Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Amul R. Thapar, United States. District Judge. A collective-bargaining agreement does not have the'Midas touch, transforming every , state-law claim in the vicinity into a federal case. Here, Bryan Price sued his employer, Appalachian Regional Healthcare, advancing two state-law' claims: a civil-rights violation and breach- of contract. Appalachian then removed the case to this

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, District Judge. The court has before it the motion of Defendants to strike Plaintiffs’ deposition errata *570sheets and Plaintiffs’ motion to strike portions of Defendants’ rebuttal expert report and for other sanctions. The complaint underlying the motions at issue alleges that antitrust violations w

434 F.3d 1127 James R. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE; Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-35306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted En Banc June 23, 2005. Filed January 10, 2006.

[Cite as James v. James, 2025-Ohio-1975.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY Ronald Gene James, : Case No. 24CA1207 Plaintiff-Appellee, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY v. : Yvonne A. James,

As to whether the Plaintiff will suffer hardship absent immediate review, unless the Defendants' decision is definitively unwound, she faces an imminent, painful, and dangerous withdrawal and an attendant risk of discontinued treatment, overdose, *158and death. See Defs.' Br. 4 (describing "worst [case] scenario" in which "the Plaintiff will be withdrawn from

OPINION J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs, CineTel Films, Inc. (“Cine-Tel”) and Family of the Year Productions, LLC (“Family”), (collectively, “plaintiffs”), filed a complaint in this court on August 11, 2011 against unidentified John Doe defendants 1-1,052,1 seeking monetary and *547injunctive re

CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff physicians appeal the District Court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their claim that the defendants, Northern Michigan Hospitals, Inc., and the Burns Clinic Medical Center, P.C., had violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

PITMAN, J. Plaintiff George M. Gilmer, Jr., appeals the judgment of the trial court which granted motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants, Principle Energy, L.L.C., f/k/a/ Regal Energy, L.L.C. ("Principle"), and Classic Production Services, Inc. ("Classic"), finding that the drilling of a shut-in well, which had been tested for production of minerals, interrupted prescription on a royalty interest. Plaintiff also appeals

[Cite as James v. Ohio Edison Co., 2025-Ohio-1046.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) JOSEPH JAMES C.A. No. 31224 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN

85 N.Y.2d 874 (1995) 649 N.E.2d 1196 626 N.Y.S.2d 52 J. R. Loftus, Inc., Respondent, v. David R. White et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued February 15, 1995. Decided March 23, 1995. Harvey and Harvey, Harvey & Mumford, Albany (Jonathan P. Harvey of counsel), for appellants.<

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00326-CV Yvonne HARRISON, Appellant v. HEARD & SMITH, L.L.P., John R. Heard, Mark S. Smith, and Kristen Smith,

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 52 In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., &c., Appellant, v. James J. Breheny, &c., et al., Respondents. Monica L. Miller, for appellant. Kenneth A. Manning,

Cite as 2023 Ark. 53 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-21-198 TERESA JAMES Opinion Delivered: March 16, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. V. 52CV-18-154] MARY CYNTHIA MOUNTS, JAMES HONORABLE DAVID F. G

Cite as 2023 Ark. 53 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-21-198 TERESA JAMES Opinion Delivered: March 16, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. V. 52CV-18-154] MARY CYNTHIA MOUNTS, JAMES HONORABLE DAVID F. G

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Edith R. White, by and through her power of attorney and next friend, FILED Naomi June Hutchinson, September 1, 2017 Plaintiff Below, Petitioner RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES CLEM and ARTHUR ) KURAYEV, Derivatively on ) Behalf of WALGREENS BOOTS ) ALLIANCE, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0240-LWW ) JAMES

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA GREGORY SMITH, ) ) Supreme Cour

24 S.W.3d 570 (2000) UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; RCW of Edmond, Inc.; Renaissance Women's Center of Austin L.L.C.; and Renaissance Women's Center of Austin, L.P., Appellants, v. Margaret THOMPSON, M.D.; Linda Litzinger, M.D.; Donna Hurley, M.D.; Melanie Collins, M.D.; Sherry Neyman, M.D.; Laura Meritt, M.D.; Byron Darby, M.D.; and Renaissance Women's Group, P.A., Appellees. No. 03-00-00052-CV. Cou

422 B.R. 407 (2010) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc., Plaintiff, v. BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited, Defendant. No. 08-13555 (JMP). Adversary No. 09-01242 (JMP). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. January 25, 2010. *410 Weil, Gotshal & Manges L