⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Nathaniel Williams, Sr.”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 551 F. App'x 72
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steven William Ferrell, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting Babcock & *73Wilcox’s motion for summary judgment and denying Ferrell’s motion to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reve
Perkins v. Hainespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-10-27 · Published · cited 61× · 661 F.3d 623; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22659; 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 166; 2011 WL 5103951
661 F.3d 623 (2011) William F. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aena Y. HAINES, James Bronner, Simone Bronner, Nathaniel Bronner, George Russell Curtis, Sr., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-10683. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. October 27, 2011. *625 Colin Bernardino, John W. Mills, Kilpatrick Townsend &am;
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered December 17, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,691-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE
Sixta, Daniel Jamespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
I 1 WRIT NUMBER: WR-60-547-13 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN,TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL* FEB 23 2015 EX PARTE Alb8lAoos£a8CI@irk DANIEL JAMES SIXTA APPLICANT.
John Francis Briscoe, and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David a Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Liston Noble Dorian Maddox Charles E. Brent Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappas MacEo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordan, Liston Noble, and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David A. Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Dorian Maddox Charles E. Brent Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappas MacEo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordan. Charles E. Brent, and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David A. Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Liston Noble Dorian Maddox Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappas MacEo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordan, Glenn Ford, Sr., and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David A. Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Liston Noble Dorian Maddox Charles E. Brent Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappas MacEo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordan, Marshall E. Conway, and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David A. Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Liston Noble Dorian Maddox Charles E. Brent Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappas MacEo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordan, William Washington, and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David A. Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Liston Noble Dorian Maddox Charles E. Brent Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappasmaceo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordan, Calvin Robinson-Bey, and Leon Abdul-Muhyee Faruq David A. Sumrall Terry Wayne Carr Henry P. Jackson Hubert Moore Orvel Lloyd Fred Graves Liston Noble Dorian Maddox Charles E. Brent Timothy W. Knode Thomas E. Saul Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. v. Elmanus Herndon Warren Sparrow Bruce Stout James Rollins John Wilt Terrie Chavis John Brown Eugene Nuth Bishop L. Robinson Marjorie A. Jennings Daniel Zachagnini John W. Wolfgang Harry J. Traurig Frank Pappas MacEo Williams Arthur Crawmer Richard Lanham Fred E. Jordanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995-05-25 · Published · cited 2× · 56 F.3d 60; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19077
56 F.3d 60NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John Francis BRISCOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,andLeon Abdul-Muhyee FARUQ; David A Sumrall; Terry WayneCarr; Henry P. Jackson; Hubert Moore; Orvel Lloyd; FredGraves
Zimmerman v. Allenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011-03-08 · Published · cited 0× · 226 Ariz. 492; 250 P.3d 558; 603 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27; 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 29
OPINION JOHNSEN, Judge. ¶ 1 We hold in this case that a testator’s failure to create a “list of final instructions” that was to be attached to her will did not invalidate the testamentary intent with which she created the will. Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s order declining to admit the will to probate and remand for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 10× · 334 Ga. App. 898; 780 S.E.2d 515
Branch, Judge. Charles Jordan Hawkins and Jacob Nathaniel Hawkins, residents of South Carolina, filed suit in Fulton County against James A. Blair III, a resident of South Carolina and an attorney with Nexsen Pruet, LLC, which is located in South Carolina, alleging that Blair illegally transferred money from their personal bank accounts at Morgan Stanley in Atlanta to Nexsen Pru
State v. Valadezpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-08-15 · Published · cited 12× · 251 So. 3d 1273
GARRETT, J. *1275The defendant, Ismael Valadez, was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated ("DWI"), fourth offense. He was sentenced to serve 15 years at hard labor and to pay a fine of $5,000. Valadez appeals his sentence of incarceration as unconstitutionally excessive. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction and s
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 727 N.E.2d 483; 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 591; 2000 WL 464736
OPINION BAKER, Judge Appellants-petitioners Scott L. King, in his capacity as the Mayor of Gary (the Mayor), and the Lake County Board of Elections and Registration (the Election Board) bring this appeal of the trial court’s order enjoining them from holding any election pursuant to Ind.Code § 20-3-21-3, as amended by P.L. 153-1997 (the Gary School Board Statute). The Gary School Board Statute, as amended
Harris v. Gilchristpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 785 S.E.2d 119; 246 N.C. App. 67; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 234
DILLON, Judge. *68 Polyfield Harris, William Harris, Tonya Barkley, Samantha Davis, and Patrick Perkins ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's order (1) denying their claims for rents and profits and for attorneys' fees and (2) apportioning the proceeds to which they are entitled from the
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ 15-2206, 15-2217, 15-2230, 15-2234, 15-2272, 15-2273 15-2290, 15-2291, 15-2292, 15-2294, 15-2304 & 15-2305 ________________ IN RE: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS CONCUSSION INJURY LITIGATION Craig Heimburger; Dawn Heimburger, Appellants (15-2206) Cleo Miller; Judson Flint;
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered April 10, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,444-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ST
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 518 F.2d 85; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14333
518 F.2d 85 Minervino A. ROJAS, Sr. and Maria P. Rojas, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 73-3535. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. June 9, 1975. 1 Nathaniel J. Friedman, Los Angeles, Cal.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000-02-29 · Published · cited 1× · 122 F. Supp. 2d 915; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2746; 2000 WL 263982
122 F.Supp.2d 915 (2000) Richard BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. and Carole Bialczak, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Nos. 92 C 1683, 92 C 2104 and 92 C 2666. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 29, 2000. *916 Judson H. Miner, Miner Barnhill & Gal
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996-02-02 · Published · cited 9× · 76 F.3d 1381; 1996 WL 38985
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I add this word to Judge Daughtrey’s dissent expressing appreciation for the historical perspective of the Voting Rights Act, which was provided by Judge Keith. I think that it is particularly significant for this statement to be made at this time in that the nation is reflecting on the centennial of the pernicious decision handed down by the Supreme Court in <
Harnois v. Lamontpublic domain
Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2011-11-04 · Published · cited 1× · 83 Va. Cir. 473; 2011 Va. Cir. LEXIS 255
By Judge Everett A. Martin, Jr. This action came before the Court on October 24. The plaintiff filed, inter alia, motions for default judgment and to amend his complaint, and he noticed them for hearing that day. Several defendants filed motions, demurrers, and a special plea, and gave notice of hearing that day as well. The plaintiff withdrew his notice on October 18, which was received by the Clerk on October 21,
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2020-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
Southerland v. Woopublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-09-10 · Published · cited 2× · 44 F. Supp. 3d 264; 2014 WL 4470831
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION COGAN, District Judge. This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 brought by a father and his now-grown children for damages against Timothy Woo, a former caseworker for the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (“ACS”). Plaintiffs alleged essentially two claims stemming from their removal from the family home in 1997: (1) Woo made false statements or omitt
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002-06-18 · Published · cited 56× · 294 F.3d 702
*705LITTLE, District Judge: Today we consider a consolidated appeal by Defendants-Appellants from the district court’s order in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees, compelling arbitration. Defendants-Appellants include the following parties: John D. Orr, Betty F. Sanford, Frankie L. Moore, Jimmie Martin, and Nathaniel Henley (collectively referred to as the “Appellants”). Pla
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
12/12/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 15, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BOBBY HANSARD Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 115334 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________