Cases

184 N.J. Super. 447 (1982) 446 A.2d 549 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PHILLIP PASSAFIUME, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 27, 1982. Decided May 17, 1982. *448 Before Judges BOTTER, ANTELL and FURMAN. Cathy L. Wasserman, Assis

DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on the Government’s objections to Magistrate Judge Schroeder’s Report and Recommendation, which recommends granting the Defendant’s motion to suppress. As discussed below, Cattaraugus County Deputy Sheriffs relied on the Defendant’s wife’s consent to search a bam located on the Defendant’s property.

236 Pa. Superior Ct. 179 (1975) Commonwealth ex rel. Schulberg v. Hirsch, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 17, 1975. September 22, 1975. *180 Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ. James L. Weisman, with him Friedman, Weisman, Passafiume, Swart

26 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 175 (1976) Allegheny County Police Pension Fund, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Robert P. Casey, Auditor General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Defendant. No. 227 C.D. 1975. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 2, 1976. August 20, 1976. Argued February 2, 1976, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges KRAMER

476 Pa. 261 (1978) 382 A.2d 461 ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE PENSION FUND v. Robert P. CASEY, Auditor General, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 29, 1977. Decided January 31, 1978. *262 Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Chief Counsel, Frank A. Woelfling, Deputy Counsel, Dept. of Auditor Gen., Rober

Defendant was charged with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. He was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. That the victim of the assault — a police officer named Delaney — was shot by some person at the time and place described in the evidence is a fact established beyond dispute. The defendant was positively identified by witnesses as the man who di

264 B.R. 1 (2001) In re TRACY'S FLOWERS AND GIFTS, INC., Debtor. William S. Meeks, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. First Bank of South Arkansas, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-11308. Adversary No. 00-1518. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division. June 12, 2001. William S. Meeks, Crossett, AR, for Trustee. Paul Lindsey, Camden, AR, for Defen

Dissenting Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr. : I dissent. I must respectfully disagree with the majority’s determination that summary judgment will lie neither in favor of the Commonwealth nor any of the Defendants with respect to alleged violations of Section 12 (b) of the Solicitation of Charitable Funds Act (Act), Act of August 9, 1963, P.L. 628, as amended, 10 P.S. §160-12 (b). Esse

387 Pa. 1 (1956) Virden v. Hosler, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 26, 1956. November 27, 1956. *2 Before STERN, C.J., JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ. *3 James J. Burns, Jr., for appellant. J. Lawrence McBride, with him G

[Cite as State v. Leon, 2019-Ohio-1178.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. H-18-018 Appellee Trial Court No. CRI 93 0620 v. Josefino Alvaro Leon DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

446 F.Supp.2d 153 (2006) Michael J. FLAHERTY, Jr., Eugene P. Adams, Joseph A. Agro, Mark D. Arcara, Randy G. Attea, James F. Bargnesi, Christopher J. Belling, Diana M. Boccio, Timothy P. Bridge, Catherine A. Carey, Kenneth F. Case, Melissa M. Chiasera, Peter J. Cosgrove, Peter J. Crotty, Don Dally, John DeFranks, Jorge S. DeRosas, John C. Doscher, G. Michael Drmacich, Daniel DuBois, Susan Etu Eagan, Robert C. Figliola, Thomas M. Fininerty, John J. Flynn,

Argued April 10, 1946. The wife-plaintiff was injured when a rotted board in a wooden sidewalk, broke under her as she stepped upon it. These appeals go to the entry of judgments for the city notwithstanding verdicts for plaintiffs. It is conceded that the wife-plaintiff is not chargeable with contributory negligence as a matter of law, and the only question raised is the negligence of the city. Baldauf Street, a short dead-end street runs east and west along a hillside in a thickly po

PER CURIAM. Defendant was indicted for second degree sexual assault, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2b (count one), and first degree aggravated sexual assault, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2a(l) (count two). At a jury trial defendant was acquitted on the latter count but convicted of the former. He was sentenced to the custody of the Commissioner of Corrections for 10 years, with four years of parole ineligibilit

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This action involves overtime pay claims brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1988). Plaintiffs are past or present GS-1811 special agents with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”). On January 18, 1991, this court considered its jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' claims in light of the holding in Carter v. Gibbs, </

346 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2004) Lawrence J. WARFIELD, Receiver for CP Direct, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Marc A. GARDNER; North American Bancard, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Defendants. No. CV 04-0974-PHXJAT. United States District Court, D. Arizona. October 29, 2004. *1035 Ryan W. Anderson, Guttilla & Murphy PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaint

229 N.J. Super. 28 (1988) 550 A.2d 998 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KEVIN NEAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted September 28, 1988. Decided November 23, 1988. *29 Before Judges BRODY, ASHBEY and SKILLMAN. Alfred A. Slocum, Publ

Brown, J., This matter is before the court en banc on defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, on a plea of res judicata. At the outset we point out that judgment on the pleadings should be entered only in clear cases, and where there are no facts in dispute: Wood v. Collingdale Borough, 366 Pa. 624. Plaintiff’s complaint avers that on or about August 24, 1960, at or about 11:20 P.M

Smart, J., The argument in this case is based on defendant Lena Ardolino’s answer raising preliminary objections under Equity Rule No. 48 (12 PS Ann. §1221) to the bill of complaint filed in the above case by Louise M. Ardolino, plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of James Ardolino. Two separate causes of action are set forth in plaintiff’s bill: 1. Plaintiff alleges that her decea

MEMORANDUM & ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS ACTIONS Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 492 A. General Theory ... 492 B. Original Cases ... 493 II. Procedural Background ... 496 A. Overview of Cases ... 496 B. Motion to Dismiss for Lack

Deeweit, C. P. J. In the Bureau the two cases entitled as above were, for convenience and by consent of counsel, tried together. Each, however, presents a separate and independent issue and so they were dealt with upon the hearing. The petitioner Alex Rivers, now deceased, filed his claim petition against American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation under date of April 20th, 1944. The petition states