Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01066-SCT AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION v. ESTATE OF ROBERT LEE RANKIN, SR., JEAN MARIE HOWARD RANKIN, JACQUELYN DENISE RANKIN ANDERSON, AND ROBERT LEE RANKIN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THE HEIRS AT LAW OF ROBERT LEE RANKIN, SR., DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/24/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D22-917 LT Case No. 2019-CF-521 _____________________________ VERMOUNT JAMES ANDERSON, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. R. Lee Smith, Judge. David J. Joffe, of Joffe Law, P

*761 PER CURIAM: W. Lee Patrick appeals his convictions for embezzlement and conspiracy to embezzle from an organization receiving federal funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 666. He argues that his conviction must be reversed because: (1) the district court erroneously admitted certain summary ch

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Arthur and Linda Brown sued James and Laura Anderson for breach of contract and tortious breach of contract stemming from the Browns’ purchase of *880the Andersons’ house. After the Browns presented their case to a jury, the Hinds County Circuit Court granted the Andersons’ motion for a directed verdict. The circuit ju

BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Herman Scott (Scott) filed suit seeking damages after Anderson-Tully Company removed timber from a twenty-acre parcel of land Scott claimed to own. Scott also sought to quiet and confirm title and to enjoin Anderson-Tully from entering the land. The chancellor dismissed Scott’s claim, finding that Anderson-Tully had acquired title to the twenty acres through adverse possession. S

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Charlotte Kokocinski brought a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Med-tronic, Inc., against current and former directors and officers of Medtronic, and against Medtronic as a nominal defendant. The district court 1 dismissed the action on the basis of a report by a special litigation committee

MEMORANDUM OPINION Jane A. Restani, Judge Appellant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc, (“Jackson Hospital”) appeals the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama (“bankruptcy court”) overruling its objection to Appellee Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama’s (“BCBS”) proof of claim. Order Overruling Obj. of Jackson Hospital to Claim Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Ala.1-2, DE 56 (“Order O

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. In this case, we address the immediate appealability of a district court's denial of class certification. The named plaintiffs are the Anderson Living Trust (formerly known as the James H. Anderson Living Trust), Robert Westfall, and the Minnie Patton Scholarship Foundation Trust (collectively, the Trusts), 1

439 F.Supp.2d 644 (2006) Gerald James HOLLAND Petitioner v. James ANDERSON, Commissioner, and Walter Booker, Superintendent Respondents. No. 1:98 CV 562B. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. June 29, 2006. *645 *646 *647

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-00960-COA FARRA L. (CASSIDY) SHERIDAN APPELLANT v. JAMES P. CASSIDY JR. APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/01/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GLENN ALDERSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAFAYETTE COUNTY CHANCERY

10/16/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 18, 2018 ARTHUR LEE JAMISON, JR., v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-A-473 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________

AP-77,029 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/3/2015 3:12:21 PM Accepted 8/3/2015 3:19:51 PM August 4, 2015

THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE ********************************************* TO THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF ANDERSON COUNTY, GREETING: Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 27th day of August, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between NOBLE LEE BARRETT, JR., Appellant NO. 12-13-00185-CR; Trial Court N

*911 HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: Appellants, Emanuel Isaacs, Harold Hart, Billy Lee Anderson, Jr., and James Stymest, a/k/a Peabody, appeal their convictions stemming from the arson and bombing of an Atlanta nightclub. We affirm. FACTS In 1980, Emanuel Isaa

James Harris Appendix Page 000001 February 3, 2015 NO. AP-77,029 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS JAMES HARRIS JR. Appellant VS. STATE OF TEXAS Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 149TH DISTRICT COURT

ACCEPTED 13-14-00380-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 9/23/2015 1:24:07 PM Dorian E. Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1928 ___________________________ James J. Thole; Sherry Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. U.S. Bank, National Association

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2024-0648 ____________ HAROLD LEE HARVEY, JR., Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. June 18, 2026 PER CURIAM. Harold Lee Harvey, Jr. appeals the summary denial of his third su

BY THE COURT: .On February 3, 2004, we granted rehearing en banc> to consider whether the purely intrastate use of a facility of interstate commerce — namely, a telephone— *1144 satisfied the jurisdictional requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1958, the federal murder-for-hire statu