Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James Michael Farren”
Michael Don Denton v. Statepublic domain
FILE COPY BRIAN QUINN Chief Justice Court of Appeals VIVIAN LONG Clerk JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice Seventh District of Texas MAILING ADDRESS: MACKEY K. HANCOCK Justice Potter County C
Farren v. Baltimore Ravens, Inc.public domain
Appellant appeals the trial court's decision granting summary judgment in appellee's favor. Since the record indicates that the trial court erred in its conclusion, we reverse. On August 23, 1994, appellant Paul V. Farren filed an application with the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation seeking compensation for injuries he incurred on May 6, 1992. The application was denied following a formal hearing before the district hearing officer of the Industrial Commission. Appellant appealed
Michael Don Denton v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 07-15-00181-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 9/18/2015 11:05:31 AM
Michael Don Denton v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 07-15-00182-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 9/18/2015 11:11:46 AM
Noel v. Kaiser Bellwood Corp.public domain
PER CURIAM. Rick Noel appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985 (1994). Kaiser Bellwood Corporation and James S. Johnston appeal from the district court’s order granting Noel’s motion to extend the notice of appeal period. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible er
Upton v. Statepublic domain
894 S.W.2d 426 (1995) Roy Allen UPTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 07-93-0440-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. February 2, 1995. *427 Michael Hrin, Amarillo, for appellant. James Farren Dist. Atty., John L. Owen, Canyon, for appellee. Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and DODSON and QUINN, JJ. <
Gilding v. Carrpublic domain
608 F.Supp.2d 1147 (2009) John GILDING, a married man, Plaintiff, v. John S. CARR, et. al., Defendants. No. CV-08-2137-PHX-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. April 7, 2009. *1148 Daniel Seth Riley, Michael William Pearson, Robert Dewayne Wooten, Curry *1149 Pearson & Wooten PLC
756 F.Supp.2d 928 (2010) Lawrence E. JAFFE PENSION PLAN, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co., Inc., Arthur Andersen, L.L.P., William F. Aldinger, David A. Schoenholz, Gary Gilmer, J.A. Vozar, Robert J. Darnall, Gary G. Dillon, John A. Edwardson, Mary Johnston Evans, J. Dudley Fishburn, Cyrus F. Freidheim, Louis
892 F.2d 208 58 USLW 2404 Steven J. GLUSBAND, as Receiver for Michael Starbuck, Inc.and Associates, Plaintiff,v.FITTIN CUNNINGHAM & LAUZON, INC., James J. Armenakis, asReceiver for Michael Starbuck, Inc., Michael Starbuck,Robert Starbuck, John Starbuck, Paul Carmel, Thomas J.Fittin, Jr., Joseph Lauzon, Frank Earl Kunker III, InsuranceCompany of North America and National Grange Mutual
Cavin Anthony Ludwig v. Statepublic domain
OPINION MACKEY K. HANCOCK, Justice. Appellant, Cavin Anthony Ludwig, appeals from his conviction for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon1 and resulting sentence of confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (ID-TDCJ). Appellant brings forward two issues on appeal. First, appellant contends that the tri
Juan Alaniz v. the O'Quinn Law Firm, John M. O'Quinn & Assoc., LLP, the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Abel Manjipublic domain
JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00027-CV JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Louie Albarado, Walter Albro, Haskell Andrews, Johnny Anazaldua, Jose Manuel Araujo, James D. Archer, Roberto Ovalle Armendariz, Matthew Auguste, David Bachus, Richard
Glusband v. Fittin Cunningham & Lauzon, Inc.public domain
WINTER, Circuit Judge: This is an action by plaintiff Steven J. Glusband, as receiver for Michael Star-buck, Inc. and Associates (“MSIA”), to recover losses suffered by MSIA under a bond insuring against the dishonest or fraudulent conduct of employees. Magistrate Francis tried the case before a jury that found appellant Insurance Company of North America (“INA”) liable under that bond for the losses. Because we conclude that
Weaver v. Synthes, Ltd.(USA)public domain
162 Ariz. 442 (1989) 784 P.2d 268 Peggy L. WEAVER, a single woman, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SYNTHES, LTD. (U.S.A.), a Pennsylvania corporation; Taylor & Cawthorne, Ltd.; and Gregory D. Lantz, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1 CA-CV 88-131. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. August 22, 1989. Review Denied January 16, 1990
425 S.E.2d 468 (1993) 108 N.C. App. 700 RICHMOND COUNTY v. NORTH CAROLINA LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY and Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc. CHATHAM COUNTY and Wake County v. NORTH CAROLINA LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY and Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc. Nos. 9120SC1231, 9115SC1239, 9220SC158 and 9215SC159. Court of Appeals of North Caroli
In the Interest of Websterpublic domain
982 S.W.2d 526 (1998) In the Interest of Justin Gregory WEBSTER, a Child. No. 07-97-0028-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. October 19, 1998. *527 William L. Rivers, Amarillo, for appellant. Dale Lee, Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Amarillo, James Farren, Criminal District Attorney, for appellee.
Schafer v. Exelon Corp.public domain
(2007) David SCHAFER, Tim Perry, Pat Martin, Michael Murray, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Sam R. Wexler, Plaintiffs, v. EXELON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Saul R. Wexler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Commonwealth Edison Co., et al., Defendants. Nos. 07 C 2316, 07 C 2318. United States District Court, N.D.
Communications Workers of America, Local 1087 v. Monmouth County Board of Social Servicespublic domain
96 N.J. 442 (1984) 476 A.2d 777 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1087, A LABOR ORGANIZATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, A CORPORATE ENTITY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC WELFARE, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme C
929 N.E.2d 220 (2010) WEIGAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and Ohio Farmers Insurance Co., Appellants-Defendants/Cross-Appellees, v. STEPHENS FABRICATION, INC., and Ball State University Board of Trustees, Appellees-Plaintiffs/Cross-Appellants. No. 18A02-0910-CV-953. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 25, 2010. *222 Michael L. James, B
Smith v. Newport News Shipbuilding Health Plan, Inc.public domain
148 F.Supp.2d 637 (2001) Valerie SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING HEALTH PLAN, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. A. 4:01CV47. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. June 18, 2001. *638 *639 *640 Richard D. Carter, David S.
State v. Liam M.public domain
BISHOP, J. The defendant, Liam M., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree with a dangerous instruement in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2) 1 and disorderly conduct in violation of General Statutes § 53a-182 (a) (1). 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1