Cases

Burkes Mechanical, Inc. ("Burkes"), appeals from a judgment entered against it indemnifying Ft. James-Pennington, Inc. ("Ft. James"), in the amount of $989,963.19, which represented Ft. James's payment to settle an action against it, plus attorney fees and litigation expenses. We affirm. This dispute arises out of events that occurred in 1997 at a pulp and paper mill owned and operated by Ft. James in Choctaw County ("the mill"). On April 12, 1997, Burkes agreed in an "on-site

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 753 KA 03-01616 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES PENNINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (M

Affirmed and Opinion Filed August 23, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00269-CV JOHN P. HAGAN, Appellant V. JAMES E. PENNINGTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Collin County, Texas

Order entered June 29, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00010-CV JOHN P. HAGAN, Appellant V. JAMES E. PENNINGTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Order entered March 21, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00010-CV JOHN P. HAGAN, Appellant V. JAMES E. PENNINGTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate ¡Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph S. Forma, J.), dated June 11, 2003. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL 440.10. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his pro se

Order entered July 3, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00010-CV JOHN P. HAGAN, Appellant V. JAMES E. PENNINGTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Order entered November 15, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00010-CV JOHN P. HAGAN, Appellant V. JAMES E. PENNINGTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate ¡Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph S. Forma, J.), dated June 11, 2003. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL 440.10. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his pro se

— Motion for rear*1223gument denied. Present — Centra, J.E, Sconiers, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

— Motion for rear*1223gument denied. Present — Centra, J.E, Sconiers, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

Motion for reargument denied. Present—Scudder, PJ., Hurlbutt, Centra and Pine, JJ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DIANE PENNINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-796 (JEB) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 24, 2021, this Court entered a default judgment on liability against Defendant Islamic Republic of Iran for a series of six

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DIANE PENNINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-796 (JEB) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Between 2005 and 2008, a series of sixteen terrorist attacks in Iraq killed or wounded twenty members of the United States military. Plaintiff

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Pine, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Harley Pennington (defendant) appeals his sentence, imposed by the trial court on his conviction for leaving the scene of an accident with death. Determining that the trial court erred in increasing the defendant’s sentence after it had been earlier affirmed on direct appeal, we reverse. This appeal is the second direct appeal filed by the defendant in connection with

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Harry Pennington III and Timothy Lorentz (together "Plaintiffs") filed this putative class action against Fluor Corporation, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Fluor Daniel Maintenance Services, Inc. ("Fluor Daniel"), SCANA Corporation ("SCANA") and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company ("SCE & G") (collectively "Defendants") alleging that the termination of their employment

707 S.E.2d 724 (2011) Marco PETERS, Plaintiff v. Lisa PENNINGTON, Defendant. No. COA10-91. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 1, 2011. *728 Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP, Raleigh, by K. Edward Greene and Tobias S. Hampson, for Appellant Lisa Pennington. James McElroy & Diehl, Charlotte, by Preston O. Odo

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING SAWAYA, J. The State has filed a Motion for Rehearing. That motion is denied. We have, however, decided to clarify our opinion, so we withdraw the previously rendered opinion and substitute the following. This case involves a fatal collision between a sport utility vehicle (SUV) and motorcycle that is so unusual, the State’s accident reconstructionist