Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James R. Walsh Trustee v. School District of Lancaster”
Walsh v. Principal Life Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, Chief Judge. Before the Court are two motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, and Defendants’ Motion to Strike Reports and Testimony of Robert H. Klonoff and Mark Johnson. The Motion for Class Certification was filed by Patricia A. Walsh (“Walsh” or “Plaintiff’) on October 13, 2009. Clerk’s No. 85. Principal Life Insurance Company (“Principal”) and Pr
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
County Council v. District Land Corp.public domain
274 Md. 691 (1975) 337 A.2d 712 COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND v. DISTRICT LAND CORPORATION ET AL. [No. 170, September Term, 1974.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 8, 1975. Motions for rehearing filed June 6, 1975. Denied June 24, 1975. The cause was argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIG
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicinepublic domain
988 F.Supp. 127 (1997) Gregory F. DANIEL, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BOARD OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, et al., Defendants. No. 90-CV-1086A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 19, 1997. *128 *129 *130 *1
Harris v. Office of Personnel Managementpublic domain
NIES, Chief Judge. Edward L. Harris appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board), MSPB No. AT0831910870I-1, affirming on February 27, 1992, the determination of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that he elected to provide a survivor annuity for his spouse which election is irrevocable under the Civil Service Retirement System Spouse Equity Act. 53 M.S.P.R. 177. We affirm.
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
962 F.Supp. 450 (1997) In re: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. No. MDL 1061. Civil Action No. 95-4704. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 17, 1997. *451 *452 *453 *454
Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Boardpublic domain
DOGGETT, Justice, concurring and dissenting. “Don’t Mess With Texas” —A motto that captures the Texas spirit. Texans understand the directive “Don’t Mess With Texas”; the majority does not. If the mess is big enough, if the stench is strong enough, no matter how great the danger to public health and safety, an indus
Wagner v. Holtzapplepublic domain
MEMORANDUM MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. 1. BACKGROUND: This case presents a question about the constitutionality of a search and seizure in a college dormitory environment. The primary issue presented cannot be decided by the Court at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings, and, consequently, several of the claims will proceed to discovery. II. DISCUSSI
Kaul v. Christiepublic domain
AMENDED OPINION (amending DE 200) KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge *215Dr. Richard A. Kaul, an anesthesiologist by training, claims to be a minimally invasive spine surgeon. In March 2014, the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners (the "Board") said otherwise. Because his performance of spine surgeries on 11 patients wit
Durkin v. Sheapublic domain
957 F.Supp. 1360 (1997) Ronald L. DURKIN, Trustee of the Benchmark Irrevocable Trust, Plaintiff, v. Patricia A. SHEA, as Executrix of the Estate of William A. Shea, et al., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 1932(CSH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 6, 1997. *1361 *1362 Lawrence Kill,
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp.public domain
[Cite as Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp., 2013-Ohio-4186.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 98728 and 98729 NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT PLAINTIF
Lundman v. McKownpublic domain
530 N.W.2d 807 (1995) Douglass G. LUNDMAN, as trustee for the next of kin of Ian Douglass Lundman, deceased, Respondent, v. Kathleen McKOWN (C2-94-897), William McKown (C5-94-893), Mariano Victor Tosto (C3-94-892), Quinna Lamb, n/k/a Quinna Giebelhaus (C1-94-891), Clifton House, Inc. (C9-94-895), Appellants, Metropolitan Open School, Defendant, The First Church of Christ, Scientist (C0-94-896), James Van Horn (C7-94-894), Appellants.
Weeks v. Kramer (In Re Weeks Securities, Inc.)public domain
89 B.R. 697 (1988) In re G. WEEKS SECURITIES, INC., Debtor. Constance H. WEEKS, Plaintiff, v. Bruce S. KRAMER; Rosenfield, Borod & Kramer, P.C., a/k/a Borod & Huggins, a partnership; T. Harold Craig; and Francis J. Scott, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 79-22564-B, Adv. No. 87-0208. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, W.D. August 26, 1988.
Schweizer v. Mulvehillpublic domain
93 F.Supp.2d 376 (2000) Richard T. SCHWEIZER and Richard T. Schweizer as Parent and Natural Guardian of Scott Schweizer, Plaintiffs, v. John H. MULVEHILL, Esq. and Urban S. Mulvehill, Esq., Defendants. No. 95 CIV. 10743 MGCMHD. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2000. *377 *378
State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd.public domain
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 235.] THE STATE EX REL. MALLORY, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd., 1998-Ohio-380.] Mandamus to compel Public Employees Retirement Board to credit relator with fourteen years of service as a public employee with the Franklin County Public Defender’s Office—Writ granted, when.
Hal Crews and Debra Leitch v. DkASI Corporation, Debra H. Holley, David Holley and ASI Gymnastics, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM
Labbe v. Nissen Corp.public domain
404 A.2d 564 (1979) Emilien Richard LABBE et al. v. NISSEN CORPORATION. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. July 19, 1979. *565 Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster by John J. O'Leary, Jr. (orally), Ralph I. Lancaster, Jr., Portland, for plaintiffs. Thompson, Willard & McNaboe by Alan S. Polackwich (orally), Portland, fo
Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.public domain
Greaney, J. The plaintiff, Arthur S. Demoulas, commenced a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. (DSM), and Valley Properties, Inc. (Valley), against the defendants, alleging that the defendants had wrongfully, and in breach of fiduciary duties, usurped corporate opportunities that should have been presented to DSM and Valley. A Superior Court judge sitting without a jury presided over a complex
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA