is the owner of United States Patent No. 3,002,514. The patented apparatus is described in the claims as “an instrument for use in fixation of fractures in the upper femur.” Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. (OEC) is the exclusive li